Current etf page

ETF Analytics

SMDV ETF Holdings & Fundamentals

Fund Profile · Cost · Size · Liquidity · Exposure

Financial ServicesAsset Management - IncomeScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

SMDVProShares S&P SmallCap 600 Dividend Aristocrats ETF

Financial Services / Asset Management - Income

Low Priority

Relative Laggard

NeutralEdge 3/10
$72.97−$0.14 (−0.19%)

Latest quote

  • Momentum
    48
  • Value
    40
  • Quality
    42
  • Risk resilience
    78
  • Sentiment
    —
algovestiq.comScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

SMDV Holdings

101 holdings; the ten largest make up 12.09% of the fund. Holdings as of Sep 18, 2026.

Holdings
101
Top 10 weight
12.09%
Share of the fund in its ten largest positions
Largest holding
HNI
1.40%
Expense ratio
0.40%
$40.00 a year per $10,000
Fund size
$652.18M
Top sector
Financial Services
28.95%
Top 25 holdings by weight
RankSymbolHoldingWeightMarket value
1HNIHNI CORP1.40%$9.5M
2GICGLOBAL INDUSTRIAL CO1.27%$8.66M
3PRGOPERRIGO CO PLC1.24%$8.4M
4AGMFEDERAL AGRIC MTG CORP-CL C1.23%$8.36M
5EXPOEXPONENT INC1.20%$8.18M
6SCLSTEPAN CO1.18%$8.03M
7MATXMATSON INC1.18%$8.01M
8MSBIMIDLAND STATES BANCORP INC1.13%$7.71M
9AWRAMERICAN STATES WATER CO1.13%$7.66M
10CRAICRA INTERNATIONAL INC1.13%$7.65M
11CASSCASS INFORMATION SYSTEMS INC1.12%$7.62M
12HTOH2O AMERICA1.11%$7.57M
13YORWYORK WATER CO1.11%$7.56M
14AVNTAVIENT CORP1.11%$7.55M
15WLYWILEY (JOHN) & SONS-CLASS A1.10%$7.51M
16BHBBAR HARBOR BANKSHARES1.10%$7.48M
17ALRSALERUS FINANCIAL CORP1.10%$7.45M
18PEBOPEOPLES BANCORP INC1.09%$7.43M
19ALGALAMO GROUP INC1.09%$7.42M
20WSBCWESBANCO INC1.09%$7.39M
21CTBICOMMUNITY TRUST BANCORP INC1.09%$7.38M
22KWRQUAKER CHEMICAL CORPORATION1.08%$7.37M
23IOSPINNOSPEC INC1.08%$7.37M
24NBTBN B T BANCORP INC1.08%$7.33M
25TMPTOMPKINS FINANCIAL CORP1.07%$7.3M

SMDV Expense Ratio

SMDV charges 0.40% a year, about $40.00 for every $10,000 invested.

Yearly cost by amount invested
InvestedCost a year
$10,000$40.00
$25,000$100.00
$100,000$400.00

The fee is taken from the fund's assets rather than billed, so it shows up as slightly lower returns.

ETF Analytics Snapshot

Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.

Price
$72.97
As of Oct 21, 2026
Fund size
$652.18M
Expense ratio
0.40%
Distribution yield
2.42%
ProShares ETF evidence

ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.

Review ETF analytics
Holdings
101
NAV
$73.08
Average volume
99.72K
Inception
Feb 3, 2015
Asset class
Equity
Primary exposure
Financial Services (28.95%)
Beta
0.79
Momentum score
48/100

ETF Fundamentals Overview

Fund-native evidence replaces stock-only quarterly statement fields for ETF pages.

Fund profile

FieldValue
Fund nameProShares S&P SmallCap 600 Dividend Aristocrats ETF
IssuerProShares
Asset classEquity
Primary exposureFinancial Services (28.95%)
DomicileUS
Inception dateFeb 3, 2015
Websitehttps://www.proshares.com/our-etfs/strategic/smdv

Current ETF metrics

FieldValue
Fund size$652.18M
Expense ratio0.40%
Holdings count101
NAV$73.08
Average volume99.72K
Distribution yield2.42%
Beta0.79

ETF Exposure

Sector and country weights of the fund's holdings.

Sector exposure
FieldValue
Utilities12.48%
Financial Services28.95%
Real Estate3.81%
Basic Materials13.48%
Technology2.57%
Consumer Defensive5.38%
Consumer Cyclical1.67%
Communication Services1.47%
Country exposure
FieldValue
Other0.22%
United States96.21%
Ireland2.32%
Bermuda1.25%

ETF Risk-Adjusted Context

Risk and return-efficiency metrics sit beside fund structure rather than company financial statements.

AIQ Score
48/100

Composite research read.

Sharpe Ratio
0.42

Return per unit of total volatility.

Sortino Ratio
—

Return per unit of downside volatility.

Max Drawdown
-9.79%

Largest trailing drawdown in the risk window.

Momentum
48/100

Trend and price behavior.

Value Exposure
40/100

Relative valuation/exposure context.

Risk
78/100

Volatility and downside resilience.

Annual Volatility
13.86%

Annualized realized volatility.

ETF analytics context
How to read SMDV's ETF profile

Read cost, fund size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, distribution yield, and exposure together. ETF analytics should not be judged by company-only fields such as revenue, EPS, margins, or payout ratio when those rows are not applicable.

Analysis tools

Export and portfolio tools complement the ETF evidence above.

Fundamentals export

Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow

Unlock with Pro
Portfolio context

Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings

Unlock with Premium
Continue to SMDV AIQ Pro
See how ETF evidence contributes to the full analysis workspace.

How to Read a Fundamental Profile

Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.

The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.

Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.

Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.

How to Read This Table

  • Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
  • ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
  • Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
  • Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
  • FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
  • Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.

These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.

SMDV ETF Analytics FAQ

What is SMDV's expense ratio?

SMDV's expense ratio shows the annual fund cost when available. Compare it with holdings, tracking exposure, liquidity, dividend yield, and volatility.

What is SMDV's dividend yield?

SMDV's dividend or distribution yield helps investors compare income potential. It should be weighed against fund strategy, expense ratio, and risk.

How diversified is SMDV?

SMDV's diversification depends on holdings count, top-position concentration, and sector exposure. Fund size and liquidity do not automatically mean broad diversification.

Is SMDV overvalued or undervalued?

ETF valuation depends on the valuation of its underlying holdings, sector exposure, and market regime. Use fund fundamentals with risk and technical context.