TSM vs XP Stock Comparison
TSM currently leads XP in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 66 vs 43. The clearest difference is quality, while XP has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between TSM and XP?
TSM leads the current stock comparison as Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited, with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited vs XP Inc.
TSM leads
TSM leads by 23 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum. Wall Street currently favors XP on target upside.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support TSM.
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited
XP Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TSM over XP, 66 versus 43 as of Oct 31, 2026. TSM's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum, while XP holds the stronger value profile. TSM also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors XP. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TSM today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability.
Compare Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited and XP Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare TSM and XP against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality98 vs 52TSM +46
- Momentum52 vs 18TSM +34
- Risk Resilience65 vs 38TSM +27
- Value45 vs 56XP +11
4 of 6 evidence groups favor TSM. TSM’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum; XP keeps a meaningful value edge.
The central trade-off
TSM (Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Limited): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
XP (XP Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 127.8% against 35.7%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TSMTSM on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
TSMTSM on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
XPXP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 11 points.
Momentum
TSMTSM on the Momentum factor, by 34 points.
Lower downside
TSMTSM on Risk Resilience, by 27 points.
Analyst upside
XPXP on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors TSM, analyst targets favor XP. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | TSM | XP | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +45% | +158.9% | XP has more room |
| Target dispersion | +34% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TSM. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | TSM | 66 vs 43 |
| Fundamentals | TSMon balance | revenue growth 17.6% vs 8.2%; EPS growth 8% vs 12.5%; TTM ROE 41.2% vs 22.1%; gross margin 65.8% vs 66.7%; operating margin 57.9% vs 31.8% — TSM takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | XP | Value 45 vs 56 |
| Technicals | TSM | Price vs 50-day -6.6% vs -36.4%; vs 200-day 10.1% vs -16.4% |
| Risk Resilience | TSM | Risk Resilience 65 vs 38 |
| Analyst expectations | XP | Target upside 45% vs 158.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of TSM and XP and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 23 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TSM.
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1XP closes the Quality gap — currently 46 points behind, the largest single contributor to TSM's edge.
- 2XP generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3TSM starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TSM leads on balance| Metric | TSM | XP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 17.6% | 8.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 8% | 12.5% |
| Gross margin | 65.8% | 66.7% |
| Operating margin | 57.9% | 31.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 41.2% | 22.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0.14 | 3.74 |
Performance
TSM leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | TSM | XP |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.8% | -13.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3.7% | -20.8% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 9% | -6.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 11.6% | -12.5% |
| Year to date | 44.6% | -1.7% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 49% | -8.4% |
Technicals
TSM has the stronger structure| Metric | TSM | XP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 41.8 | 22.9 |
| ADX (14) | 19.9 | 47.4 |
| Price vs 50-day | -6.6% | -36.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | 10.1% | -16.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 35.7% | 127.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, TSM or XP?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TSM is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 66 against XP's 43. The edge comes from quality and momentum. XP is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is TSM or XP the better buy right now?
TSM carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TSM over XP?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. TSM leads Quality by 46 points; TSM leads Momentum by 34 points; TSM leads Risk Resilience by 27 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, TSM or XP?
Analyst price targets imply +45% upside for TSM and +158.9% for XP, so the Street currently favors XP. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors TSM. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, TSM or XP?
XP is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. XP on the peer-relative Value factor, by 11 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, TSM or XP?
TSM on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, TSM or XP?
TSM on the Momentum factor, by 34 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, TSM or XP?
TSM is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TSM on Risk Resilience, by 27 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is TSM more profitable than XP?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 65.8% vs 66.7%; operating margin 57.9% vs 31.8%; ttm roe 41.2% vs 22.1%. TSM leads on two measures and XP on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
What would change the TSM vs XP verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: XP closes the Quality gap — currently 46 points behind, the largest single contributor to TSM's edge; XP generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; TSM starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
Compare TSM and XP with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.