INTC vs TPVG Stock Comparison
Compare INTC and TPVG across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between INTC and TPVG?
TPVG leads the current stock comparison as TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Intel Corp. vs TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
TPVG leads
TPVG leads by 17 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience. Wall Street currently favors INTC on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support TPVG.
Intel Corp.
TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TPVG over INTC, 52 versus 35 as of Sep 7, 2026. TPVG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience. TPVG also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors INTC. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TPVG today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. TPVG lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 17 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Intel Corp. and TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare INTC and TPVG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value30%30 vs 64TPVG +34
- Risk Resilience15%29 vs 43TPVG +14
- Quality30%39 vs 52TPVG +13
- Momentum25%40 vs 41Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor TPVG. TPVG’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-05, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-04.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
TPVG's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — INTC and TPVG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
TPVG (TriplePoint Venture Growth BDC Corp.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on technicals, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 47.7% against 21.7%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TPVGTPVG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
TPVGTPVG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TPVGTPVG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 34 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
TPVGTPVG on Risk Resilience, by 14 points.
Analyst upside
INTCINTC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors TPVG, analyst targets favor INTC. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | INTC | TPVG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +7.4% | -4.4% | INTC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +136.1% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 27 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TPVG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | TPVG | 35 vs 52 |
| Fundamentals | TPVGon balance | revenue growth 18.8% vs 8.9%; EPS growth -195.9% vs 73.3%; TTM ROE -10.8% vs 11%; gross margin 38.9% vs 76% — TPVG takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | TPVG | Value 30 vs 64 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -4.8% vs 5.1%; vs 200-day 29.2% vs -5.5% |
| Risk Resilience | TPVG | Risk Resilience 29 vs 43 |
| Analyst expectations | INTC | Target upside 7.4% vs -4.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of INTC and TPVG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 17 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TPVG.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 24 – Sep 5TPVG lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 17 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- TPVG +17
- 35 vs 52
- 7 sessions ago
- TPVG +24
- 34 vs 58
- 30 sessions ago
- TPVG +17
- 41 vs 58
- 90 sessions ago
- TPVG +7
- 40 vs 47
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (35.67%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.34%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
0 bullish / 2 bearish
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (11.18%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +4.51%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -2.43%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Value gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to TPVG's edge.
- 2INTC's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3TPVG starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TPVG leads on balance| Metric | INTC | TPVG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.8% | 8.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -195.9% | 73.3% |
| Gross margin | 38.9% | 76% |
| Operating margin | 0.1% | 65.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -10.8% | 11% |
| Debt to equity | 0.58 | 1.26 |
Performance
INTC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | INTC | TPVG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 7.1% | -3.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -5.8% | 0.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3.4% | -2.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 120.6% | -0.8% |
| Year to date | 159.6% | -20% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 299.2% | -22.9% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | INTC | TPVG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 37.6 | 32.9 |
| ADX (14) | 14.2 | 32.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4.8% | 5.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 29.2% | -5.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 47.7% | 21.7% |
Risk
TPVG is the more resilient| Metric | INTC | TPVG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.91 | 0.75 |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.06 | -0.68 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.84 | -1.18 |
| Max drawdown | -41.9% | -35.3% |
| Current drawdown | -32% | -23.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 79.2% | 35.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.2% | -3.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, INTC or TPVG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TPVG is the stronger of the two as of Sep 7, 2026, scoring 52 against INTC's 35. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is INTC or TPVG the better buy right now?
TPVG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 7, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TPVG over INTC?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. TPVG leads Value by 34 points; TPVG leads Risk Resilience by 14 points; TPVG leads Quality by 13 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, INTC or TPVG?
Analyst price targets imply +7.4% upside for INTC and -4.4% for TPVG, so the Street currently favors INTC. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors TPVG. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, INTC or TPVG?
TPVG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TPVG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 34 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, INTC or TPVG?
TPVG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, INTC or TPVG?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, INTC or TPVG?
TPVG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TPVG on Risk Resilience, by 14 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is INTC more profitable than TPVG?
TPVG leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 38.9% vs 76%; operating margin 0.1% vs 65.6%; ttm roe -10.8% vs 11%.
Is TPVG's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
TPVG lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 17 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-24 and 2026-09-05. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the INTC vs TPVG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Value gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to TPVG's edge; INTC's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; TPVG starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about INTC and TPVG?
INTC: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. TPVG: 0 bullish / 2 bearish. The most decision-relevant rule on INTC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TPVG it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare INTC and TPVG with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.