ETF Analysis
State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) ETF Analysis
State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) ETF analysis covering performance, holdings context, risk, drawdowns, volatility, momentum, dividends, valuation exposure, and the current AlgovestIQ assessment.
State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) currently has an AIQ Score of 61/100, indicating a neutral setup. Risk is the strongest factor at 83/100. Momentum is the weakest current factor at 43/100. Performance, momentum, risk, distribution, and exposure evidence should be read together at the latest market-close snapshot.
JNK at a Glance
Crawlable current metrics from the latest market-close ETF snapshot.
| Metric | Current |
|---|---|
| Price | $92.39 |
| AIQ Score | 61/100 |
| Overall View | Neutral |
| Technical Analysis Consensus | Strong Sell |
| Fund Size | $7.09B |
| Expense Ratio | 0.40% |
| Holdings Count | 1,154 |
| NAV | $92.24 |
| Asset Class | Fixed Income |
| Primary Exposure | Cash & Others (100.00%) |
| Issuer | SPDR |
| Domicile | US |
| Inception Date | Nov 28, 2007 |
| Distribution Yield | 6.86% |
| Beta | 0.67 |
| Average Volume | 3.3M |
| 52-week range | $91.71-$98.03 |
| RSI 14 | 51.75 |
| 50-Day SMA | $94.28 |
| 200-Day SMA | $95.90 |
| Risk Score | 83/100 |
| Momentum Score | 43/100 |
| Value Exposure Score | 63/100 |
JNK Long-Horizon ETF Performance
Trailing returns, growth of $10,000, drawdown history, and calendar-year returns from available daily closes.
| Period | Total return | Annualized | Max drawdown | Start date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | -5.35% | -5.35% | -5.80% | Oct 20, 2025 |
| 3Y | 4.70% | 1.54% | -6.71% | Oct 20, 2023 |
| 5Y | -15.10% | -3.23% | -19.99% | Oct 25, 2021 |
| 10Y | -15.10% | -3.23% | -19.99% | Oct 25, 2021 |
Growth of $10,000
Indexed to the first available close in this history window.
Drawdown History
Peak-to-trough decline from each prior high over the available window.
Calendar-Year Returns
Full-year returns where available, with the current calendar year shown as YTD.
JNKState Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF
Financial Services / Asset Management - Bonds
Relative Leader / Watch
Strong Relative Position
Latest quote
- Momentum43
- Value63
- Quality63
- Risk resilience83
- Sentiment—
JNK ETF Analysis Summary
State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) currently has an AIQ Score of 61/100, indicating a neutral setup. Risk resilience is the strongest factor at 83/100. Momentum is the weakest current factor at 43/100. Performance, exposure, distribution, momentum, and risk evidence should be read together at the latest market-close snapshot.
In a neutral regime, JNK has AIQ Score of 61/100 with Risk resilience base of 83/100 and fading Momentum at 43/100. Wait for component alignment before adding exposure.
Risk resilience (83/100) leads while Momentum (43/100) lags. This cross-factor spread creates entry timing uncertainty.
Financial Services · 0.16% ETF move · JNK classified in Asset Management - Bonds.
Current Evidence
AlgovestIQ Evidence Summary
Current consensus, supporting evidence, recent changes, and what would strengthen or weaken the view.
Is JNK Bullish or Bearish Right Now?
JNK currently has a neutral overall setup. Risk Resilience is the strongest factor at 83/100, while Momentum is weakest at 43/100. The current evidence suggests a mixed rather than strongly bullish or bearish setup.
- - Quality is supportive at 63/100.
- - Risk Resilience is supportive at 83/100.
- - Momentum is weak at 43/100.
- - Price is -3.66% below its 200-day SMA.
- - Technical consensus has more sell votes than buy votes (30 vs 5).
Current Consensus
JNK's Technical Analysis Consensus is currently Strong Sell, with 5 buy, 10 neutral, and 30 sell votes. JNK's 14-day RSI is 51.75, which places the ETF in a neutral momentum range. JNK's beta is 0.67, indicating lower market sensitivity than the broad market.
What Changed in JNK?
The largest recent change in JNK is Momentum moving up by 18.0 points over the available 7-day comparison window. Risk Resilience remains the strongest visible factor.
What Would Change the JNK Outlook?
The current neutral outlook could improve if AIQ moves above 70, momentum recovers, risk resilience improves, and price confirms a stronger trend above the 50-day and 200-day moving averages. It would weaken if AIQ falls below 40, price loses long-term moving-average support, distribution or liquidity context deteriorates, or risk evidence worsens.
AIQ > 70, RSI above 55, price above SMA-50/SMA-200, and positive market-context evidence.
AIQ below 40, RSI below 45, loss of SMA-200, negative revisions, or rising volatility and drawdown risk.
JNK Decision Framework
Public evidence layers, setup checks, and risk context for State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF.
