ETF Analytics
VXUS Expense Ratio, Cost per Year, Holdings and Country Weights
Fund Profile · Cost · Size · Liquidity · Exposure
VXUSVanguard Total International Stock ETF
Financial Services / Asset Management - Global
Relative Leader / Watch
Strong Relative Position
Latest quote
- Momentum45
- Value59
- Quality76
- Risk resilience83
- Sentiment—
VXUS answer
VXUS, the Vanguard Total International Stock ETF, has an expense ratio of 0.05%: about $5.00 a year for every $10,000 invested. The fee is taken from the fund's assets rather than billed, so it shows up as slightly lower returns. VXUS holds 8,821 stocks outside the United States, with its largest country weights in Japan (16.1%), Taiwan (9.3%), United Kingdom (8.1%). Its largest positions are Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd (4.0%), Samsung Electronics Co Ltd (1.8%), ASML Holding NV (1.4%), SK hynix Inc (1.4%), Tencent Holdings Ltd (0.9%).
- Expense ratio
- 0.05%
- Fund size
- $652.72B
- Holdings
- 8,821
- Top countries
- Japan (16.1%), Taiwan (9.3%), United Kingdom (8.1%)
- Top sectors
- Financial Services (22.2%), Technology (20.9%), Industrials (14.3%)
- Largest holdings
- Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd, Samsung Electronics Co Ltd, ASML Holding NV
VXUS Holdings
8,821 holdings; the ten largest make up 12.94% of the fund. Holdings as of Sep 11, 2026.
- Holdings
- 8,821
- Top 10 weight
- 12.94%
- Share of the fund in its ten largest positions
- Largest holding
- 2330.TW
- 4.02%
- Expense ratio
- 0.05%
- $5.00 a year per $10,000
- Fund size
- $652.72B
- Top sector
- Financial Services
- 22.23%
| Rank | Symbol | Holding | Weight | Market value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2330.TW | Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 4.02% | $26.45B |
| 2 | 005930.KS | Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | 1.80% | $11.83B |
| 3 | SLCMT1142 | 1.68% | $11.05B | |
| 4 | ASML.AS | ASML Holding NV | 1.42% | $9.35B |
| 5 | 000660.KS | SK hynix Inc | 1.41% | $9.27B |
| 6 | 0700.HK | Tencent Holdings Ltd | 0.85% | $5.62B |
| 7 | HSBA.L | HSBC Holdings PLC | 0.82% | $5.37B |
| 8 | MKTLIQ 12/31/2049 | 0.76% | $5.02B | |
| 9 | ROP.SW | Roche Holding AG | 0.69% | $4.53B |
| 10 | RY.TO | Royal Bank of Canada | 0.66% | $4.31B |
| 11 | NOVN.SW | Novartis AG | 0.65% | $4.29B |
| 12 | 9988.HK | Alibaba Group Holding Ltd | 0.62% | $4.1B |
| 13 | SHEL.L | Shell PLC | 0.57% | $3.78B |
| 14 | NESN.SW | Nestle SA | 0.57% | $3.78B |
| 15 | AZN.L | AstraZeneca PLC | 0.57% | $3.75B |
| 16 | 8306.T | Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group Inc | 0.54% | $3.57B |
| 17 | SIE.DE | Siemens AG | 0.54% | $3.54B |
| 18 | CBA.AX | Commonwealth Bank of Australia | 0.47% | $3.07B |
| 19 | SAN.MC | Banco Santander SA | 0.46% | $3.03B |
| 20 | 7203.T | Toyota Motor Corp | 0.45% | $2.98B |
| 21 | TD.TO | Toronto-Dominion Bank/The | 0.45% | $2.95B |
| 22 | ALV.DE | Allianz SE | 0.42% | $2.79B |
| 23 | SAP.DE | SAP SE | 0.42% | $2.78B |
| 24 | SU.PA | Schneider Electric SE | 0.41% | $2.68B |
| 25 | TTE.PA | TotalEnergies SE | 0.38% | $2.49B |
VXUS Expense Ratio
VXUS charges 0.05% a year, about $5.00 for every $10,000 invested.
| Invested | Cost a year |
|---|---|
| $10,000 | $5.00 |
| $25,000 | $12.50 |
| $100,000 | $50.00 |
The fee is taken from the fund's assets rather than billed, so it shows up as slightly lower returns.
| Fund | Expense ratio | Per $10,000 | Comparison |
|---|---|---|---|
| VXUS | 0.05% | $5.00 | |
| VTI | 0.03% | $3.00 | VXUS vs VTI |
| VEA | 0.03% | $3.00 | VXUS vs VEA |
| VT | 0.06% | $6.00 | VXUS vs VT |
ETF Analytics Snapshot
Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.
ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.
ETF Fundamentals Overview
Fund-native evidence replaces stock-only quarterly statement fields for ETF pages.
Fund profile
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Fund name | Vanguard Total International Stock ETF |
| Issuer | Vanguard |
| Asset class | International Equity |
| Primary exposure | Financial Services (22.23%) |
| Domicile | US |
| Inception date | Jan 26, 2011 |
| Website | https://investor.vanguard.com/investment-products/etfs/profile/vxus |
Current ETF metrics
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Fund size | $652.72B |
| Expense ratio | 0.05% |
| Holdings count | 8,821 |
| NAV | $84.00 |
| Average volume | 5.44M |
| Distribution yield | 2.37% |
| Beta | 0.92 |
ETF Exposure
Sector and country weights of the fund's holdings.
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| Basic Materials | 7.27% |
| Industrials | 14.33% |
| Technology | 20.85% |
| Consumer Defensive | 4.59% |
| Communication Services | 3.92% |
| Energy | 4.46% |
| Financial Services | 22.23% |
| Healthcare | 6.60% |
| Field | Value |
|---|---|
| India | 4.25% |
| Brazil | 1.19% |
| Turkey | 0.21% |
| Poland | 0.40% |
| Denmark | 0.93% |
| Iceland | 0.02% |
| Qatar | 0.15% |
| Norway | 0.52% |
ETF Risk-Adjusted Context
Risk and return-efficiency metrics sit beside fund structure rather than company financial statements.
Composite research read.
Return per unit of total volatility.
Return per unit of downside volatility.
Largest trailing drawdown in the risk window.
Trend and price behavior.
Relative valuation/exposure context.
Volatility and downside resilience.
Annualized realized volatility.
Read cost, fund size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, distribution yield, and exposure together. ETF analytics should not be judged by company-only fields such as revenue, EPS, margins, or payout ratio when those rows are not applicable.
Analysis tools
Export and portfolio tools complement the ETF evidence above.
Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow
Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings
Related Links
How to Read a Fundamental Profile
Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.
The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.
Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.
Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.
How to Read This Table
- Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
- ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
- Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
- Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
- FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
- Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.
These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.
VXUS Holdings FAQ
What is VXUS's expense ratio?
VXUS's expense ratio is 0.05% a year, about $5.00 a year for every $10,000 invested.
How much does VXUS cost per year?
At an expense ratio of 0.05%, VXUS costs about $5.00 a year for every $10,000 invested. The fee comes out of the fund's assets rather than being billed.
What countries does VXUS invest in?
VXUS spreads across developed and emerging markets outside the U.S.; its largest country weights are Japan (16.1%), Taiwan (9.3%), United Kingdom (8.1%).