OSCR vs QQQ Stock Comparison
Compare OSCR and QQQ across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between OSCR and QQQ?
OSCR leads the current stock comparison as Oscar Health, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Oscar Health, Inc. vs Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
OSCR leads
OSCR leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 0 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 3 of 4 evidence groups support OSCR, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Oscar Health, Inc.
Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors OSCR over QQQ, 64 versus 56 as of Sep 11, 2026. OSCR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while QQQ holds the stronger risk resilience profile. OSCR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor OSCR today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. OSCR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Oscar Health, Inc. and Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1 across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare OSCR and QQQ against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience28 vs 75QQQ +47
- Value59 vs 30OSCR +29
- Momentum67 vs 45OSCR +22
- Quality86 vs 83Even
3 of 4 evidence groups favor OSCR. OSCR’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; QQQ keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -17
No new signals fired.
OSCR's lead widened by 6 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — OSCR and QQQ both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
OSCR (Oscar Health, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
QQQ (Invesco QQQ Trust, Series 1): the counter-case, on risk resilience.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
OSCROSCR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
OSCROSCR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 29 points.
Momentum
OSCROSCR on the Momentum factor, by 22 points.
Lower downside
QQQQQQ on Risk Resilience, by 47 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | OSCR | QQQ | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -15.7% | — | Level |
| Target dispersion | +83.2% | — | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | — | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | — | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 4 covered evidence groups favor OSCR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | OSCR | 64 vs 56 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | OSCR | Value 59 vs 30 |
| Technicals | OSCR | Price vs 50-day 7.1% vs 0.6%; vs 200-day 56.9% vs 7.5% |
| Risk Resilience | QQQ | Risk Resilience 28 vs 75 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of OSCR and QQQ and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on OSCR.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10OSCR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- OSCR +8
- 64 vs 56
- 7 sessions ago
- OSCR +5
- 64 vs 59
- 30 sessions ago
- Level
- 64 vs 64
- 90 sessions ago
- OSCR +15
- 65 vs 50
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Aug 6 when QQQ moved ahead of OSCR.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
5 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (47.34%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (7.75%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- ATR Contraction - Coiling — neutral, volatility, short horizon (1.27%)
QQQ is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.58%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 5 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.87%, AIQ -5 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1QQQ closes the Value gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to OSCR's edge.
- 2QQQ's ATR Contraction - Coiling turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3OSCR's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | OSCR | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 5% | — |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -47.4% | — |
| Gross margin | 44.9% | — |
| Operating margin | 4.1% | — |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 38.5% | — |
| Debt to equity | 0.21 | — |
Performance
OSCR leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | OSCR | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 7.4% | -0.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 10% | -2.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 17% | 2.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 143.1% | 16.6% |
| Year to date | 124.7% | 15.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 60.7% | 22.4% |
Technicals
OSCR has the stronger structure| Metric | OSCR | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 55.4 | 48.1 |
| ADX (14) | 17.7 | 9.8 |
| Price vs 50-day | 7.1% | 0.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | 56.9% | 7.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 49.1% | 13% |
Risk
QQQ is the more resilient| Metric | OSCR | QQQ |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.48 | 1.42 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.98 | 0.92 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.72 | 1.38 |
| Max drawdown | -51.7% | -12.2% |
| Current drawdown | -1.3% | -5% |
| Annualized volatility | 70.7% | 19.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.8% | -1.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, OSCR or QQQ?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, OSCR is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 64 against QQQ's 56. The edge comes from value and momentum. QQQ is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is OSCR or QQQ the better buy right now?
OSCR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor OSCR over QQQ?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. QQQ leads Risk Resilience by 47 points; OSCR leads Value by 29 points; OSCR leads Momentum by 22 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, OSCR or QQQ?
Analyst price targets imply -15.7% upside for OSCR and not covered for QQQ. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, OSCR or QQQ?
OSCR is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. OSCR on the peer-relative Value factor, by 29 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, OSCR or QQQ?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, OSCR or QQQ?
OSCR on the Momentum factor, by 22 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, OSCR or QQQ?
QQQ is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. QQQ on Risk Resilience, by 47 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is OSCR more profitable than QQQ?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is OSCR's lead over QQQ getting stronger or weaker?
OSCR lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 0 to 8 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-06, when QQQ moved ahead of OSCR.
What would change the OSCR vs QQQ verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: QQQ closes the Value gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to OSCR's edge; QQQ's ATR Contraction - Coiling turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; OSCR's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about OSCR and QQQ?
OSCR: 5 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral. QQQ: 2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on OSCR is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On QQQ it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.