Top Value Stocks Today

Stocks ranked by AIQ Value sub-score — price attractiveness relative to earnings, revenue, and free cash flow. Updated every market day.

Today's Market Pulse

Top Value Stocks: EmergingMarket closed

Average Value held near 53.4; Financial Services holds 18% of positions (broad leadership).

Avg Value

53.4

7D Value change

Signal breadth

New entrants

Concentration

18%

Data as of 2026-07-24, market close · 50 symbols · Methodology v1.0

Today's Ranking

RankTickerSectorAIQValueQualityRiskΔ1dState
1ZIMIndustrials57754545new
2DXCTechnology51752943new
3BDTXHealthcare58737638new
4LNCFinancial Services65734272new
5BHCHealthcare50726026new
6AEGFinancial Services71716774new
7MOHHealthcare39693038new
8HUMHealthcare50683351new
9BANDTechnology39652119new
10JKSTechnology3365135new
11STLAConsumer Cyclical56655959new
12HTZIndustrials54657525new
13NWLConsumer Defensive42651535new
14CNCHealthcare46652146new
15JBLUIndustrials36651521new
16GTConsumer Cyclical4365840new
17HUNBasic Materials48652138new
18PSXEnergy60653656new
19CHGGConsumer Defensive49654723new
20FMCBasic Materials40651737new
21CLFBasic Materials47651030newStrong Momentum / Elevated Risk
22FConsumer Cyclical4165340new
23GLXYFinancial Services44654223new
24DOWBasic Materials45651451new
25COTYConsumer Defensive56644338new
26DNUTConsumer Cyclical3264626new
27CEIXEnergy54643181new
28PTENEnergy50642644new
29CZRConsumer Cyclical46642041new
30LUMNCommunication Services47644433new
31CVEEnergy60634156new
32VODCommunication Services53632937new
33UAConsumer Cyclical47632728newStrong Momentum / Elevated Risk
34GMConsumer Cyclical4660848new
35QXOIndustrials40593334new
36RIGEnergy49593046new
37SPWREnergy55588439new
38LYVCommunication Services55576056new
39BLMNConsumer Cyclical36432723new
40PSKYCommunication Services33422743new
41ETHEFinancial Services49346035newStrong Momentum / Elevated Risk
42RKTFinancial Services40346042new
43ACHRIndustrials33343040new
44GBTCFinancial Services5406745new
45TMCBasic Materials3203042new
46UNGFinancial Services4807043new
47SLVFinancial Services5107237new
48PHYSFinancial Services5607258new
49RCKTHealthcare3102947new
50NNEIndustrials3003040new

State labels appear only when a stock meets a defined condition (New Leader, Consistent Leader, Accelerating, Momentum Divergence, Losing Leadership, Strong Momentum / Elevated Risk). Most rows carry no label on most days — that is by design, so labels stay meaningful.

Why these stocks rank highly

ZIMZIM ranks #1 with a Value score of 75.

DXCDXC ranks #2 with a Value score of 75.

BDTXBDTX ranks #3 with a Value score of 73.

LNCLNC ranks #4 with a Value score of 73.

BHCBHC ranks #5 with a Value score of 72.

Why this matters

Takeaway: Value is holding steady.

Leadership concentration is broad: Financial Services accounts for 18% of the list. Leadership spread across sectors reduces the impact of any single-sector rotation.

What to watch next

1Not confirmed

Whether ZIM holds the #1 position — leaders that hold the top spot across multiple sessions carry more signal than single-day appearances.

2Not confirmed

Whether Financial Services's 18% share of the list expands past 50% — that would shift leadership from broad to concentrated.

What the Value score actually compares

The AIQ Value sub-score measures price attractiveness relative to fundamentals — earnings, revenue, and free cash flow — normalized against sector peers rather than the whole market. That peer normalization is the important design choice: a bank at 11x earnings and a software company at 28x can both score well if each is cheap for its sector's economics. Absolute-multiple screens systematically load up on structurally cheap sectors; this one doesn't.

The other structural defense in this ranking is the composite context shown alongside: the classic failure mode of value screens is the value trap — statistically cheap because the business is deteriorating. Displaying Quality and Momentum beside the Value score makes the distinction visible line by line: cheap-and-durable reads very differently from cheap-and-decaying, and both will appear here.

How to use this list

The strongest historical profile on a list like this is cheapness plus a catalyst — improving momentum on an attractively valued name suggests the market has begun re-rating it. Names ranking high on Value with flat momentum are patience trades; names high on Value with improving momentum are re-ratings in progress. The Δ1d column and the risers panel above surface the second group daily.

FAQ

Why does the list disagree with famous value-investor holdings?

This is a quantitative sector-relative ranking updated daily, not a concentrated judgment portfolio. It will surface statistically cheap names an active manager would reject on business grounds — the Quality column is the fastest way to apply that filter yourself.

Value has underperformed for years — why rank it at all?

The value premium is cyclical, and its leadership phases have historically arrived abruptly around rate and regime turns. A daily ranking exists precisely so the rotation is visible when it starts, rather than in quarter-delayed fund letters.

Go deeper

© 2026 AlgoVestIQTermsPrivacyRisk Disclosure

Informational only, not investment advice. Investing involves risk, including loss of principal.