Current etf page

ETF Analytics

LQD ETF Holdings & Fundamentals

Fund Profile · Cost · Size · Liquidity · Exposure

Financial ServicesAsset Management - BondsScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

LQDiShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF

Financial Services / Asset Management - Bonds

Leader

Strong Relative Position

NeutralEdge 9/10
$103.21−$0.01 (−0.01%)

Latest quote

  • Momentum
    58
  • Value
    55
  • Quality
    74
  • Risk resilience
    81
  • Sentiment
    —
algovestiq.comScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

LQD Holdings

3,158 holdings; the ten largest make up 1.62% of the fund. Holdings as of Sep 11, 2026.

Holdings
3,158
Top 10 weight
1.62%
Share of the fund in its ten largest positions
Largest holding
ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 4.90% 02/01/2046
0.19%
Expense ratio
0.14%
$14.00 a year per $10,000
Fund size
$28.78B
Top sector
Banking
23.02%
Top 25 holdings by weight
RankSymbolHoldingWeightMarket value
1BLK CSH FND TREASURY SL AGENCY0.83%$244.83M
2USD CASH0.30%-$90.28M
3ANHEUSER-BUSCH COMPANIES LLC 4.90% 02/01/20460.19%$57.19M
4T-MOBILE USA INC 3.88% 04/15/20300.18%$54.82M
5CVS HEALTH CORP 5.05% 03/25/20480.18%$52.9M
6SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 144A 5.35% 07/15/20310.17%$51M
7META PLATFORMS INC 4.88% 11/15/20350.16%$46.35M
8GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC/THE 6.75% 10/01/20370.15%$44.15M
9PFIZER INVESTMENT ENTERPRISES PTE 5.30% 05/19/20530.15%$43.88M
10AMAZON.COM INC 4.88% 03/13/20360.15%$43.65M
11META PLATFORMS INC 6.30% 05/15/20560.14%$42.64M
12META PLATFORMS INC 5.25% 05/15/20360.14%$41.99M
13SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 144A 5.65% 07/15/20330.14%$41.99M
14BOEING CO 5.80% 05/01/20500.14%$41.09M
15AMAZON.COM INC 4.80% 07/09/20310.14%$40.63M
16AMAZON.COM INC 5.80% 03/13/20560.14%$40.48M
17SPACE EXPLORATION TECHNOLOGIES COR 144A 5.88% 07/15/20360.14%$40.59M
18BANK OF AMERICA CORP MTN 5.01% 07/22/20330.14%$40.11M
19META PLATFORMS INC 5.63% 11/15/20550.14%$40.21M
20BANK OF AMERICA CORP MTN 5.47% 01/23/20350.14%$40.13M
21ALPHABET INC 6.38% 08/15/20560.13%$39.29M
22ABBVIE INC 3.20% 11/21/20290.13%$38.31M
23BANK OF AMERICA CORP MTN 5.29% 04/25/20340.13%$37.42M
24BOEING CO 5.15% 05/01/20300.13%$37.27M
25GOLDMAN SACHS GROUP INC/THE MTN 5.24% 07/21/20320.12%$36.55M

LQD Expense Ratio

LQD charges 0.14% a year, about $14.00 for every $10,000 invested.

Yearly cost by amount invested
InvestedCost a year
$10,000$14.00
$25,000$35.00
$100,000$140.00

The fee is taken from the fund's assets rather than billed, so it shows up as slightly lower returns.

ETF Analytics Snapshot

Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.

Price
$103.21
As of Oct 21, 2026
Fund size
$28.78B
Expense ratio
0.14%
Distribution yield
4.91%
IShares ETF evidence

ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.

Review ETF analytics
Holdings
3,158
NAV
$103.16
Average volume
30.29M
Inception
Jul 22, 2002
Asset class
Fixed Income
Primary exposure
Banking (23.02%)
Beta
1.34
Momentum score
58/100

ETF Fundamentals Overview

Fund-native evidence replaces stock-only quarterly statement fields for ETF pages.

Fund profile

FieldValue
Fund nameiShares iBoxx $ Investment Grade Corporate Bond ETF
IssuerIShares
Asset classFixed Income
Primary exposureBanking (23.02%)
DomicileUS
Inception dateJul 22, 2002
Websitehttps://www.ishares.com/ch/professionals/en/products/239566/ishares-iboxx-investment-grade-corporate-bond-etf

Current ETF metrics

FieldValue
Fund size$28.78B
Expense ratio0.14%
Holdings count3,158
NAV$103.16
Average volume30.29M
Distribution yield4.91%
Beta1.34

ETF Exposure

Sector and country weights of the fund's holdings.

Sector exposure
FieldValue
Banking23.02%
Utility Other0.10%
Reits0.86%
Insurance4.30%
Consumer Cyclical7.56%
Capital Goods4.74%
Cash and/or Derivatives0.81%
Basic Industry1.64%
Country exposure
FieldValue
Canada2.36%
Japan1.97%
France0.42%
Norway0.09%
Singapore0.55%
Switzerland0.08%
Luxembourg0.39%
Other1.08%

ETF Risk-Adjusted Context

Risk and return-efficiency metrics sit beside fund structure rather than company financial statements.

AIQ Score
65/100

Composite research read.

Sharpe Ratio
-2.16

Return per unit of total volatility.

Sortino Ratio
—

Return per unit of downside volatility.

Max Drawdown
-9.82%

Largest trailing drawdown in the risk window.

Momentum
58/100

Trend and price behavior.

Value Exposure
55/100

Relative valuation/exposure context.

Risk
81/100

Volatility and downside resilience.

Annual Volatility
5.76%

Annualized realized volatility.

ETF analytics context
How to read LQD's ETF profile

Read cost, fund size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, distribution yield, and exposure together. ETF analytics should not be judged by company-only fields such as revenue, EPS, margins, or payout ratio when those rows are not applicable.

Analysis tools

Export and portfolio tools complement the ETF evidence above.

Fundamentals export

Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow

Unlock with Pro
Portfolio context

Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings

Unlock with Premium
Continue to LQD AIQ Pro
See how ETF evidence contributes to the full analysis workspace.

How to Read a Fundamental Profile

Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.

The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.

Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.

Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.

How to Read This Table

  • Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
  • ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
  • Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
  • Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
  • FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
  • Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.

These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.

LQD ETF Analytics FAQ

What is LQD's expense ratio?

LQD's expense ratio shows the annual fund cost when available. Compare it with holdings, tracking exposure, liquidity, dividend yield, and volatility.

What is LQD's dividend yield?

LQD's dividend or distribution yield helps investors compare income potential. It should be weighed against fund strategy, expense ratio, and risk.

How diversified is LQD?

LQD's diversification depends on holdings count, top-position concentration, and sector exposure. Fund size and liquidity do not automatically mean broad diversification.

Is LQD overvalued or undervalued?

ETF valuation depends on the valuation of its underlying holdings, sector exposure, and market regime. Use fund fundamentals with risk and technical context.