Current etf page

ETF Analysis

United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) ETF Analysis

United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) ETF analysis covering performance, holdings context, risk, drawdowns, volatility, momentum, dividends, valuation exposure, and the current AlgovestIQ assessment.

UNG ETF Analysis Summary

United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) currently has an AIQ Score of 66/100, indicating a neutral setup. Momentum is the strongest factor at 72/100. Risk is the weakest current factor at 56/100. Performance, momentum, risk, distribution, and exposure evidence should be read together at the latest market-close snapshot.

Updated Sep 5, 2026 · Market-close data

UNG at a Glance

Crawlable current metrics from the latest market-close ETF snapshot.

MetricCurrent
Price$10.56
AIQ Score66/100
Overall ViewNeutral
Technical Analysis ConsensusBuy
Fund Size$575.14M
Expense Ratio1.17%
Holdings Count3
NAV$10.62
Asset ClassCommodities
Primary ExposureCash & Others (100.00%)
IssuerUSCF
DomicileUS
Inception DateApr 18, 2007
Distribution Yield0.00%
Beta1.7
Average Volume5.7M
52-week range$9.55-$17.03
RSI 1471.86
50-Day SMA$10.46
200-Day SMA$11.73
Risk Score56/100
Momentum Score72/100
Value Exposure Score
As of Sep 5, 2026 · Market close

UNG

Overview
United States Natural Gas Fund LP
Financial Services· Asset Management
AIQ Score
NeutralAIQ Edge 10/10
Leader
Sector Leader
Score data as of Sep 4, 2026
Last price
$10.56
+$0.07 (+0.67%)
Latest market quote
Momentum72
Value
Quality67
Risk Resilience56
Sentiment
View financial data

UNG ETF Analysis Summary

United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) currently has an AIQ Score of 66/100, indicating a neutral setup. Momentum is the strongest factor at 72/100. Risk resilience is the weakest current factor at 56/100. Performance, exposure, distribution, momentum, and risk evidence should be read together at the latest market-close snapshot.

Updated Sep 4, 2026 · Market-close data
AIQ Composite Posture: Mixed

In a neutral regime, UNG has AIQ Score of 66/100 with Momentum base of 72/100 and fading Risk resilience at 56/100. Wait for component alignment before adding exposure.

Financial Services · 0.67% ETF move · UNG classified in Asset Management.

Current Evidence

NeutralUNG is in a neutral AIQ regime; Momentum is the strongest visible factor at 72/100.
Core coverage reflects visible evidence only

AlgovestIQ Evidence Summary

Current consensus, supporting evidence, recent changes, and what would strengthen or weaken the view.

Is UNG Bullish or Bearish Right Now?

UNG currently has a neutral overall setup. Momentum is the strongest factor at 72/100, while Risk Resilience is weakest at 56/100. The current evidence suggests a mixed rather than strongly bullish or bearish setup.

Bull Case
  • - Quality is supportive at 67/100.
  • - Momentum is constructive at 72/100.
  • - Price is +0.95% above its 50-day SMA.
  • - Technical consensus has more buy votes than sell votes (29 vs 12).
Bear Case
  • - Price is -9.98% below its 200-day SMA.

Current Consensus

UNG's Technical Analysis Consensus is currently Buy, with 29 buy, 4 neutral, and 12 sell votes. UNG's 14-day RSI is 71.86, which places the ETF in an overbought momentum range. UNG's beta is 1.7, indicating greater market sensitivity than the broad market.

Signal Confidence
High agreement

What Changed in UNG?

Recent score-change history is not available in the current snapshot. These are the latest market-close scores instead.

AIQ Score
66/100
Momentum
72/100
Quality
67/100
Risk
56/100

What Would Change the UNG Outlook?

The current neutral outlook could improve if AIQ moves above 70, momentum recovers, risk resilience improves, and price confirms a stronger trend above the 50-day and 200-day moving averages. It would weaken if AIQ falls below 40, price loses long-term moving-average support, distribution or liquidity context deteriorates, or risk evidence worsens.

Bullish confirmation

AIQ > 70, RSI above 55, price above SMA-50/SMA-200, and positive market-context evidence.

Bearish deterioration

AIQ below 40, RSI below 45, loss of SMA-200, negative revisions, or rising volatility and drawdown risk.

UNG Decision Framework

Public evidence layers, setup checks, and risk context for United States Natural Gas Fund LP.

United States Natural Gas Fund LP (UNG) ETF Analysis

United States Natural Gas Fund LP has an AIQ Score of 66/100 in a Neutral regime. Momentum is strongest at 72/100. Beta is 1.7, above market sensitivity. Review the supporting etf factors together before drawing a conclusion from any single score.

Evidence LayerPublic Evidence
Regime ContextUNG is in a Neutral AIQ regime with score 66/100.
Signal ConflictThe primary conflict is that momentum leads at 72/100 while risk lags at 56/100.
Factor EvidenceMomentum 72/100 · Quality 67/100 · Risk 56/100
PersistenceCurrent snapshot evidence is shown; historical persistence remains in AIQ Pro.

Current Setup Checklist

Factor strengthPass

Momentum is the strongest factor at 72/100.

TimingPass

Momentum is 72/100 and RSI (14) is 71.9.

Regime fitPass

UNG is in a Neutral regime at 66/100.

Risk controlWait

Risk factor is 56/100 with beta 1.7 and annual volatility 58.45%.

