TSLA vs NFLX Stock Comparison
Tesla, Inc. vs Netflix, Inc.
NFLX leads
NFLX leads by 13 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value, but the lead has narrowed from 26 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors TSLA on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support NFLX, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Tesla, Inc.
Netflix, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors NFLX over TSLA, 60 versus 47 as of Sep 2, 2026. NFLX's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value, while TSLA holds the stronger momentum profile. NFLX also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors TSLA. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NFLX today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. NFLX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 26 to 13 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Tesla, Inc. and Netflix, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality30%41 vs 85NFLX +44
- Momentum25%82 vs 70TSLA +12
- Value30%24 vs 30NFLX +6
- Risk Resilience15%47 vs 50Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor NFLX. NFLX’s edge is concentrated in quality and value; TSLA keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-01, compared against the prior scored session 2026-08-31.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
NFLX's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — TSLA and NFLX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
NFLX (Netflix, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
TSLA (Tesla, Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 41.1% against 32.7%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
NFLXNFLX on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
TSLATSLA on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
NFLXNFLX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points.
Momentum
TSLATSLA on the Momentum factor, by 12 points.
Lower downside
NFLXNFLX carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
TSLATSLA on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors NFLX, analyst targets favor TSLA. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | TSLA | NFLX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +23.8% | +20.4% | TSLA has more room |
| Target dispersion | +31% | +60.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 12 | 17 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor NFLX. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | NFLX | 47 vs 60 |
| Fundamentals | NFLXon balance | revenue growth 26.1% vs 2.5%; EPS growth 126.7% vs -35.2%; ROE 4.6% vs 48%; gross margin 18.9% vs 49.1%; operating margin 4.2% vs 29.7% — NFLX takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | NFLX | Value 24 vs 30 |
| Technicals | NFLX | Price vs 50-day -1.6% vs 10.1%; vs 200-day -8.1% vs -7.4% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 47 vs 50 |
| Analyst expectations | TSLA | Target upside 23.8% vs 20.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of TSLA and NFLX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 13 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on NFLX.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 20 – Sep 1NFLX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 26 to 13 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- NFLX +13
- 47 vs 60
- 7 sessions ago
- NFLX +15
- 44 vs 59
- 30 sessions ago
- NFLX +26
- 34 vs 60
- 90 sessions ago
- NFLX +15
- 32 vs 47
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on May 8 when TSLA moved ahead of NFLX.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (11.32%)
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (3.72%)
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (17.14%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
NFLX leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.59%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.79%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TSLA closes the Quality gap — currently 44 points behind, the largest single contributor to NFLX's edge.
- 2TSLA's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3NFLX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 13 points over 30 sessions, and a further 13-point move would eliminate NFLX's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
NFLX leads on balance| Metric | TSLA | NFLX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 26.1% | 2.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 126.7% | -35.2% |
| Gross margin | 18.9% | 49.1% |
| Operating margin | 4.2% | 29.7% |
| Return on equity | 4.6% | 48% |
| Debt to equity | 0.11 | 0.47 |
Technicals
NFLX has the stronger structure| Metric | TSLA | NFLX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 65 | 66.3 |
| ADX (14) | 20.4 | 22.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -1.6% | 10.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -8.1% | -7.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 41.1% | 32.7% |
Risk
Split| Metric | TSLA | NFLX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.26 | 0.27 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.28 | -1.11 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.44 | -1.51 |
| Max drawdown | -39.1% | -46.5% |
| Current drawdown | -24.9% | -35.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 47.1% | 35.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.5% | -3.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, TSLA or NFLX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, NFLX is the stronger of the two as of Sep 2, 2026, scoring 60 against TSLA's 47. The edge comes from quality and value. TSLA is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is TSLA or NFLX the better buy right now?
NFLX carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 2, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor NFLX over TSLA?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. NFLX leads Quality by 44 points; TSLA leads Momentum by 12 points; NFLX leads Value by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, TSLA or NFLX?
Analyst price targets imply +23.8% upside for TSLA and +20.4% for NFLX, so the Street currently favors TSLA. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors NFLX. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, TSLA or NFLX?
NFLX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. NFLX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 6 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, TSLA or NFLX?
TSLA on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, TSLA or NFLX?
TSLA on the Momentum factor, by 12 points. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, TSLA or NFLX?
NFLX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. NFLX carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is TSLA more profitable than NFLX?
NFLX leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 18.9% vs 49.1%; operating margin 4.2% vs 29.7%; roe 4.6% vs 48%.
Is NFLX's lead over TSLA getting stronger or weaker?
NFLX lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 26 to 13 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-20 and 2026-09-01. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-05-08, when TSLA moved ahead of NFLX.
What would change the TSLA vs NFLX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TSLA closes the Quality gap — currently 44 points behind, the largest single contributor to NFLX's edge; TSLA's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; NFLX's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 13 points over 30 sessions, and a further 13-point move would eliminate NFLX's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about TSLA and NFLX?
TSLA: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. NFLX: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on TSLA is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On NFLX it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare TSLA and NFLX with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.