INTC vs PRIM Stock Comparison
PRIM currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 41 vs 33. The clearest difference is value, while INTC has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between INTC and PRIM?
PRIM leads the current stock comparison as Primoris Services Corporation, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Intel Corp. vs Primoris Services Corporation
PRIM leads
PRIM leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 12 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support PRIM, and its lead is narrowing.
Intel Corp.
Primoris Services Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PRIM over INTC, 41 versus 33 as of Oct 31, 2026. PRIM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience, while INTC holds the stronger quality profile. PRIM also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PRIM today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. PRIM lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 12 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Intel Corp. and Primoris Services Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare INTC and PRIM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value30 vs 64PRIM +34
- Quality39 vs 32INTC +7
- Risk Resilience28 vs 35PRIM +7
- Momentum34 vs 28INTC +6
4 of 6 evidence groups favor PRIM. PRIM’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience; INTC keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
PRIM's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — INTC and PRIM both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PRIM (Primoris Services Corporation): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on quality, momentum, fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PRIMPRIM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
INTCINTC on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PRIMPRIM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 34 points.
Momentum
INTCINTC on the Momentum factor, by 6 points.
Lower downside
PRIMPRIM on Risk Resilience, by 7 points.
Analyst upside
PRIMPRIM on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | INTC | PRIM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +76.7% | +85% | PRIM has more room |
| Target dispersion | +107.6% | +90.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 25 | 10 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PRIM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | PRIM | 33 vs 41 |
| Fundamentals | INTCon balance | revenue growth 18.8% vs 8.2%; EPS growth -195.9% vs -240.6%; TTM ROE -10.8% vs 8.5%; gross margin 38.9% vs 8.6%; operating margin 0.1% vs 3% — INTC takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | PRIM | Value 30 vs 64 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -35.3% vs -3.6%; vs 200-day 10.4% vs -35.5% |
| Risk Resilience | PRIM | Risk Resilience 28 vs 35 |
| Analyst expectations | PRIM | Target upside 76.7% vs 85% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of INTC and PRIM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PRIM.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28PRIM lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 12 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- PRIM +8
- 33 vs 41
- 7 sessions ago
- PRIM +8
- 31 vs 39
- 30 sessions ago
- PRIM +12
- 40 vs 52
- 90 sessions ago
- PRIM +11
- 32 vs 43
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Sep 29 when PRIM moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only INTC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (17.44%)
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral
Only PRIM
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (51.45%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, MACD Bearish Crossover.
INTC is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -28.58%, AIQ +1 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -3.76%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Value gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to PRIM's edge.
- 2INTC's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3PRIM starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 8-point move would eliminate PRIM's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
INTC leads on balance| Metric | INTC | PRIM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.8% | 8.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -195.9% | -240.6% |
| Gross margin | 38.9% | 8.6% |
| Operating margin | 0.1% | 3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -10.8% | 8.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.58 | 0.69 |
Performance
INTC leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | INTC | PRIM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.8% | 1.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -20.5% | -1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 4.8% | -13.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 6.3% | -55.6% |
| Year to date | 158.9% | -40.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 149.6% | -48.2% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | INTC | PRIM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 36.1 | 36.1 |
| ADX (14) | 25.5 | 20 |
| Price vs 50-day | -35.3% | -3.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | 10.4% | -35.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 52.8% | 60.5% |
Risk
PRIM is the more resilient| Metric | INTC | PRIM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.08 | 1.99 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.41 | -0.37 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.52 | -0.36 |
| Max drawdown | -41.9% | -68% |
| Current drawdown | -32.2% | -63.6% |
| Annualized volatility | 77.9% | 80.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.2% | -6.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, INTC or PRIM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PRIM is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 41 against INTC's 33. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is INTC or PRIM the better buy right now?
PRIM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PRIM over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PRIM leads Value by 34 points; INTC leads Quality by 7 points; PRIM leads Risk Resilience by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, INTC or PRIM?
Analyst price targets imply +76.7% upside for INTC and +85% for PRIM, so the Street currently favors PRIM. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, INTC or PRIM?
PRIM is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PRIM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 34 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, INTC or PRIM?
INTC on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, INTC or PRIM?
INTC on the Momentum factor, by 6 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, INTC or PRIM?
PRIM is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PRIM on Risk Resilience, by 7 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is INTC more profitable than PRIM?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 38.9% vs 8.6%; operating margin 0.1% vs 3%; ttm roe -10.8% vs 8.5%. INTC leads on one measure and PRIM on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is PRIM's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
PRIM lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 12 to 8 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-29, when PRIM moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the INTC vs PRIM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Value gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to PRIM's edge; INTC's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; PRIM starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 8-point move would eliminate PRIM's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about INTC and PRIM?
INTC: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. PRIM: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on INTC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On PRIM it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare INTC and PRIM with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.