INTC vs SNPS Stock Comparison
Compare INTC and SNPS across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between INTC and SNPS?
SNPS leads the current stock comparison as Synopsys, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Intel Corp. vs Synopsys, Inc.
SNPS leads
SNPS leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 18 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 4 of 6 evidence groups support SNPS, and its lead is narrowing.
Intel Corp.
Synopsys, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SNPS over INTC, 46 versus 44 as of Sep 11, 2026. SNPS's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while INTC holds the stronger momentum profile. SNPS also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SNPS today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. SNPS lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 18 to 2 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Intel Corp. and Synopsys, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare INTC and SNPS against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum77 vs 32INTC +45
- Quality39 vs 58SNPS +19
- Risk Resilience28 vs 46SNPS +18
- Value30 vs 46SNPS +16
4 of 6 evidence groups favor SNPS. SNPS’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; INTC keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -8
New signals
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
No new signals fired.
The lead changed hands: SNPS moved ahead of INTC in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — INTC and SNPS both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SNPS (Synopsys, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SNPSSNPS on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SNPSSNPS on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SNPSSNPS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points.
Momentum
INTCINTC on the Momentum factor, by 45 points.
Lower downside
SNPSSNPS on Risk Resilience, by 18 points.
Analyst upside
SNPSSNPS on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | INTC | SNPS | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -0.1% | +36.6% | SNPS has more room |
| Target dispersion | +136.1% | +33.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 27 | 9 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SNPS. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 44 vs 46 |
| Fundamentals | SNPSon balance | revenue growth 18.8% vs 8.8%; EPS growth -195.9% vs 30.7%; TTM ROE -10.8% vs 3.6%; gross margin 38.9% vs 72.4% — SNPS takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SNPS | Value 30 vs 46 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day 4.2% vs -2.9%; vs 200-day 33.4% vs -11.2% |
| Risk Resilience | SNPS | Risk Resilience 28 vs 46 |
| Analyst expectations | SNPS | Target upside -0.1% vs 36.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of INTC and SNPS and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has swung materially session to session. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Signal direction runs against the verdict: the leader is net-bearish while the laggard is net-bullish. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SNPS.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10SNPS lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 18 to 2 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SNPS +2
- 44 vs 46
- 7 sessions ago
- SNPS +11
- 35 vs 46
- 30 sessions ago
- SNPS +18
- 38 vs 56
- 90 sessions ago
- SNPS +14
- 33 vs 47
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Sep 10 when SNPS moved ahead of INTC.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (31.44%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (9.29%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.04%)
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +2.61%, AIQ -2 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.05%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to SNPS's edge.
- 2INTC's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed.
- 3SNPS starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 16 points over 30 sessions, and a further 2-point move would eliminate SNPS's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SNPS leads on balance| Metric | INTC | SNPS |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.8% | 8.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -195.9% | 30.7% |
| Gross margin | 38.9% | 72.4% |
| Operating margin | 0.1% | 9.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -10.8% | 3.6% |
| Debt to equity | 0.58 | 0.35 |
Performance
INTC leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | INTC | SNPS |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 11.4% | -4.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.6% | -3.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -6.3% | -13.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 109.1% | -8.3% |
| Year to date | 171.9% | -15.4% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 309.8% | -34.8% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | INTC | SNPS |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 61.3 | 49.8 |
| ADX (14) | 15.5 | 15.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | 4.2% | -2.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | 33.4% | -11.2% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 58.9% | 62.4% |
Risk
SNPS is the more resilient| Metric | INTC | SNPS |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.89 | 1.69 |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.12 | -0.45 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.98 | -0.47 |
| Max drawdown | -41.9% | -38.4% |
| Current drawdown | -28.8% | -34.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 79.9% | 59.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.2% | -4.9% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, INTC or SNPS?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SNPS is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 46 against INTC's 44. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. INTC is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is INTC or SNPS the better buy right now?
SNPS carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SNPS over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. INTC leads Momentum by 45 points; SNPS leads Quality by 19 points; SNPS leads Risk Resilience by 18 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, INTC or SNPS?
Analyst price targets imply -0.1% upside for INTC and +36.6% for SNPS, so the Street currently favors SNPS. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, INTC or SNPS?
SNPS is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SNPS on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, INTC or SNPS?
SNPS on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, INTC or SNPS?
INTC on the Momentum factor, by 45 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, INTC or SNPS?
SNPS is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SNPS on Risk Resilience, by 18 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is INTC more profitable than SNPS?
SNPS leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 38.9% vs 72.4%; operating margin 0.1% vs 9.8%; ttm roe -10.8% vs 3.6%.
Is SNPS's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
SNPS lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 18 to 2 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-10, when SNPS moved ahead of INTC.
What would change the INTC vs SNPS verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Quality gap — currently 19 points behind, the largest single contributor to SNPS's edge; INTC's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed; SNPS starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 16 points over 30 sessions, and a further 2-point move would eliminate SNPS's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about INTC and SNPS?
INTC: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. SNPS: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on INTC is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SNPS it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare INTC and SNPS with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.