NVDA vs PG Stock Comparison
PG currently leads NVDA in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 61 vs 55. The clearest difference is momentum, while NVDA has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between NVDA and PG?
PG leads the current stock comparison as The Procter & Gamble Company, with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
NVIDIA Corporation vs The Procter & Gamble Company
PG leads
PG leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from NVDA. Wall Street currently favors NVDA on target upside.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support PG, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
NVIDIA Corporation
The Procter & Gamble Company
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PG over NVDA, 61 versus 55 as of Oct 21, 2026. PG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum, while NVDA holds the stronger quality profile. PG also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors NVDA. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PG today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. PG lead: Reversed — NVDA led by 5 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; PG now leads by 6.
Compare NVIDIA Corporation and The Procter & Gamble Company across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare NVDA and PG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum29 vs 82PG +53
- Quality97 vs 73NVDA +24
- Risk Resilience57 vs 54Even
- Value35 vs 34Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor PG. PG’s edge is concentrated in momentum; NVDA keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
PG's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — NVDA and PG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PG (The Procter & Gamble Company): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum.
NVDA (NVIDIA Corporation): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PGPG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
NVDANVDA on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
PGPG on the Momentum factor, by 53 points.
Lower downside
PGPG carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
NVDANVDA on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors PG, analyst targets favor NVDA. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | NVDA | PG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +46.4% | +0.9% | NVDA has more room |
| Target dispersion | +93.9% | +19% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 29 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | NVDA | PG |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 20.11% | 6.02% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.016 | $3.118 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $0.040 | $4.177 |
| Years increased | 2 | 5 |
| No cut in window | Yes | Yes |
| Cohort rank | #14 | #210 |
NVDA grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 20.11% a year against PG's 6.02%. Neither company reduced its regular dividend in any year of the window.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | PG | 55 vs 61 |
| Fundamentals | NVDA | EPS growth 2.9% vs -23.5%; TTM ROE 110.1% vs 29.8%; gross margin 74.7% vs 50.2%; operating margin 65.2% vs 22.7% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 35 vs 34 |
| Technicals | PG | Price vs 50-day -0.4% vs 6.4%; vs 200-day 6.5% vs 7.4% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 57 vs 54 |
| Analyst expectations | NVDA | Target upside 46.4% vs 0.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of NVDA and PG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PG.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20PG lead: Reversed — NVDA led by 5 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; PG now leads by 6.
- Today
- PG +6
- 55 vs 61
- 7 sessions ago
- PG +4
- 57 vs 61
- 30 sessions ago
- NVDA +5
- 65 vs 60
- 90 sessions ago
- NVDA +22
- 69 vs 47
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Oct 14 when PG moved ahead of NVDA.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only NVDA
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (9.67%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
3 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted
Only PG
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.56%)
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
PG leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +2.54%, AIQ -1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -1.56%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1NVDA closes the Momentum gap — currently 53 points behind, the largest single contributor to PG's edge.
- 2NVDA's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3PG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
NVDA leads on balance| Metric | NVDA | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 17.9% | -0.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 2.9% | -23.5% |
| Gross margin | 74.7% | 50.2% |
| Operating margin | 65.2% | 22.7% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 110.1% | 29.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.17 | 0.64 |
Performance
PG leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | NVDA | PG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -5.3% | 4.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -5.4% | 7.5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 2.1% | 6.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 8.3% | 9.3% |
| Year to date | 16.1% | 11.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 19.1% | 6.5% |
Technicals
PG has the stronger structure| Metric | NVDA | PG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 36.5 | 82 |
| ADX (14) | 18 | 28.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | -0.4% | 6.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | 6.5% | 7.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 23.5% | 18.9% |
Risk
Split| Metric | NVDA | PG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.94 | -0.05 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.53 | 0.16 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.92 | 0.28 |
| Max drawdown | -20.2% | -16.1% |
| Current drawdown | -9.5% | -4.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 37.8% | 19.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.7% | -1.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, NVDA or PG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PG is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 61 against NVDA's 55. The edge comes from momentum. NVDA is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is NVDA or PG the better buy right now?
PG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PG over NVDA?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PG leads Momentum by 53 points; NVDA leads Quality by 24 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, NVDA or PG?
Analyst price targets imply +46.4% upside for NVDA and +0.9% for PG, so the Street currently favors NVDA. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors PG. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, NVDA or PG?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, NVDA or PG?
NVDA on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, NVDA or PG?
PG on the Momentum factor, by 53 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, NVDA or PG?
PG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PG carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is NVDA more profitable than PG?
NVDA leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 74.7% vs 50.2%; operating margin 65.2% vs 22.7%; ttm roe 110.1% vs 29.8%.
Is PG's lead over NVDA getting stronger or weaker?
PG lead: Reversed — NVDA led by 5 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; PG now leads by 6. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-14, when PG moved ahead of NVDA.
What would change the NVDA vs PG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: NVDA closes the Momentum gap — currently 53 points behind, the largest single contributor to PG's edge; NVDA's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; PG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about NVDA and PG?
NVDA: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. PG: 3 bullish / 2 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on NVDA is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On PG it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare NVDA and PG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.