ConflictPass

Current conflict: momentum leads at 72/100 while risk lags at 56/100.

AIQ Score
66/100
Price
$10.56
Beta
1.7
RSI (14)
71.9

UNG Research Cluster

ETF-specific paths for performance, risk, distributions, market context, data, comparisons, and news.

UNG ETF Analytics

UNG holdings context, yield, risk, valuation exposure, momentum, and AIQ evidence.

Fund size
$575.14M
Expense ratio
1.17%
Distribution yield
0.00%
View UNG ETF analytics

UNG Technical Analysis

UNG technical setup based on RSI, MACD, moving averages, AIQ Momentum, volume, trend, volatility, and pivots.

Technical Analysis Consensus
Buy
RSI 14
71.86
Price vs SMA-50
+0.95%
View full UNG technical analysis

UNG ETF Market Context

Track UNG market context, news pressure, trend changes, income events, and current allocation evidence.

AIQ Score
66/100
Momentum
72/100
Primary exposure
Cash & Others (100.00%)
View UNG ETF context

UNG Distribution Analysis

UNG distribution yield, annualized distributions, payment history, and income context.

Dividend yield
0.00%
Annual dividend
Frequency
View UNG distribution history

UNG ETF Data

UNG available fund data, market metrics, technical readings, risk measures, and AIQ evidence.

Issuer
USCF
Holdings
3
NAV
$10.62
View UNG ETF data

UNG Risk Analysis

UNG volatility, beta, drawdown, Sharpe ratio, VaR, and downside resilience.

Beta
1.7
Risk score
56/100
Average volume
5.7M
View UNG risk analysis

UNG ETF News

UNG ETF news, market tone, recent headlines, and catalyst context.

News items
0
Updated
Sentiment
Read UNG ETF news

UNG vs Commodities Peers

Current peer cohort: UNG · USO · WEAT · CANE · COPX. Compare AIQ, factor scores, Sharpe ratio and 1-year volatility in one indexable view.

PeerAIQValueMomentumRiskSharpe1Y VolatilityCompare
UNG
Current ETF
66/10072/10056/100-0.1458.45%Current
USO
United States Oil Fund
64/10082/10020/1001.548.52%UNG vs USO
WEAT
Teucrium Wheat Fund
56/10074/10052/1000.9524.37%UNG vs WEAT
CANE
Teucrium Sugar Fund
60/10075/10072/10051/1000.2821.50%UNG vs CANE
COPX
Global X Copper Miners ETF
56/10049/10065/10045/1001.4246.81%UNG vs COPX
Pairwise Compare links: USO · WEAT · CANE · COPXUNG vs USOUNG vs WEATUNG vs CANEUNG vs COPXCompare cohort

Peer cohort is resolved dynamically from the AlgovestIQ universe taxonomy and Compare relationship graph. Data as of Sep 4, 2026.

About the AIQ Score

Methodology for the current ETF evidence.

As of Sep 5, 2026 · Market close

The AlgovestIQ AIQ Score combines multiple dimensions of ETF evidence, including momentum, valuation exposure, quality, risk resilience, sentiment context, and timing signals. It is a descriptive research score, not a guarantee of future performance or a personalized recommendation.

View AIQ methodology

Factor Diagnostics

A compact bridge from the AIQ score to the evidence tabs.

Calculator
Calculate a UNG ETF return scenario

Open the return calculator with ETF context while purchase price, shares, dates and fees remain user inputs.

Calculate ETF return

AIQ Component Profile

Compare the five component scores on one consistent 0–100 scale.

Catalyst preview

Review earnings timing, revisions, news pressure, and prior event reactions in one place.

Open catalysts
Quarterly evidence

8 recent quarterly periods are available for review.

Checked Sep 5, 2026

AIQ Pro

Explore factor drivers, conflicts, persistence, and scenario sensitivity in the advanced workspace.

ETF Analytics Snapshot

Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.

Price
$10.56
As of Sep 4, 2026
Fund size
$575.14M
Expense ratio
1.17%
Distribution yield
0.00%
USCF ETF evidence

ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.

Review ETF analytics
Holdings
3
NAV
$10.62
Average volume
5.7M
Inception
Apr 18, 2007
Asset class
Commodities
Primary exposure
Cash & Others (100.00%)
Beta
1.7
Momentum score
72/100

Market Confirmation

Technicals are summarized first, with the indicator library behind it.

Trend
Mixed
Momentum
Bullish
RSI 14
71.86
MACD
0.07

Risk Alignment

Higher resilience is stronger; exposure metrics stay separate.

Resilience
56/100
Beta
1.7
Annual volatility
58.45%
Max drawdown
-43.02%

UNG ETF FAQ

What is UNG ETF price today?

UNG is currently shown at $10.56. Use the live quote with the 52-week range and AIQ context before comparing funds.

What is UNG's 52-week high and low?

UNG's 52-week range is $9.55 to $17.03 based on the latest completed market-close snapshot from Sep 4, 2026. A price near either extreme should be evaluated with volatility and trend evidence.

Does UNG pay a dividend?

UNG's current distribution yield is 0.00% based on the latest completed market-close snapshot from Sep 4, 2026. For ETFs, dividend yield should be compared with expense ratio, holdings, and risk.

What should investors compare before buying UNG?

Compare UNG's price trend, expense profile, yield, holdings exposure, volatility, and AIQ signal. ETF decisions should focus on portfolio fit as much as current momentum.