ETF Analysis
Roundhill Investments - PLTR WeeklyPay ETF (PLTW) ETF Analysis
Roundhill Investments - PLTR WeeklyPay ETF (PLTW) ETF analysis covering performance, holdings context, risk, drawdowns, volatility, momentum, dividends, valuation exposure, and the current AlgovestIQ assessment.
Roundhill Investments - PLTR WeeklyPay ETF (PLTW) currently has an AIQ Score of 43/100, indicating a neutral setup. Momentum is the strongest factor at 64/100. Risk is the weakest current factor at 14/100. Performance, momentum, risk, distribution, and exposure evidence should be read together at the latest market-close snapshot.
PLTW at a Glance
Crawlable current metrics from the latest market-close ETF snapshot.
| Metric | Current |
|---|---|
| Price | $25.89 |
| AIQ Score | 43/100 |
| Overall View | Neutral |
| Technical Analysis Consensus | Buy |
| Fund Size | $130.82M |
| Expense Ratio | 0.99% |
| Holdings Count | 5 |
| NAV | $24.54 |
| Asset Class | Equity |
| Primary Exposure | Cash & Others (79.85%) |
| Issuer | Roundhill Investments |
| Domicile | US |
| Inception Date | Feb 19, 2025 |
| Distribution Yield | 67.45% |
| Beta | 0.37 |
| Average Volume | 163.54K |
| 52-week range | $15.00-$50.90 |
| RSI 14 | 53.49 |
| 50-Day SMA | $24.78 |
| 200-Day SMA | $24.21 |
| Risk Score | 14/100 |
| Momentum Score | 64/100 |
| Value Exposure Score | — |
PLTW Long-Horizon ETF Performance
Trailing returns, growth of $10,000, drawdown history, and calendar-year returns from available daily closes.
| Period | Total return | Annualized | Max drawdown | Start date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | -45.77% | -45.79% | -70.22% | Oct 20, 2025 |
| 3Y | -44.53% | -29.82% | -73.75% | Feb 19, 2025 |
| 5Y | -44.53% | -29.82% | -73.75% | Feb 19, 2025 |
| 10Y | -44.53% | -29.82% | -73.75% | Feb 19, 2025 |
Growth of $10,000
Indexed to the first available close in this history window.
Drawdown History
Peak-to-trough decline from each prior high over the available window.
Calendar-Year Returns
Full-year returns where available, with the current calendar year shown as YTD.
PLTWRoundhill Investments - PLTR WeeklyPay ETF
Financial Services / Asset Management - Income
Low Priority
Relative Laggard
Latest quote
- Momentum64
- Value—
- Quality39
- Risk resilience14
- Sentiment—
PLTW ETF Analysis Summary
Roundhill Investments - PLTR WeeklyPay ETF (PLTW) currently has an AIQ Score of 43/100, indicating a neutral setup. Momentum is the strongest factor at 64/100. Risk resilience is the weakest current factor at 14/100. Performance, exposure, distribution, momentum, and risk evidence should be read together at the latest market-close snapshot.
In a neutral regime, PLTW has AIQ Score of 43/100 with Momentum base of 64/100 and fading Risk resilience at 14/100. Wait for component alignment before adding exposure.
Momentum (64/100) leads while Risk resilience (14/100) lags. This cross-factor spread creates entry timing uncertainty.
Financial Services · 5.50% ETF move · PLTW classified in Asset Management - Income.
Current Evidence
AlgovestIQ Evidence Summary
Current consensus, supporting evidence, recent changes, and what would strengthen or weaken the view.
Is PLTW Bullish or Bearish Right Now?
PLTW currently has a neutral overall setup. Momentum is the strongest factor at 64/100, while Risk Resilience is weakest at 14/100. The current evidence suggests a mixed rather than strongly bullish or bearish setup.
- - Momentum is constructive at 64/100.
- - Price is +4.49% above its 50-day SMA.
- - Technical consensus has more buy votes than sell votes (30 vs 8).
- - Risk Resilience is weak at 14/100.
Current Consensus
PLTW's Technical Analysis Consensus is currently Buy, with 30 buy, 7 neutral, and 8 sell votes. PLTW's 14-day RSI is 53.49, which places the ETF in a neutral momentum range. PLTW's beta is 0.37, indicating lower market sensitivity than the broad market.
What Changed in PLTW?
The largest recent change in PLTW is Risk Resilience moving down by 14.0 points over the available 7-day comparison window. Momentum remains the strongest visible factor.
What Would Change the PLTW Outlook?
The current neutral outlook could improve if AIQ moves above 70, momentum recovers, risk resilience improves, and price confirms a stronger trend above the 50-day and 200-day moving averages. It would weaken if AIQ falls below 40, price loses long-term moving-average support, distribution or liquidity context deteriorates, or risk evidence worsens.
AIQ > 70, RSI above 55, price above SMA-50/SMA-200, and positive market-context evidence.
AIQ below 40, RSI below 45, loss of SMA-200, negative revisions, or rising volatility and drawdown risk.
PLTW Decision Framework
Public evidence layers, setup checks, and risk context for Roundhill Investments - PLTR WeeklyPay ETF.
