JEPI vs SPYI: Performance, Holdings, Fees & Risk
JEPI and SPYI are ETFs, but they can differ materially in exposure, yield, fees and risk. JEPI is JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF, while SPYI is Neos S&P 500(R) High Income ETF. SPYI is broader by holdings count, with 508 positions versus 136 for JEPI. SPYI is more concentrated at the top, based on top-10 holdings weight. Current AlgovestIQ evidence has JEPI ahead on AIQ Score, 60 versus 49.
What is the main difference between JEPI and SPYI?
SPYI holds 508 positions to JEPI's 136, and 37% of their weight is in the same securities.
| Metric | JEPI | SPYI |
|---|---|---|
| Fund | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.68% |
| Holdings | 136 | 508 |
| Top-10 concentration | 18.1% | 38% |
| Distribution yieldTrailing 12 months | 8.03% | 12.01% |
| Average volume | 4,396,432 | 2,696,728 |
| Performance | ||
| 1Y return | -1.2% | +0.2% |
| YTD return | -0.7% | +0.2% |
| Risk | ||
| Annualized volatility | 8.4% | 11.1% |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -7.7% | -10.1% |
| Beta | 0.41 | 0.81 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.52 | -0.19 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.76 | -0.26 |
| AlgovestIQ | ||
| AIQ Score | 60/100 | 49/100 |
| AIQ Edge Score | 8/10 | 4/10 |
| Momentum | 53/100 | 25/100 |
| Risk Resilience | 73/100 | 80/100 |
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF vs Neos S&P 500(R) High Income ETF
JEPI leads
JEPI leads by 11 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value, having only recently taken the lead back from SPYI.
Fragile: 2 of 4 evidence groups support JEPI, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF
Neos S&P 500(R) High Income ETF
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors JEPI over SPYI, 60 versus 49 as of Oct 24, 2026. JEPI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value, while SPYI holds the stronger risk resilience profile. JEPI also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 2 of 4 covered evidence groups favor JEPI today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. JEPI lead: Reversed — SPYI led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; JEPI now leads by 11.
Compare JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF and Neos S&P 500(R) High Income ETF across performance, expense ratio, dividend yield, drawdown, volatility and the Algovestiq AIQ Score.
JEPI vs SPYI: which fits what
Each row is settled by a single measure. Where the gap is too small to matter it reads Similar, and no row decides the comparison as a whole.
| If you want | JEPI | SPYI | Fits |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lower costExpense ratio | 0.35% | 0.68% | JEPI |
| Broader diversificationNumber of holdings | 136 | 508 | SPYI |
| Lower concentrationWeight of the 10 largest holdings | 18.1% | 38% | JEPI |
| Higher incomeTrailing 12-month distribution yield | 8.03% | 12.01% | SPYI |
| Smaller drawdownsMax drawdown, 1 year | -7.7% | -10.1% | JEPI |
| Lower volatilityAnnualized volatility, 1 year | 8.4% | 11.1% | JEPI |
Similar means the gap is within 0.01 percentage points of expense ratio, 25% more holdings, 3 points of top-10 weight, 0.2 points of yield, 2 points of drawdown or 1 point of volatility. Past drawdowns and volatility describe the funds’ history, not their future.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes for both ETFs.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare JEPI and SPYI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum53 vs 25JEPI +28
- Value51 vs 41JEPI +10
- Risk Resilience73 vs 80SPYI +7
- Quality68 vs 62JEPI +6
2 of 4 evidence groups favor JEPI. JEPI’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value; SPYI keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-23, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-22.
Largest factor move: Momentum -26
New signals
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -14
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
JEPI's lead narrowed by 3 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — JEPI and SPYI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
JEPI (JPMorgan Equity Premium Income ETF): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
SPYI (Neos S&P 500(R) High Income ETF): the counter-case, on risk resilience.
Fund facts, side by side
Two funds tracking overlapping universes are separated by cost and risk far more than by holdings. Those lead here.
| Measure | JEPI | SPYI | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.35% | 0.68% | Lower is better — it compounds against you every year you hold. |
| Holdings | 136 | 508 | More holdings means broader diversification, not better returns. |
| Average volume | 4,396,432 | 2,696,728 | Liquidity — matters most if you trade size. |
| Annualized volatility | 8.4% | 11.1% | Lower is a steadier ride for the same exposure. |
| Max drawdown (1Y) | -7.7% | -10.1% | The worst peak-to-trough loss over the past year. |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.52 | -0.19 | Return per unit of risk. Higher is better. |
| Beta | 0.41 | 0.81 | Sensitivity to the broad market. Neither direction is better — it depends on the role in your portfolio. |
Where the exposure actually sits
Sector exposure for each fund, ordered by the size of the difference.
How much of the same holdings they own
JEPI and SPYI share 36.98% of their weighted exposure across 111 common holdings.
19 holdings are unique to JEPI, and 396 holdings are unique to SPYI. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
SPYI is the more concentrated of the two: its ten largest positions are 37.98% of the fund, against 18.06% for JEPI (508 holdings vs 136). Concentration cuts both ways — it is what drives outperformance when the top names work, and what makes the drawdown deeper when they do not.
