SPY vs UNM Stock Comparison
Compare SPY and UNM across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between SPY and UNM?
SPY leads the current stock comparison as State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF vs Unum Group
SPY leads
SPY leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, but the lead has narrowed from 10 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 1 of 4 evidence groups support SPY, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF
Unum Group
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SPY over UNM, 64 versus 61 as of Sep 6, 2026. SPY's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while UNM holds the stronger value profile. SPY also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 1 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SPY today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. SPY lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 3 points over 30 sessions.
Compare State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF and Unum Group across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare SPY and UNM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality30%84 vs 47SPY +37
- Risk Resilience15%89 vs 64SPY +25
- Value30%39 vs 63UNM +24
- Momentum25%57 vs 74UNM +17
1 of 4 evidence groups favor SPY. SPY’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; UNM keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-05, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-04.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
SPY's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — SPY and UNM both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SPY (State Street SPDR S&P 500 ETF): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
UNM (Unum Group): the counter-case, on value, momentum, valuation — but at materially higher volatility, 26.6% against 8.1%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SPYSPY on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
EvenGrowth figures are not covered for both names.
Value
UNMUNM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 24 points.
Momentum
UNMUNM on the Momentum factor, by 17 points.
Lower downside
SPYSPY on Risk Resilience, by 25 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | SPY | UNM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | — | +2.3% | Level |
| Target dispersion | — | +38.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | — | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | — | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
1 of 4 covered evidence groups favor SPY. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 64 vs 61 |
| Fundamentals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Valuation | UNM | Value 39 vs 63 |
| Technicals | UNM | Price vs 50-day 1.8% vs 6.8%; vs 200-day 8.1% vs 18.3% |
| Risk Resilience | SPY | Risk Resilience 89 vs 64 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of SPY and UNM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 1 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SPY.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 24 – Sep 5SPY lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 3 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SPY +3
- 64 vs 61
- 7 sessions ago
- SPY +3
- 64 vs 61
- 30 sessions ago
- SPY +10
- 71 vs 61
- 90 sessions ago
- SPY +1
- 60 vs 59
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Jul 29 when SPY moved ahead of UNM.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (6.28%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.8%)
5 bullish / 0 bearish
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (10.80%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
SPY leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.39%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.75%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1UNM closes the Quality gap — currently 37 points behind, the largest single contributor to SPY's edge.
- 2UNM's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed.
- 3SPY's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 3-point move would eliminate SPY's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | SPY | UNM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | — | -1.9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | — | 14.2% |
| Gross margin | — | 35.7% |
| Operating margin | — | 6.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | — | 6.4% |
| Debt to equity | — | 0.35 |
Performance
UNM leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | SPY | UNM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.1% | 3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.4% | 5.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 4.4% | 10.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 14.5% | 30.1% |
| Year to date | 12.9% | 20.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 19.6% | 31.7% |
Technicals
UNM has the stronger structure| Metric | SPY | UNM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 47.5 | 62.1 |
| ADX (14) | 13.6 | 18.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | 1.8% | 6.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | 8.1% | 18.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 8.1% | 26.6% |
Risk
SPY is the more resilient| Metric | SPY | UNM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1 | 0.32 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.1 | 1.12 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.56 | 1.84 |
| Max drawdown | -9.1% | -12.1% |
| Current drawdown | -1% | -0.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 12.8% | 23.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.4% | -2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, SPY or UNM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SPY is the stronger of the two as of Sep 6, 2026, scoring 64 against UNM's 61. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. UNM is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is SPY or UNM the better buy right now?
SPY carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 6, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 1 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SPY over UNM?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. SPY leads Quality by 37 points; SPY leads Risk Resilience by 25 points; UNM leads Value by 24 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, SPY or UNM?
Analyst price targets imply not covered upside for SPY and +2.3% for UNM. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, SPY or UNM?
UNM is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. UNM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 24 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, SPY or UNM?
Growth figures are not covered for both names. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, SPY or UNM?
UNM on the Momentum factor, by 17 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, SPY or UNM?
SPY is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SPY on Risk Resilience, by 25 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is SPY more profitable than UNM?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
Is SPY's lead over UNM getting stronger or weaker?
SPY lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 3 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-24 and 2026-09-05. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-29, when SPY moved ahead of UNM.
What would change the SPY vs UNM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: UNM closes the Quality gap — currently 37 points behind, the largest single contributor to SPY's edge; UNM's existing bullish trend signals translate into factor-score gains — the rules are already firing, but the scores have not yet followed; SPY's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 4 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 3-point move would eliminate SPY's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about SPY and UNM?
SPY: 4 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. UNM: 5 bullish / 0 bearish. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on SPY is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On UNM it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.