State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF (JNK) ETF Analysis
State Street SPDR Bloomberg High Yield Bond ETF has an AIQ Score of 61/100 in a Neutral regime. Risk is strongest at 83/100. Beta is 0.67, below market sensitivity. Review the supporting etf factors together before drawing a conclusion from any single score.
| Evidence Layer | Public Evidence |
|---|---|
| Regime Context | JNK is in a Neutral AIQ regime with score 61/100. |
| Signal Conflict | The primary conflict is that risk leads at 83/100 while momentum lags at 43/100. |
| Factor Evidence | Momentum 43/100 · Value 63/100 · Quality 63/100 · Risk 83/100 |
| Persistence | Current snapshot evidence is shown; historical persistence remains in AIQ Pro. |
Current Setup Checklist
Risk is the strongest factor at 83/100.
Momentum is 43/100 and RSI (14) is 51.8.
JNK is in a Neutral regime at 61/100.
Risk factor is 83/100 with beta 0.67 and annual volatility 4.23%.
Current conflict: risk leads at 83/100 while momentum lags at 43/100.
JNK Research Cluster
ETF-specific paths for performance, risk, distributions, market context, data, comparisons, and news.
JNK ETF Analytics
JNK holdings context, yield, risk, valuation exposure, momentum, and AIQ evidence.
JNK Technical Analysis
JNK technical setup based on RSI, MACD, moving averages, AIQ Momentum, volume, trend, volatility, and pivots.
JNK ETF Market Context
Track JNK market context, news pressure, trend changes, income events, and current allocation evidence.
JNK Distribution Analysis
JNK distribution yield, annualized distributions, payment history, and income context.
JNK ETF Data
JNK available fund data, market metrics, technical readings, risk measures, and AIQ evidence.
JNK Risk Analysis
JNK volatility, beta, drawdown, Sharpe ratio, VaR, and downside resilience.
JNK ETF News
JNK ETF news, market tone, recent headlines, and catalyst context.
JNK vs Fixed Income — Credit & Aggregate Peers
Current peer cohort: JNK · JPIE · JPST · LQD · MBB. Compare AIQ, factor scores, Sharpe ratio and 1-year volatility in one indexable view.
| Peer | AIQ | Value | Momentum | Risk | Sharpe | 1Y Volatility | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| JNK Current ETF | 61/100 | 63/100 | 43/100 | 83/100 | -2.17 | 4.23% | Current |
| JPIE JPMorgan Income ETF | 55/100 | 36/100 | 58/100 | 77/100 | -2.98 | 2.42% | JNK vs JPIE |
| JPST JPMorgan Ultra-Short Income ETF | 56/100 | 36/100 | 58/100 | 67/100 | -3.6 | 1.30% | JNK vs JPST |
| LQD iShares iBoxx Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF | 65/100 | 55/100 | 58/100 | 81/100 | -2.16 | 5.76% | JNK vs LQD |
| MBB iShares MBS ETF | 61/100 | 45/100 | 56/100 | 87/100 | -1.91 | 5.05% | JNK vs MBB |
Peer cohort is resolved dynamically from the AlgovestIQ universe taxonomy and Compare relationship graph. Data as of Oct 21, 2026.
About the AIQ Score
Methodology for the current ETF evidence.
The AlgovestIQ AIQ Score combines multiple dimensions of ETF evidence, including momentum, valuation exposure, quality, risk resilience, sentiment context, and timing signals. It is a descriptive research score, not a guarantee of future performance or a personalized recommendation.
View AIQ methodologyFactor Diagnostics
A compact bridge from the AIQ score to the evidence tabs.
Valuation exposure across the fund's holdings.
Quality context inferred from fund exposure and available evidence.
Trend, momentum, volume, and timing confirmation.
Resilience, volatility, beta, drawdown, and tail risk.
News and event pressure around the setup.
Open the return calculator with ETF context while purchase price, shares, dates and fees remain user inputs.
AIQ Component Profile
Compare the five component scores on one consistent 0–100 scale.
Review earnings timing, revisions, news pressure, and prior event reactions in one place.
Open catalystsNo quarterly financial rows in this snapshot.
Checked Oct 22, 2026
Explore factor drivers, conflicts, persistence, and scenario sensitivity in the advanced workspace.
ETF Analytics Snapshot
Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.
ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.
Market Confirmation
Technicals are summarized first, with the indicator library behind it.
Risk Alignment
Higher resilience is stronger; exposure metrics stay separate.
Continue Researching JNK
Open the detailed evidence pages and workflows behind the stock overview read.
Premium Feature
Full AIQ Analysis
AIQ Intelligence
AIQ Pro for JNK
Scenario Analysis
AIQ Scenario Builder
Portfolio Implication
Related Links
JNK ETF FAQ
What is JNK ETF price today?
JNK is currently shown at $92.39. Use the live quote with the 52-week range and AIQ context before comparing funds.
What is JNK's 52-week high and low?
JNK's 52-week range is $91.71 to $98.03 based on the latest completed market-close snapshot from Oct 21, 2026. A price near either extreme should be evaluated with volatility and trend evidence.
Does JNK pay a dividend?
JNK's current distribution yield is 6.86% based on the latest completed market-close snapshot from Oct 21, 2026. For ETFs, dividend yield should be compared with expense ratio, holdings, and risk.
What should investors compare before buying JNK?
Compare JNK's price trend, expense profile, yield, holdings exposure, volatility, and AIQ signal. ETF decisions should focus on portfolio fit as much as current momentum.