SKX vs TGT Stock Comparison
Compare SKX and TGT across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between SKX and TGT?
SKX leads the current stock comparison as Skechers U.S.A., Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Skechers U.S.A., Inc. vs Target Corporation
SKX leads
SKX leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 6 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 2 of 5 evidence groups support SKX, and its lead is narrowing.
Skechers U.S.A., Inc.
Target Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SKX over TGT, 57 versus 55 as of Sep 11, 2026. SKX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience, while TGT holds the stronger value profile. 2 of 5 covered evidence groups favor SKX today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. SKX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 2 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Skechers U.S.A., Inc. and Target Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare SKX and TGT against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience80 vs 56SKX +24
- Value48 vs 58TGT +10
- Quality55 vs 54Even
2 of 5 evidence groups favor SKX. SKX’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience; TGT keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No new signals fired.
SKX's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SKX and TGT both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SKX (Skechers U.S.A., Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience.
TGT (Target Corporation): the counter-case, on value, fundamentals, valuation.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SKXSKX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
TGTTGT on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TGTTGT on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
SKXSKX on Risk Resilience, by 24 points.
Analyst upside
SKXSKX on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SKX | TGT | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -0.2% | -2.9% | SKX has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +56.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 21 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 5 covered evidence groups favor SKX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 57 vs 55 |
| Fundamentals | TGTon balance | revenue growth 1.2% vs 4.3%; EPS growth -15.6% vs 140.1%; TTM ROE 8% vs 26.7%; gross margin 52.7% vs 29.3%; operating margin 9% vs 5.6% — TGT takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | TGT | Value 48 vs 58 |
| Technicals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Risk Resilience | SKX | Risk Resilience 80 vs 56 |
| Analyst expectations | SKX | Target upside -0.2% vs -2.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SKX and TGT and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SKX.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10SKX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 2 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SKX +2
- 57 vs 55
- 7 sessions ago
- TGT +4
- 57 vs 61
- 30 sessions ago
- SKX +6
- 65 vs 59
- 90 sessions ago
- SKX +17
- 65 vs 48
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Sep 9 when SKX moved ahead of TGT.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
No active signals
3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (20.12%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
TGT is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.06%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TGT closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to SKX's edge.
- 2TGT generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3SKX starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 2-point move would eliminate SKX's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TGT leads on balance| Metric | SKX | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 1.2% | 4.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -15.6% | 140.1% |
| Gross margin | 52.7% | 29.3% |
| Operating margin | 9% | 5.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 8% | 26.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0.47 | 1.05 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | SKX | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | — | -4.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | — | 1.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | — | 21.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | — | 31.1% |
| Year to date | — | 59.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | — | 70.2% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | SKX | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | — | 46.7 |
| ADX (14) | — | 30.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | — | 5% |
| Price vs 200-day | — | 26% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | — | 34.6% |
Risk
SKX is the more resilient| Metric | SKX | TGT |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | — | 0.43 |
| Sharpe ratio | -2.03 | 1.8 |
| Sortino ratio | -2.59 | 2.95 |
| Max drawdown | -0.3% | -13.8% |
| Current drawdown | -0.2% | -8.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 1.5% | 30.4% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -0.1% | -3.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SKX or TGT?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SKX is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 57 against TGT's 55. The edge comes from risk resilience. TGT is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SKX or TGT the better buy right now?
SKX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SKX over TGT?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SKX leads Risk Resilience by 24 points; TGT leads Value by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SKX or TGT?
Analyst price targets imply -0.2% upside for SKX and -2.9% for TGT, so the Street currently favors SKX. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SKX or TGT?
TGT is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TGT on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SKX or TGT?
TGT on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SKX or TGT?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SKX or TGT?
SKX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SKX on Risk Resilience, by 24 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SKX more profitable than TGT?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 52.7% vs 29.3%; operating margin 9% vs 5.6%; ttm roe 8% vs 26.7%. SKX leads on two measures and TGT on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is SKX's lead over TGT getting stronger or weaker?
SKX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 6 to 2 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 2 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-09, when SKX moved ahead of TGT.
What would change the SKX vs TGT verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TGT closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 24 points behind, the largest single contributor to SKX's edge; TGT generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as MACD Bullish Crossover; SKX starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 2-point move would eliminate SKX's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about SKX and TGT?
SKX: No active signals. TGT: 3 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. On TGT it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare SKX and TGT with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.