INTC vs TGI Stock Comparison
TGI currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 43 vs 33. The clearest difference is risk resilience.
What is the main difference between INTC and TGI?
TGI leads the current stock comparison as Triumph Group, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Intel Corp. vs Triumph Group, Inc.
TGI leads
TGI leads by 10 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience and Value, and the lead has widened from 3 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 4 of 5 evidence groups support TGI, and its lead is widening.
Intel Corp.
Triumph Group, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TGI over INTC, 43 versus 33 as of Oct 31, 2026. TGI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience and value. 4 of 5 covered evidence groups favor TGI today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. TGI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Intel Corp. and Triumph Group, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare INTC and TGI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience28 vs 43TGI +15
- Value30 vs 41TGI +11
- Quality39 vs 44TGI +5
4 of 5 evidence groups favor TGI. TGI’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience and value.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session.
TGI's lead narrowed by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — INTC and TGI both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TGITGI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
TGITGI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TGITGI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 11 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
TGITGI on Risk Resilience, by 15 points.
Analyst upside
TGITGI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | INTC | TGI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +76.7% | +226.8% | TGI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +107.6% | +7.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 25 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 5 covered evidence groups favor TGI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | TGI | 33 vs 43 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 18.8% vs 19.8%; EPS growth -195.9% vs 89.5%; TTM ROE -10.8% vs -45.2%; gross margin 38.9% vs 31.5% |
| Valuation | TGI | Value 30 vs 41 |
| Technicals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Risk Resilience | TGI | Risk Resilience 28 vs 43 |
| Analyst expectations | TGI | Target upside 76.7% vs 226.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of INTC and TGI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 10 points.
- 4 of 5 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TGI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28TGI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 10 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- TGI +10
- 33 vs 43
- 7 sessions ago
- TGI +12
- 31 vs 43
- 30 sessions ago
- TGI +3
- 40 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- TGI +18
- 32 vs 50
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Oct 6 when TGI moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only INTC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (17.44%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.58%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
No active signals
No signal that the other name lacks.
INTC is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -28.58%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 15 points behind, the largest single contributor to TGI's edge.
- 2INTC's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3TGI starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | INTC | TGI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.8% | 19.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -195.9% | 89.5% |
| Gross margin | 38.9% | 31.5% |
| Operating margin | 0.1% | 11% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -10.8% | -45.2% |
| Debt to equity | 0.58 | -12.91 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | INTC | TGI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.8% | — |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -20.5% | — |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 4.8% | — |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 6.3% | — |
| Year to date | 158.9% | — |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 149.6% | — |
Technicals
Split| Metric | INTC | TGI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 36.1 | — |
| ADX (14) | 25.5 | — |
| Price vs 50-day | -35.3% | — |
| Price vs 200-day | 10.4% | — |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 52.8% | — |
Risk
TGI is the more resilient| Metric | INTC | TGI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.08 | — |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.41 | — |
| Sortino ratio | 2.52 | — |
| Max drawdown | -41.9% | — |
| Current drawdown | -32.2% | — |
| Annualized volatility | 77.9% | — |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.2% | — |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, INTC or TGI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TGI is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 43 against INTC's 33. The edge comes from risk resilience and value. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is INTC or TGI the better buy right now?
TGI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TGI over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. TGI leads Risk Resilience by 15 points; TGI leads Value by 11 points; TGI leads Quality by 5 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, INTC or TGI?
Analyst price targets imply +76.7% upside for INTC and +226.8% for TGI, so the Street currently favors TGI. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, INTC or TGI?
TGI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TGI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 11 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, INTC or TGI?
TGI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, INTC or TGI?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, INTC or TGI?
TGI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TGI on Risk Resilience, by 15 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is INTC more profitable than TGI?
INTC leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 38.9% vs 31.5%; operating margin 0.1% vs 11%; ttm roe -10.8% vs -45.2%.
Is TGI's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
TGI lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 3 to 10 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-06, when TGI moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the INTC vs TGI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 15 points behind, the largest single contributor to TGI's edge; INTC's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; TGI starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about INTC and TGI?
INTC: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. TGI: No active signals. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on INTC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare INTC and TGI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.