TSM vs TX Stock Comparison
Compare TSM and TX across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between TSM and TX?
TSM leads the current stock comparison as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited vs Ternium S.A.
TSM leads
TSM leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Quality, and the lead has widened from 1 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 3 of 6 evidence groups support TSM, its lead is widening, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
Ternium S.A.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TSM over TX, 70 versus 63 as of Sep 11, 2026. TSM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality, while TX holds the stronger value profile. TSM also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TSM today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. TSM lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 7 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited and Ternium S.A. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare TSM and TX against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality96 vs 40TSM +56
- Value42 vs 67TX +25
- Risk Resilience68 vs 76TX +8
- Momentum74 vs 78TX +4
3 of 6 evidence groups favor TSM. TSM’s edge is concentrated in quality; TX keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -8
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
New signals
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
TSM's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — TSM and TX both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality.
TX (Ternium S.A.): the counter-case, on value, risk resilience, momentum.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TSMTSM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
TXTX on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TXTX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 25 points.
Momentum
TXTX on the Momentum factor, by 4 points.
Lower downside
TXTX on Risk Resilience, by 8 points.
Analyst upside
TSMTSM on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | TSM | TX | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +32.2% | -7.6% | TSM has more room |
| Target dispersion | +38.4% | +54.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TSM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | TSM | 70 vs 63 |
| Fundamentals | TSMon balance | revenue growth 12% vs 10.3%; EPS growth 22.1% vs 63.6%; TTM ROE 39.3% vs 5.8%; gross margin 64.2% vs 17.4%; operating margin 56% vs 7.5% — TSM takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | TX | Value 42 vs 67 |
| Technicals | TX | Price vs 50-day 3.4% vs 14.3%; vs 200-day 14.1% vs 29.9% |
| Risk Resilience | TX | Risk Resilience 68 vs 76 |
| Analyst expectations | TSM | Target upside 32.2% vs -7.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of TSM and TX and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TSM.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10TSM lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 7 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- TSM +7
- 70 vs 63
- 7 sessions ago
- TSM +5
- 68 vs 63
- 30 sessions ago
- TSM +1
- 63 vs 62
- 90 sessions ago
- TSM +11
- 61 vs 50
The lead changed hands 7 times in this window, most recently on Sep 4 when TSM moved ahead of TX.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 0 bearish
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (11.73%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
4 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (14.20%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
TX is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +1.22%, AIQ -2 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +0.5%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1TX closes the Quality gap — currently 56 points behind, the largest single contributor to TSM's edge.
- 2TX's RSI Overbought resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3TSM's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TSM leads on balance| Metric | TSM | TX |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 12% | 10.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 22.1% | 63.6% |
| Gross margin | 64.2% | 17.4% |
| Operating margin | 56% | 7.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 39.3% | 5.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.15 | 0.24 |
Performance
TX leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | TSM | TX |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 3% | 1.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -0.3% | 5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 4.7% | 22% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 20.7% | 44.3% |
| Year to date | 40.9% | 50.9% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 73.2% | 67.9% |
Technicals
TX has the stronger structure| Metric | TSM | TX |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 57.7 | 73.5 |
| ADX (14) | 9.6 | 48.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | 3.4% | 14.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | 14.1% | 29.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 27.3% | 18.7% |
Risk
TX is the more resilient| Metric | TSM | TX |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.17 | 1.07 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.43 | 1.75 |
| Sortino ratio | 2.31 | 2.96 |
| Max drawdown | -21.6% | -18.9% |
| Current drawdown | -10.4% | -0.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 40.4% | 31.5% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.1% | -3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, TSM or TX?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TSM is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 70 against TX's 63. The edge comes from quality. TX is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is TSM or TX the better buy right now?
TSM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TSM over TX?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. TSM leads Quality by 56 points; TX leads Value by 25 points; TX leads Risk Resilience by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, TSM or TX?
Analyst price targets imply +32.2% upside for TSM and -7.6% for TX, so the Street currently favors TSM. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, TSM or TX?
TX is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TX on the peer-relative Value factor, by 25 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, TSM or TX?
TX on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, TSM or TX?
TX on the Momentum factor, by 4 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, TSM or TX?
TX is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TX on Risk Resilience, by 8 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is TSM more profitable than TX?
TSM leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 64.2% vs 17.4%; operating margin 56% vs 7.5%; ttm roe 39.3% vs 5.8%.
Is TSM's lead over TX getting stronger or weaker?
TSM lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 1 to 7 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 7 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-04, when TSM moved ahead of TX.
What would change the TSM vs TX verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: TX closes the Quality gap — currently 56 points behind, the largest single contributor to TSM's edge; TX's RSI Overbought resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; TSM's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about TSM and TX?
TSM: 4 bullish / 0 bearish. TX: 4 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on TSM is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TX it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare TSM and TX with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.