INTC vs SNPS Stock Comparison
SNPS currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 50 vs 33. The clearest difference is quality.
What is the main difference between INTC and SNPS?
SNPS leads the current stock comparison as Synopsys, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Intel Corp. vs Synopsys, Inc.
SNPS leads
SNPS leads by 17 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 22 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors INTC on target upside.
Competitive: 5 of 6 evidence groups support SNPS, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Intel Corp.
Synopsys, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SNPS over INTC, 50 versus 33 as of Oct 31, 2026. SNPS's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience. SNPS also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors INTC. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SNPS today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. SNPS lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 22 to 17 points over 30 sessions. SNPS leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare Intel Corp. and Synopsys, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare INTC and SNPS against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality39 vs 58SNPS +19
- Risk Resilience28 vs 46SNPS +18
- Value30 vs 46SNPS +16
- Momentum34 vs 49SNPS +15
5 of 6 evidence groups favor SNPS. SNPS’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +11
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
SNPS's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — INTC and SNPS both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SNPS (Synopsys, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SNPSSNPS on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SNPSSNPS on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SNPSSNPS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points.
Momentum
SNPSSNPS on the Momentum factor, by 15 points.
Lower downside
SNPSSNPS on Risk Resilience, by 18 points.
Analyst upside
INTCINTC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors SNPS, analyst targets favor INTC. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | INTC | SNPS | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +76.7% | +18.2% | INTC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +107.6% | +50.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 25 | 14 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SNPS. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SNPS | 33 vs 50 |
| Fundamentals | SNPSon balance | revenue growth 18.8% vs 8.8%; EPS growth -195.9% vs 30.7%; TTM ROE -10.8% vs 3.6%; gross margin 38.9% vs 72.4% — SNPS takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SNPS | Value 30 vs 46 |
| Technicals | SNPS | Price vs 50-day -35.3% vs 7.7%; vs 200-day 10.4% vs 8.6% |
| Risk Resilience | SNPS | Risk Resilience 28 vs 46 |
| Analyst expectations | INTC | Target upside 76.7% vs 18.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of INTC and SNPS and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 17 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SNPS.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28SNPS lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 22 to 17 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SNPS +17
- 33 vs 50
- 7 sessions ago
- SNPS +9
- 31 vs 40
- 30 sessions ago
- SNPS +22
- 40 vs 62
- 90 sessions ago
- SNPS +20
- 32 vs 52
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Sep 21 when SNPS moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only INTC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (17.44%)
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only SNPS
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.18%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, MACD Bearish Crossover.
SNPS leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -28.58%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -4.61%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to SNPS's edge.
- 2INTC's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3SNPS's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 5 points over 30 sessions, and a further 17-point move would eliminate SNPS's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SNPS leads on balance| Metric | INTC | SNPS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.8% | 8.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -195.9% | 30.7% |
| Gross margin | 38.9% | 72.4% |
| Operating margin | 0.1% | 9.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -10.8% | 3.6% |
| Debt to equity | 0.58 | 0.35 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | INTC | SNPS |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.8% | 6.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -20.5% | 10.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 4.8% | 23.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 6.3% | 0.1% |
| Year to date | 158.9% | 2.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 149.6% | 3.8% |
Technicals
SNPS has the stronger structure| Metric | INTC | SNPS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 36.1 | 45.2 |
| ADX (14) | 25.5 | 19.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -35.3% | 7.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 10.4% | 8.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 52.8% | 63.5% |
Risk
SNPS is the more resilient| Metric | INTC | SNPS |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.08 | 1.68 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.41 | 0.25 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.52 | 0.39 |
| Max drawdown | -41.9% | -31.2% |
| Current drawdown | -32.2% | -9.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 77.9% | 45.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.2% | -4.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, INTC or SNPS?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SNPS is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 50 against INTC's 33. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is INTC or SNPS the better buy right now?
SNPS carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SNPS over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SNPS leads Quality by 19 points; SNPS leads Risk Resilience by 18 points; SNPS leads Value by 16 points. SNPS leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by INTC simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, INTC or SNPS?
Analyst price targets imply +76.7% upside for INTC and +18.2% for SNPS, so the Street currently favors INTC. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors SNPS. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, INTC or SNPS?
SNPS is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SNPS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, INTC or SNPS?
SNPS on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, INTC or SNPS?
SNPS on the Momentum factor, by 15 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, INTC or SNPS?
SNPS is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SNPS on Risk Resilience, by 18 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is INTC more profitable than SNPS?
SNPS leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 38.9% vs 72.4%; operating margin 0.1% vs 9.8%; ttm roe -10.8% vs 3.6%.
Is SNPS's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
SNPS lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 22 to 17 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-21, when SNPS moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the INTC vs SNPS verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to SNPS's edge; INTC's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; SNPS's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 5 points over 30 sessions, and a further 17-point move would eliminate SNPS's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about INTC and SNPS?
INTC: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. SNPS: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on INTC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SNPS it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare INTC and SNPS with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.