Largest shared positions
| Holding | JEPI | SPYI | Shared |
|---|---|---|---|
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 1.94% | 5.57% | 1.94% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 1.9% | 7.27% | 1.9% |
| AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 1.89% | 3.81% | 1.89% |
| METAMeta Platforms Inc | 1.86% | 2.14% | 1.86% |
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 1.83% | 8.02% | 1.83% |
| GOOGLAlphabet Inc | 1.71% | 2.96% | 1.71% |
| AVGOBroadcom Inc | 1.63% | 2.6% | 1.63% |
| AMDAdvanced Micro Devices Inc | 1.04% | 1.28% | 1.04% |
Shared weight is the lower of the two positions — the portion of capital both funds genuinely have in the same security.
What JEPI adds that SPYI doesn’t
| Holding | JEPI | SPYI |
|---|---|---|
| MAMASTERCARD INC COMMON | 1.78% | 0.69% |
| NEENEXTERA ENERGY INC | 1.69% | 0.26% |
| TTTRANE TECHNOLOGIES PLC | 1.69% | 0.14% |
| ABBVABBVIE INC COMMON STOCK | 1.65% | 0.68% |
| EOGEOG RESOURCES INC COMMON | 1.61% | 0.12% |
| LOWLOWE'S COS INC COMMON | 1.49% | 0.16% |
What SPYI adds that JEPI doesn’t
| Holding | SPYI | JEPI |
|---|---|---|
| NVDANVIDIA Corp | 8.02% | 1.83% |
| AAPLApple Inc | 7.27% | 1.9% |
| MSFTMicrosoft Corp | 5.57% | 1.94% |
| AMZNAmazon.com Inc | 3.81% | 1.89% |
| GOOGAlphabet Inc | 2.41% | Not held |
| MUMicron Technology Inc | 1.65% | 0.59% |
Each list is a fund’s largest positions by weight that the other fund does not hold, or holds at less than half the weight.
JEPI vs SPYI: five-year payout growth
JEPI grew its split-adjusted payout at 7.88% a year over 2020-2025. SPYI began paying distributions in 2022, so it has no 2020-2025 growth rate to compare. JEPI: The payout jumped 52.9% in 2022, a single step rather than steady compounding - often an index or mandate change.
| Dividend metric | JEPI | SPYI |
|---|---|---|
| 2025 annual payout | $4.720 | $6.146 |
| Peer rank | #1 of 3 | not ranked |
Split-adjusted annual distributions, 2020–2025. Research as of Sep 19, 2026. Yield and expense ratio above are current values, not part of this window.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 4 covered evidence groups favor JEPI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | JEPI | 60 vs 49 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | JEPI | Value 51 vs 41 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day -0.2% vs -1.7%; vs 200-day -0.6% vs -0.1% |
| Risk Resilience | SPYI | Risk Resilience 73 vs 80 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of JEPI and SPYI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 11 points.
- Only 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on JEPI.
How the comparison changed
48 daily snapshots · Sep 6 – Oct 23JEPI lead: Reversed — SPYI led by 3 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; JEPI now leads by 11.
- Today
- JEPI +11
- 60 vs 49
- 7 sessions ago
- JEPI +3
- 62 vs 59
- 30 sessions ago
- SPYI +3
- 55 vs 58
- 90 sessions ago
- Not covered
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Oct 14 when JEPI moved ahead of SPYI.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only JEPI
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.35%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
3 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only SPYI
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (1.62%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (2.9%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Bollinger Band Squeeze, ATR Contraction - Coiling.
JEPI leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.77%, AIQ -6 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.44%, AIQ -3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1SPYI closes the Momentum gap — currently 28 points behind, the largest single contributor to JEPI's edge.
- 2SPYI's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3JEPI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Performance
SPYI leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | JEPI | SPYI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.3% | -1.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 0.2% | -1.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -0.4% | 0.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -0.8% | 0.8% |
| Year to date | -0.7% | 0.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -1.2% | 0.2% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | JEPI | SPYI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 62.8 | 30.5 |
| ADX (14) | 20.2 | 19.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | -0.2% | -1.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | -0.6% | -0.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 5.9% | 7.7% |
Risk
SPYI is the more resilient| Metric | JEPI | SPYI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.41 | 0.81 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.52 | -0.19 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.76 | -0.26 |
| Max drawdown | -7.7% | -10.1% |
| Current drawdown | -5.1% | -3.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 8.4% | 11.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -0.9% | -1.3% |
Straight answers
Short answers to the questions fund investors ask about this pair, from the figures above.
What is the difference between JEPI and SPYI?
SPYI holds 508 positions to JEPI's 136, and 37% of their weight is in the same securities.
How much do JEPI and SPYI overlap?
JEPI and SPYI share 36.98% of their weighted exposure across 111 common holdings. 19 holdings are unique to JEPI, and 396 holdings are unique to SPYI. Owning both is genuinely additive — most of the capital sits in different securities.
Which ETF is more diversified, JEPI or SPYI?
SPYI holds more positions: 508 versus 136 for JEPI.
Which has the lower expense ratio?
JEPI has the lower expense ratio, 0.35% a year against 0.68% for SPYI.
Which ETF has the higher distribution yield?
SPYI, with a trailing 12-month distribution yield of 12.01% against 8.03% for JEPI.
Which ETF has been more volatile?
SPYI has been more volatile over the past year, at 11.1% annualized against 8.4% for JEPI.
Which ETF has had the smaller drawdown?
JEPI fell less from peak to trough over the past year: -7.7% against -10.1% for SPYI.
Compare JEPI and SPYI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.