INTC vs SBSW Stock Comparison
Compare INTC and SBSW across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between INTC and SBSW?
SBSW leads the current stock comparison as Sibanye Stillwater Limited, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Intel Corp. vs Sibanye Stillwater Limited
SBSW leads
SBSW leads by 5 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 14 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support SBSW, and its lead is narrowing.
Intel Corp.
Sibanye Stillwater Limited
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SBSW over INTC, 49 versus 44 as of Sep 11, 2026. SBSW's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and risk resilience, while INTC holds the stronger momentum profile. SBSW also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SBSW today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. SBSW lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 14 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Intel Corp. and Sibanye Stillwater Limited across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare INTC and SBSW against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value30 vs 63SBSW +33
- Risk Resilience28 vs 50SBSW +22
- Momentum77 vs 61INTC +16
- Quality39 vs 26INTC +13
4 of 6 evidence groups favor SBSW. SBSW’s edge is concentrated in value and risk resilience; INTC keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -8
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -15
New signals
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
SBSW's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — INTC and SBSW both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SBSW (Sibanye Stillwater Limited): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on momentum, quality, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SBSWSBSW on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SBSWSBSW on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SBSWSBSW on the peer-relative Value factor, by 33 points.
Momentum
INTCINTC on the Momentum factor, by 16 points.
Lower downside
SBSWSBSW on Risk Resilience, by 22 points.
Analyst upside
SBSWSBSW on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | INTC | SBSW | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -0.1% | +13.6% | SBSW has more room |
| Target dispersion | +136.1% | +31.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 27 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SBSW. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SBSW | 44 vs 49 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 18.8% vs 30.3%; EPS growth -195.9% vs 57.5%; TTM ROE -10.8% vs -12.9%; gross margin 38.9% vs 27.5% |
| Valuation | SBSW | Value 30 vs 63 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day 4.2% vs 23.1%; vs 200-day 33.4% vs -1.2% |
| Risk Resilience | SBSW | Risk Resilience 28 vs 50 |
| Analyst expectations | SBSW | Target upside -0.1% vs 13.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of INTC and SBSW and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SBSW.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10SBSW lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 14 to 5 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SBSW +5
- 44 vs 49
- 7 sessions ago
- SBSW +18
- 35 vs 53
- 30 sessions ago
- SBSW +14
- 38 vs 52
- 90 sessions ago
- SBSW +7
- 33 vs 40
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on May 18 when SBSW moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (31.44%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
0 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (24.89%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.28%)
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +2.61%, AIQ -2 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.24%, AIQ -4 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Value gap — currently 33 points behind, the largest single contributor to SBSW's edge.
- 2INTC's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed.
- 3SBSW starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 9 points over 30 sessions, and a further 5-point move would eliminate SBSW's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | INTC | SBSW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.8% | 30.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -195.9% | 57.5% |
| Gross margin | 38.9% | 27.5% |
| Operating margin | 0.1% | 23.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -10.8% | -12.9% |
| Debt to equity | 0.58 | 1.11 |
Performance
INTC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | INTC | SBSW |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 11.4% | 0.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.6% | 17.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -6.3% | 38.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 109.1% | -9.6% |
| Year to date | 171.9% | -11.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 309.8% | 39.4% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | INTC | SBSW |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 61.3 | 57.8 |
| ADX (14) | 15.5 | 36.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | 4.2% | 23.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 33.4% | -1.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 58.9% | 61.5% |
Risk
SBSW is the more resilient| Metric | INTC | SBSW |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.89 | 2.55 |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.12 | 0.86 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.98 | 1.27 |
| Max drawdown | -41.9% | -62.1% |
| Current drawdown | -28.8% | -40.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 79.9% | 67.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.2% | -6.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, INTC or SBSW?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SBSW is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 49 against INTC's 44. The edge comes from value and risk resilience. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is INTC or SBSW the better buy right now?
SBSW carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 5 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SBSW over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SBSW leads Value by 33 points; SBSW leads Risk Resilience by 22 points; INTC leads Momentum by 16 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, INTC or SBSW?
Analyst price targets imply -0.1% upside for INTC and +13.6% for SBSW, so the Street currently favors SBSW. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, INTC or SBSW?
SBSW is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SBSW on the peer-relative Value factor, by 33 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, INTC or SBSW?
SBSW on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, INTC or SBSW?
INTC on the Momentum factor, by 16 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, INTC or SBSW?
SBSW is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SBSW on Risk Resilience, by 22 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is INTC more profitable than SBSW?
INTC leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 38.9% vs 27.5%; operating margin 0.1% vs 23.4%; ttm roe -10.8% vs -12.9%.
Is SBSW's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
SBSW lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 14 to 5 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-05-18, when SBSW moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the INTC vs SBSW verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Value gap — currently 33 points behind, the largest single contributor to SBSW's edge; INTC's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed; SBSW starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 9 points over 30 sessions, and a further 5-point move would eliminate SBSW's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about INTC and SBSW?
INTC: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. SBSW: 0 bullish / 2 bearish / 2 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on INTC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SBSW it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare INTC and SBSW with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.