INTC vs SKX Stock Comparison
Compare INTC and SKX across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between INTC and SKX?
SKX leads the current stock comparison as Skechers U.S.A., Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Intel Corp. vs Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
SKX leads
SKX leads by 13 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Value, but the lead has narrowed from 27 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 4 of 5 evidence groups support SKX, and its lead is narrowing.
Intel Corp.
Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SKX over INTC, 57 versus 44 as of Sep 11, 2026. SKX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and value. 4 of 5 covered evidence groups favor SKX today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. SKX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 27 to 13 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Intel Corp. and Skechers U.S.A., Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare INTC and SKX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience28 vs 80SKX +52
- Value30 vs 48SKX +18
- Quality39 vs 55SKX +16
4 of 5 evidence groups favor SKX. SKX’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and value.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -8
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
SKX's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — INTC and SKX both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SKXSKX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SKXSKX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SKXSKX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
SKXSKX on Risk Resilience, by 52 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | INTC | SKX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -0.1% | -0.2% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +136.1% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 27 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 5 covered evidence groups favor SKX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SKX | 44 vs 57 |
| Fundamentals | SKXon balance | revenue growth 18.8% vs 1.2%; EPS growth -195.9% vs -15.6%; TTM ROE -10.8% vs 8%; gross margin 38.9% vs 52.7% — SKX takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SKX | Value 30 vs 48 |
| Technicals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Risk Resilience | SKX | Risk Resilience 28 vs 80 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside -0.1% vs -0.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of INTC and SKX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 13 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 4 of 5 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SKX.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10SKX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 27 to 13 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SKX +13
- 44 vs 57
- 7 sessions ago
- SKX +22
- 35 vs 57
- 30 sessions ago
- SKX +27
- 38 vs 65
- 90 sessions ago
- SKX +32
- 33 vs 65
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (31.44%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
No active signals
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +2.61%, AIQ -2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 52 points behind, the largest single contributor to SKX's edge.
- 2INTC's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed.
- 3SKX starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 14 points over 30 sessions, and a further 13-point move would eliminate SKX's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SKX leads on balance| Metric | INTC | SKX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.8% | 1.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -195.9% | -15.6% |
| Gross margin | 38.9% | 52.7% |
| Operating margin | 0.1% | 9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -10.8% | 8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.58 | 0.47 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | INTC | SKX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 11.4% | — |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.6% | — |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -6.3% | — |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 109.1% | — |
| Year to date | 171.9% | — |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 309.8% | — |
Technicals
Split| Metric | INTC | SKX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 61.3 | — |
| ADX (14) | 15.5 | — |
| Price vs 50-day | 4.2% | — |
| Price vs 200-day | 33.4% | — |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 58.9% | — |
Risk
SKX is the more resilient| Metric | INTC | SKX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.89 | — |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.12 | -2.03 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.98 | -2.59 |
| Max drawdown | -41.9% | -0.3% |
| Current drawdown | -28.8% | -0.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 79.9% | 1.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.2% | -0.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, INTC or SKX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SKX is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 57 against INTC's 44. The edge comes from risk resilience and value. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is INTC or SKX the better buy right now?
SKX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SKX over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SKX leads Risk Resilience by 52 points; SKX leads Value by 18 points; SKX leads Quality by 16 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, INTC or SKX?
Analyst price targets imply -0.1% upside for INTC and -0.2% for SKX. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, INTC or SKX?
SKX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SKX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 18 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, INTC or SKX?
SKX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, INTC or SKX?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, INTC or SKX?
SKX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SKX on Risk Resilience, by 52 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is INTC more profitable than SKX?
SKX leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 38.9% vs 52.7%; operating margin 0.1% vs 9%; ttm roe -10.8% vs 8%.
Is SKX's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
SKX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 27 to 13 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the INTC vs SKX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 52 points behind, the largest single contributor to SKX's edge; INTC's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed; SKX starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 14 points over 30 sessions, and a further 13-point move would eliminate SKX's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about INTC and SKX?
INTC: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. SKX: No active signals. The most decision-relevant rule on INTC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare INTC and SKX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.