Current etf page

ETF Analytics

OMAH ETF Holdings & Fundamentals

Fund Profile · Cost · Size · Liquidity · Exposure

Financial ServicesAsset ManagementScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

OMAHVistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF

Financial Services / Asset Management

Low Priority

Above Peers

NeutralEdge 7/10
$18.19+$0.03 (+0.17%)

Latest quote

  • Momentum
    72
  • Value
    55
  • Quality
    50
  • Risk resilience
    63
  • Sentiment
    —
algovestiq.comScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

OMAH Holdings

75 holdings; the ten largest make up 58.52% of the fund. Holdings as of Sep 12, 2026.

Holdings
75
Top 10 weight
58.52%
Share of the fund in its ten largest positions
Largest holding
AAPL
10.07%
Expense ratio
0.95%
$95.00 a year per $10,000
Fund size
$454.17M
Top sector
Financial Services
31.59%
Top 25 holdings by weight
RankSymbolHoldingWeightMarket value
1AAPLApple Inc10.07%$114.87M
2BRK-BBerkshire Hathaway Inc9.84%$112.23M
3AXPAmerican Express Co6.59%$75.15M
4KOCoca-Cola Co/The4.75%$54.2M
5CVXChevron Corp4.67%$53.23M
6OXYOccidental Petroleum Corp4.66%$53.15M
7VRSNVeriSign Inc4.55%$51.86M
8DVADAVITA INC4.51%$51.46M
9KRKroger Co/The4.49%$51.21M
10SIRISirius XM Holdings Inc4.41%$50.27M
11KHCKraft Heinz Co/The4.33%$49.36M
12MCOMoody's Corp4.31%$49.21M
13CBChubb Ltd4.29%$48.88M
14GOOGLAlphabet Inc4.25%$48.54M
15GOOGAlphabet Inc4.25%$48.49M
16BACBank of America Corp4.24%$48.41M
17DALDelta Air Lines Inc3.98%$45.46M
18NYTNew York Times Co/The2.56%$29.26M
19ALLYAlly Financial Inc2.47%$28.19M
20LENLennar Corp2.13%$24.33M
21LLYVKLiberty Live Holdings Inc2.08%$23.69M
22First American Government Obligations Fund 12/01/20310.36%$4.15M
23Cash & Other0.35%$4.05M
24VRSN US 09/18/26 C2800.19%-$2.17M
25DAL US 09/18/26 C790.10%-$1.17M

OMAH Expense Ratio

OMAH charges 0.95% a year, about $95.00 for every $10,000 invested.

Yearly cost by amount invested
InvestedCost a year
$10,000$95.00
$25,000$237.50
$100,000$950.00

The fee is taken from the fund's assets rather than billed, so it shows up as slightly lower returns.

ETF Analytics Snapshot

Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.

Price
$18.19
As of Oct 21, 2026
Fund size
$454.17M
Expense ratio
0.95%
Distribution yield
15.40%
VistaShares ETF evidence

ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.

Review ETF analytics
Holdings
75
NAV
$18.10
Average volume
1.09M
Inception
Mar 5, 2025
Asset class
Equity
Primary exposure
Financial Services (31.59%)
Beta
0.25
Momentum score
72/100

ETF Fundamentals Overview

Fund-native evidence replaces stock-only quarterly statement fields for ETF pages.

Fund profile

FieldValue
Fund nameVistaShares Target 15 Berkshire Select Income ETF
IssuerVistaShares
Asset classEquity
Primary exposureFinancial Services (31.59%)
DomicileUS
Inception dateMar 5, 2025
Websitehttps://www.vistashares.com/OMAH

Current ETF metrics

FieldValue
Fund size$454.17M
Expense ratio0.95%
Holdings count75
NAV$18.10
Average volume1.09M
Distribution yield15.40%
Beta0.25

ETF Exposure

Sector and country weights of the fund's holdings.

Sector exposure
FieldValue
Healthcare4.63%
Consumer Cyclical2.03%
Consumer Defensive14.20%
Technology15.54%
Financial Services31.59%
Cash & Others0.37%
Energy9.79%
Industrials3.93%
Country exposure
FieldValue
United States95.78%
Switzerland4.57%

ETF Risk-Adjusted Context

Risk and return-efficiency metrics sit beside fund structure rather than company financial statements.

AIQ Score
59/100

Composite research read.

Sharpe Ratio
-0.99

Return per unit of total volatility.

Sortino Ratio
—

Return per unit of downside volatility.

Max Drawdown
-9.52%

Largest trailing drawdown in the risk window.

Momentum
72/100

Trend and price behavior.

Value Exposure
55/100

Relative valuation/exposure context.

Risk
63/100

Volatility and downside resilience.

Annual Volatility
9.27%

Annualized realized volatility.

ETF analytics context
How to read OMAH's ETF profile

Read cost, fund size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, distribution yield, and exposure together. ETF analytics should not be judged by company-only fields such as revenue, EPS, margins, or payout ratio when those rows are not applicable.

Analysis tools

Export and portfolio tools complement the ETF evidence above.

Fundamentals export

Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow

Unlock with Pro
Portfolio context

Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings

Unlock with Premium
Continue to OMAH AIQ Pro
See how ETF evidence contributes to the full analysis workspace.

How to Read a Fundamental Profile

Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.

The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.

Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.

Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.

How to Read This Table

  • Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
  • ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
  • Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
  • Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
  • FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
  • Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.

These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.

OMAH ETF Analytics FAQ

What is OMAH's expense ratio?

OMAH's expense ratio shows the annual fund cost when available. Compare it with holdings, tracking exposure, liquidity, dividend yield, and volatility.

What is OMAH's dividend yield?

OMAH's dividend or distribution yield helps investors compare income potential. It should be weighed against fund strategy, expense ratio, and risk.

How diversified is OMAH?

OMAH's diversification depends on holdings count, top-position concentration, and sector exposure. Fund size and liquidity do not automatically mean broad diversification.

Is OMAH overvalued or undervalued?

ETF valuation depends on the valuation of its underlying holdings, sector exposure, and market regime. Use fund fundamentals with risk and technical context.