Roundhill Investments - PLTR WeeklyPay ETF (PLTW) ETF Analysis
Roundhill Investments - PLTR WeeklyPay ETF has an AIQ Score of 43/100 in a Neutral regime. Momentum is strongest at 64/100. Beta is 0.37, below market sensitivity. Review the supporting etf factors together before drawing a conclusion from any single score.
| Evidence Layer | Public Evidence |
|---|---|
| Regime Context | PLTW is in a Neutral AIQ regime with score 43/100. |
| Signal Conflict | The primary conflict is that momentum leads at 64/100 while risk lags at 14/100. |
| Factor Evidence | Momentum 64/100 · Quality 39/100 · Risk 14/100 |
| Persistence | Current snapshot evidence is shown; historical persistence remains in AIQ Pro. |
Current Setup Checklist
Momentum is the strongest factor at 64/100.
Momentum is 64/100 and RSI (14) is 53.5.
PLTW is in a Neutral regime at 43/100.
Risk factor is 14/100 with beta 0.37 and annual volatility 72.18%.
Current conflict: momentum leads at 64/100 while risk lags at 14/100.
PLTW Research Cluster
ETF-specific paths for performance, risk, distributions, market context, data, comparisons, and news.
PLTW ETF Analytics
PLTW holdings context, yield, risk, valuation exposure, momentum, and AIQ evidence.
PLTW Technical Analysis
PLTW technical setup based on RSI, MACD, moving averages, AIQ Momentum, volume, trend, volatility, and pivots.
PLTW ETF Market Context
Track PLTW market context, news pressure, trend changes, income events, and current allocation evidence.
PLTW Distribution Analysis
PLTW distribution yield, annualized distributions, payment history, and income context.
PLTW ETF Data
PLTW available fund data, market metrics, technical readings, risk measures, and AIQ evidence.
PLTW Risk Analysis
PLTW volatility, beta, drawdown, Sharpe ratio, VaR, and downside resilience.
PLTW ETF News
PLTW ETF news, market tone, recent headlines, and catalyst context.
PLTW vs Options Income / Covered Call Peers
Current peer cohort: PLTW · PLTY · QDTE · QQQI · QQQY. Compare AIQ, factor scores, Sharpe ratio and 1-year volatility in one indexable view.
| Peer | AIQ | Value | Momentum | Risk | Sharpe | 1Y Volatility | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PLTW Current ETF | 43/100 | — | 64/100 | 14/100 | -0.49 | 72.18% | Current |
| PLTY YieldMax PLTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 50/100 | — | 62/100 | 44/100 | -0.78 | 53.23% | PLTW vs PLTY |
| QDTE Roundhill Innovation-100 0DTE Covered Call Strategy ETF | 48/100 | — | 33/100 | 71/100 | -1.16 | 20.57% | PLTW vs QDTE |
| QQQI NEOS Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF | 48/100 | 32/100 | 28/100 | 81/100 | -0.26 | 17.12% | PLTW vs QQQI |
| QQQY Defiance Nasdaq 100 Enhanced Options Income ETF | 41/100 | 35/100 | 28/100 | 80/100 | -0.92 | 18.66% | PLTW vs QQQY |
Peer cohort is resolved dynamically from the AlgovestIQ universe taxonomy and Compare relationship graph. Data as of Oct 21, 2026.
About the AIQ Score
Methodology for the current ETF evidence.
The AlgovestIQ AIQ Score combines multiple dimensions of ETF evidence, including momentum, valuation exposure, quality, risk resilience, sentiment context, and timing signals. It is a descriptive research score, not a guarantee of future performance or a personalized recommendation.
View AIQ methodologyFactor Diagnostics
A compact bridge from the AIQ score to the evidence tabs.
Valuation exposure across the fund's holdings.
Quality context inferred from fund exposure and available evidence.
Trend, momentum, volume, and timing confirmation.
Resilience, volatility, beta, drawdown, and tail risk.
News and event pressure around the setup.
Open the return calculator with ETF context while purchase price, shares, dates and fees remain user inputs.
AIQ Component Profile
Compare the five component scores on one consistent 0–100 scale.
Review earnings timing, revisions, news pressure, and prior event reactions in one place.
Open catalystsNo quarterly financial rows in this snapshot.
Checked Oct 22, 2026
Explore factor drivers, conflicts, persistence, and scenario sensitivity in the advanced workspace.
ETF Analytics Snapshot
Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.
ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.
Market Confirmation
Technicals are summarized first, with the indicator library behind it.
Risk Alignment
Higher resilience is stronger; exposure metrics stay separate.
Continue Researching PLTW
Open the detailed evidence pages and workflows behind the stock overview read.
Premium Feature
Full AIQ Analysis
AIQ Intelligence
AIQ Pro for PLTW
Scenario Analysis
AIQ Scenario Builder
Portfolio Implication
Related Links
PLTW ETF FAQ
What is PLTW ETF price today?
PLTW is currently shown at $25.89. Use the live quote with the 52-week range and AIQ context before comparing funds.
What is PLTW's 52-week high and low?
PLTW's 52-week range is $15.00 to $50.90 based on the latest completed market-close snapshot from Oct 21, 2026. A price near either extreme should be evaluated with volatility and trend evidence.
Does PLTW pay a dividend?
PLTW's current distribution yield is 67.45% based on the latest completed market-close snapshot from Oct 21, 2026. For ETFs, dividend yield should be compared with expense ratio, holdings, and risk.
What should investors compare before buying PLTW?
Compare PLTW's price trend, expense profile, yield, holdings exposure, volatility, and AIQ signal. ETF decisions should focus on portfolio fit as much as current momentum.