JPM vs ROKU Stock Comparison
JPM currently leads ROKU in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 53 vs 52. The clearest difference is value, while ROKU has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between JPM and ROKU?
JPM leads the current stock comparison as JPMorgan Chase & Co., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
JPMorgan Chase & Co. vs Roku, Inc.
JPM leads
JPM leads by 1 AIQ points, primarily on Value.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support JPM.
JPMorgan Chase & Co.
Roku, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors JPM over ROKU, 53 versus 52 as of Oct 31, 2026. JPM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value, while ROKU holds the stronger quality profile. JPM also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JPM today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points.
Compare JPMorgan Chase & Co. and Roku, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare JPM and ROKU against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value44 vs 24JPM +20
- Quality46 vs 61ROKU +15
- Momentum61 vs 67ROKU +6
- Risk Resilience69 vs 68Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor JPM. JPM’s edge is concentrated in value; ROKU keeps a meaningful quality edge.
The central trade-off
JPM (JPMorgan Chase & Co.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value.
ROKU (Roku, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, momentum, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
JPMJPM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
ROKUROKU on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
JPMJPM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points.
Momentum
ROKUROKU on the Momentum factor, by 6 points.
Lower downside
ROKUROKU carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
JPMJPM on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | JPM | ROKU | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +10.7% | +4.5% | JPM has more room |
| Target dispersion | +32.2% | +24.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 11 | 12 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor JPM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 53 vs 52 |
| Fundamentals | JPMon balance | revenue growth -7.6% vs 8.5%; EPS growth -27.6% vs 91.4%; TTM ROE 17.9% vs 13.2%; gross margin 63.2% vs 45.5%; operating margin 28.2% vs 5.2% — JPM takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | JPM | Value 44 vs 24 |
| Technicals | ROKU | Price vs 50-day -2% vs 0%; vs 200-day 5.2% vs 22.1% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 69 vs 68 |
| Analyst expectations | JPM | Target upside 10.7% vs 4.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of JPM and ROKU and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on JPM.
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ROKU closes the Value gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to JPM's edge.
- 2ROKU generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3JPM starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
JPM leads on balance| Metric | JPM | ROKU |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -7.6% | 8.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -27.6% | 91.4% |
| Gross margin | 63.2% | 45.5% |
| Operating margin | 28.2% | 5.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 17.9% | 13.2% |
| Debt to equity | 3.32 | 0.17 |
Performance
ROKU leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | JPM | ROKU |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.2% | -1.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 2.6% | 2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3.3% | 7.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 9.7% | 37.9% |
| Year to date | 5.3% | 43.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 12.9% | 61.3% |
Technicals
ROKU has the stronger structure| Metric | JPM | ROKU |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 60.9 | 55.5 |
| ADX (14) | 15 | 20.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -2% | 0% |
| Price vs 200-day | 5.2% | 22.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 13% | 12.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, JPM or ROKU?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, JPM is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 53 against ROKU's 52. The edge comes from value. ROKU is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is JPM or ROKU the better buy right now?
JPM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 1 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor JPM over ROKU?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. JPM leads Value by 20 points; ROKU leads Quality by 15 points; ROKU leads Momentum by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, JPM or ROKU?
Analyst price targets imply +10.7% upside for JPM and +4.5% for ROKU, so the Street currently favors JPM. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, JPM or ROKU?
JPM is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. JPM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 20 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, JPM or ROKU?
ROKU on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, JPM or ROKU?
ROKU on the Momentum factor, by 6 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, JPM or ROKU?
ROKU is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. ROKU carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is JPM more profitable than ROKU?
JPM leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 63.2% vs 45.5%; operating margin 28.2% vs 5.2%; ttm roe 17.9% vs 13.2%.
What would change the JPM vs ROKU verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ROKU closes the Value gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to JPM's edge; ROKU generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; JPM starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
Compare JPM and ROKU with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.