MSFT vs TDY Stock Comparison
TDY currently leads MSFT in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 69 vs 65. The clearest difference is momentum, while MSFT has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between MSFT and TDY?
TDY leads the current stock comparison as Teledyne Technologies Incorporated, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Microsoft Corporation vs Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
TDY leads
TDY leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Value, having only recently taken the lead back from MSFT.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support TDY, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Microsoft Corporation
Teledyne Technologies Incorporated
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TDY over MSFT, 69 versus 65 as of Oct 31, 2026. TDY's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and value, while MSFT holds the stronger quality profile. TDY also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TDY today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. TDY lead: Reversed — MSFT led by 13 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; TDY now leads by 4.
Compare Microsoft Corporation and Teledyne Technologies Incorporated across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare MSFT and TDY against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality89 vs 54MSFT +35
- Momentum60 vs 95TDY +35
- Value44 vs 58TDY +14
- Risk Resilience69 vs 76TDY +7
3 of 6 evidence groups favor TDY. TDY’s edge is concentrated in momentum and value; MSFT keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum +4
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
TDY's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — MSFT and TDY both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
TDY (Teledyne Technologies Incorporated): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and value.
MSFT (Microsoft Corporation): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TDYTDY on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
MSFTMSFT on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TDYTDY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 14 points.
Momentum
TDYTDY on the Momentum factor, by 35 points.
Lower downside
TDYTDY on Risk Resilience, by 7 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | MSFT | TDY | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +10.3% | +9.8% | Level |
| Target dispersion | +56.5% | +50.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 23 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TDY. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | TDY | 65 vs 69 |
| Fundamentals | MSFT | revenue growth 8.6% vs 1.3%; EPS growth 12.4% vs 8.4%; TTM ROE 33.2% vs 9.5%; gross margin 67.9% vs 38.5%; operating margin 46.8% vs 20% |
| Valuation | TDY | Value 44 vs 58 |
| Technicals | MSFT | Price vs 50-day 2.1% vs 6.7%; vs 200-day 21.4% vs 5.2% |
| Risk Resilience | TDY | Risk Resilience 69 vs 76 |
| Analyst expectations | Even | Target upside 10.3% vs 9.8% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of MSFT and TDY and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TDY.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28TDY lead: Reversed — MSFT led by 13 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; TDY now leads by 4.
- Today
- TDY +4
- 65 vs 69
- 7 sessions ago
- MSFT +2
- 64 vs 62
- 30 sessions ago
- MSFT +13
- 71 vs 58
- 90 sessions ago
- MSFT +13
- 61 vs 48
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Oct 26 when TDY moved ahead of MSFT.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only MSFT
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (16.89%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
3 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted
Only TDY
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.51%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish.
TDY leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -1.55%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -2.84%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1MSFT closes the Momentum gap — currently 35 points behind, the largest single contributor to TDY's edge.
- 2MSFT generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3TDY's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
MSFT leads on balance| Metric | MSFT | TDY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 8.6% | 1.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 12.4% | 8.4% |
| Gross margin | 67.9% | 38.5% |
| Operating margin | 46.8% | 20% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 33.2% | 9.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.29 | 0.18 |
Performance
TDY leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | MSFT | TDY |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.4% | 5.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 3.5% | 9.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 17.7% | 2.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 25.1% | 5.6% |
| Year to date | 9.8% | 30.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 1.4% | 25.1% |
Technicals
MSFT has the stronger structure| Metric | MSFT | TDY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 55.3 | 81.5 |
| ADX (14) | 24.7 | 20.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | 2.1% | 6.7% |
| Price vs 200-day | 21.4% | 5.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 19.5% | 21.2% |
Risk
TDY is the more resilient| Metric | MSFT | TDY |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.02 | 1.12 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.02 | 0.9 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.03 | 1.67 |
| Max drawdown | -34.9% | -15.2% |
| Current drawdown | -2.3% | -3.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 32.9% | 25.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.8% | -2.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, MSFT or TDY?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TDY is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 69 against MSFT's 65. The edge comes from momentum and value. MSFT is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is MSFT or TDY the better buy right now?
TDY carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TDY over MSFT?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. MSFT leads Quality by 35 points; TDY leads Momentum by 35 points; TDY leads Value by 14 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, MSFT or TDY?
Analyst price targets imply +10.3% upside for MSFT and +9.8% for TDY. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, MSFT or TDY?
TDY is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TDY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 14 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, MSFT or TDY?
MSFT on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, MSFT or TDY?
TDY on the Momentum factor, by 35 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, MSFT or TDY?
TDY is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TDY on Risk Resilience, by 7 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is MSFT more profitable than TDY?
MSFT leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 67.9% vs 38.5%; operating margin 46.8% vs 20%; ttm roe 33.2% vs 9.5%.
Is TDY's lead over MSFT getting stronger or weaker?
TDY lead: Reversed — MSFT led by 13 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; TDY now leads by 4. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-26, when TDY moved ahead of MSFT.
What would change the MSFT vs TDY verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: MSFT closes the Momentum gap — currently 35 points behind, the largest single contributor to TDY's edge; MSFT generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover; TDY's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about MSFT and TDY?
MSFT: 3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. TDY: 3 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on MSFT is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TDY it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare MSFT and TDY with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.