INTC vs PRGO Stock Comparison
Compare INTC and PRGO across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between INTC and PRGO?
PRGO leads the current stock comparison as Perrigo Company plc, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Intel Corp. vs Perrigo Company plc
PRGO leads
PRGO leads by 21 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 15 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 5 of 6 evidence groups support PRGO, and its lead is widening.
Intel Corp.
Perrigo Company plc
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PRGO over INTC, 56 versus 35 as of Sep 5, 2026. PRGO's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and momentum, while INTC holds the stronger quality profile. PRGO also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PRGO today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability: signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. PRGO lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 15 to 21 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Intel Corp. and Perrigo Company plc across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare INTC and PRGO against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value30%30 vs 74PRGO +44
- Momentum25%40 vs 78PRGO +38
- Risk Resilience15%29 vs 48PRGO +19
- Quality30%39 vs 25INTC +14
5 of 6 evidence groups favor PRGO. PRGO’s edge is concentrated in value and momentum; INTC keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-04, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-03.
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
New signals
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
PRGO's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — INTC and PRGO both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PRGO (Perrigo Company plc): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and momentum.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals — but at materially higher volatility, 47.7% against 40%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PRGOPRGO on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
PRGOPRGO on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PRGOPRGO on the peer-relative Value factor, by 44 points.
Momentum
PRGOPRGO on the Momentum factor, by 38 points.
Lower downside
PRGOPRGO on Risk Resilience, by 19 points.
Analyst upside
PRGOPRGO on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | INTC | PRGO | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +7.6% | +34% | PRGO has more room |
| Target dispersion | +135.8% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 27 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PRGO. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | PRGO | 35 vs 56 |
| Fundamentals | INTCon balance | revenue growth 18.8% vs 5.5%; EPS growth -195.9% vs 118.8%; TTM ROE -10.8% vs -56%; gross margin 38.9% vs 33.3% — INTC takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | PRGO | Value 30 vs 74 |
| Technicals | PRGO | Price vs 50-day -4.8% vs 24.9%; vs 200-day 29.2% vs 21.1% |
| Risk Resilience | PRGO | Risk Resilience 29 vs 48 |
| Analyst expectations | PRGO | Target upside 7.6% vs 34% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of INTC and PRGO and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 21 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PRGO.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 23 – Sep 4PRGO lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 15 to 21 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- PRGO +21
- 35 vs 56
- 7 sessions ago
- PRGO +22
- 34 vs 56
- 30 sessions ago
- PRGO +15
- 41 vs 56
- 90 sessions ago
- PRGO +2
- 42 vs 44
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Jul 1 when PRGO moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (35.67%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.34%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.12%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +4.51%, AIQ +2 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +4.56%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Value gap — currently 44 points behind, the largest single contributor to PRGO's edge.
- 2INTC's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3PRGO starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
INTC leads on balance| Metric | INTC | PRGO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.8% | 5.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -195.9% | 118.8% |
| Gross margin | 38.9% | 33.3% |
| Operating margin | 0.1% | 5.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -10.8% | -56% |
| Debt to equity | 0.58 | 1.31 |
Performance
INTC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | INTC | PRGO |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 7.1% | 3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -5.8% | 16.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3.4% | 37% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 120.6% | 26.8% |
| Year to date | 159.6% | 7.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 299.2% | -37.3% |
Technicals
PRGO has the stronger structure| Metric | INTC | PRGO |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 37.6 | 74.6 |
| ADX (14) | 14.2 | 45.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4.8% | 24.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | 29.2% | 21.1% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 47.7% | 40% |
Risk
PRGO is the more resilient| Metric | INTC | PRGO |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.91 | 1 |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.06 | -0.61 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.84 | -0.83 |
| Max drawdown | -41.9% | -60.3% |
| Current drawdown | -32% | -35.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 79.2% | 54.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.2% | -4.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, INTC or PRGO?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PRGO is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 56 against INTC's 35. The edge comes from value and momentum. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is INTC or PRGO the better buy right now?
PRGO carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PRGO over INTC?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. PRGO leads Value by 44 points; PRGO leads Momentum by 38 points; PRGO leads Risk Resilience by 19 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, INTC or PRGO?
Analyst price targets imply +7.6% upside for INTC and +34% for PRGO, so the Street currently favors PRGO. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, INTC or PRGO?
PRGO is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PRGO on the peer-relative Value factor, by 44 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, INTC or PRGO?
PRGO on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, INTC or PRGO?
PRGO on the Momentum factor, by 38 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, INTC or PRGO?
PRGO is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PRGO on Risk Resilience, by 19 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is INTC more profitable than PRGO?
INTC leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 38.9% vs 33.3%; operating margin 0.1% vs 5.2%; ttm roe -10.8% vs -56%.
Is PRGO's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
PRGO lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 15 to 21 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-23 and 2026-09-04. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-01, when PRGO moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the INTC vs PRGO verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Value gap — currently 44 points behind, the largest single contributor to PRGO's edge; INTC's ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; PRGO starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — the composite weights Quality and Value at 30% each, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about INTC and PRGO?
INTC: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. PRGO: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 2 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on INTC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On PRGO it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare INTC and PRGO with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.