Current stock page

Fundamentals

MA Fundamental Analysis

Growth · Valuation · Profitability · AIQ Quality · AIQ Value

Financial ServicesFinancial - Credit ServicesScore data as of Sep 2, 2026

MA

Fundamentals
Mastercard Incorporated
Financial Services· Financial - Credit Services
AIQ Score
NeutralAIQ Edge 2/10
Low Priority
Relative Laggard
Score data as of Sep 2, 2026
Last price
$587.86
+$6.75 (+1.16%)
Latest market quote
Momentum70
Value24
Quality32
Risk Resilience59
Sentiment50
View financial data

Fundamentals Verdict

Value and quality should explain the score, not sit behind it.

P/E
30.83
As of Sep 1, 2026
Revenue growth
10.47%
Gross margin
82.74%
Debt / equity
4.39
Latest quarterly evidence

Latest period Jun 30, 2026.

Review fundamentals
Quarter revenue
$9.28B
Quarter net income
$4.39B
Quarter free cash flow
$3.3B

Fundamental Analysis Overview

Growth, valuation, profitability, AIQ Quality, and AIQ Value context stay together before the detailed statements.

Latest reported quarter

Jun 30, 2026

Review recent revenue, profitability, cash generation, and balance-sheet trends together with AIQ Value and AIQ Quality.

Quality score
32/100
Revenue
$9.28B
10.5% vs prior quarter
Gross profit
$8.97B
41.0% vs prior quarter
Net income
$4.39B
13.0% vs prior quarter
Free cash flow
$3.3B
15.8% vs prior quarter
Total assets
$57.69B
10.0% vs prior quarter
Total debt
$24.62B
29.9% vs prior quarter

AIQ Quality and Value bridge

Value24/100

Multiples, cash-flow yield, growth-adjusted valuation.

Quality32/100

Margins, returns, leverage, and cash conversion.

Balance risk59/100

Debt, beta, drawdown, and resilience context.

Quarterly Financial Trends

Performance, margins, cash generation, financial position, and valuation are separated so each trend keeps a meaningful scale.

Performance

Revenue shows business scale, while gross profit and net income show how that scale converts into earnings.

Income statement
Metric2026-06-302026-03-312025-12-312025-09-302025-06-302025-03-312024-12-312024-09-30
Revenue$9.28B$8.4B$8.81B$8.6B$8.13B$7.25B$7.49B$7.37B
Gross Profit$8.97B$6.36B$8.81B$6.71B$6.28B$5.56B$5.84B$5.47B
Operating Income
Net Income$4.39B$3.88B$4.06B$3.93B$3.7B$3.28B$3.34B$3.26B
EPS$4.98$4.35$4.53$4.35$4.07$3.6$3.64$3.54

Margins

Gross, net, and free-cash-flow margins show profitability and cash conversion as a share of revenue.

Quarterly margin history
Metric2026-06-302026-03-312025-12-312025-09-302025-06-302025-03-312024-12-312024-09-30
Gross margin96.67%75.74%100.00%77.99%77.23%76.72%77.93%74.23%
Net margin47.30%46.23%46.10%45.65%45.51%45.24%44.63%44.28%
FCF margin35.52%33.88%54.77%63.76%56.10%30.63%63.28%66.03%

Cash Flow

Operating cash flow, capital expenditure, and free cash flow reveal how reported earnings translate into available cash.

Cash flow statement
Metric2026-06-302026-03-312025-12-312025-09-302025-06-302025-03-312024-12-312024-09-30
Operating Cash Flow$3.77B$3B$4.94B$5.66B$4.6B$2.38B$4.83B$5.14B
Capital Expenditure-$478M-$154M-$112M-$178M-$40M-$159M-$95M-$270M
Free Cash Flow$3.3B$2.85B$4.82B$5.49B$4.56B$2.22B$4.74B$4.87B
Net Cash Provided By Operating Activities$3.77B$3B$4.94B$5.66B$4.6B$2.38B$4.83B$5.14B

Balance Sheet

Assets, liabilities, equity, and debt show the company's financial position and capital structure over time.

Balance sheet
Metric2026-06-302026-03-312025-12-312025-09-302025-06-302025-03-312024-12-312024-09-30
Total Assets$57.69B$52.45B$54.16B$53.29B$51.43B$48.47B$48.08B$47.24B
Total Debt$24.62B$18.96B$19B$19.02B$19.02B$18.87B$18.31B$18.5B
Cash And Cash Equivalents
Total Liabilities$52.09B$45.73B$46.41B$45.37B$43.56B$41.77B$41.57B$39.74B
Total Stockholders Equity$5.61B$6.72B$7.75B$7.92B$7.87B$6.7B$6.52B$7.5B

Valuation

P/E, P/B, and P/S show how the market's valuation of earnings, book value, and revenue changes across reporting periods.

Key financial metrics
Metric2026-06-302026-03-312025-12-312025-09-302025-06-302025-03-312024-12-312024-09-30
P/E ratio25.7828.7231.5332.734.4738.136.1234.92
P/B ratio80.7366.2366.1164.9864.9774.9374.4661.26
P/S ratio48.8353.0158.1559.7162.7468.9564.4861.85
Debt To Equity4.392.822.452.42.422.822.812.47
Free Cash Flow Yield
Financial ratios
Metric2026-06-302026-03-312025-12-312025-09-302025-06-302025-03-312024-12-312024-09-30
P/E ratio
P/B ratio80.7366.2366.1164.9864.9774.9374.4661.26
P/S ratio48.8353.0158.1559.7162.7468.9564.4861.85
Return On Equity78.20%57.75%52.41%49.68%47.13%49.17%51.53%43.86%
Debt To Equity

Current Fundamental Fields

Key valuation, growth, profitability, and leverage measures.

Pe
30.83
multipleSep 1, 2026
Pb
88.25
multipleSep 1, 2026
Revenue Growth Yoy
10.47
percentSep 1, 2026
EPS Growth Yoy
14.48
percentSep 1, 2026
Gross Margin
82.74
percentSep 1, 2026
Operating Margin
59.43
percentSep 1, 2026
ROE
232.46
percentSep 1, 2026
ROIC
47.81
percentSep 1, 2026
Debt To Equity
4.39
ratioSep 1, 2026
FCF Yield
3.34
percentSep 1, 2026
How to interpret the scores

Value and Quality are best interpreted alongside quarterly revenue, margin, free cash flow, ROE, ROIC, and leverage trends.

Current gross margin field: 82.74%. Current data as of Sep 1, 2026.

Fundamental context
How to read MA's fundamental profile

Connect valuation, business quality, growth, cash generation, and balance-sheet strength. Current evidence remains visible across tiers; expanded libraries and workflows are gated separately.

Valuation needs context

P/E and P/B are starting points, not verdicts. Compare them with the company's growth, margins, capital intensity, history, and relevant peers before deciding whether a multiple is demanding or attractive.

Quality connects profit and capital

Gross and operating margins describe the economics of the business. ROE and ROIC add the capital required to produce those profits, helping distinguish durable quality from accounting scale alone.

Growth should reach cash flow

Revenue and EPS growth are stronger when margins and free cash flow confirm them. Growth funded by rising leverage or dilution deserves a different interpretation from internally financed expansion.

Balance-sheet strength changes the range of outcomes

Debt-to-equity is most useful beside cash generation, cyclicality, and refinancing needs. The same leverage ratio can carry very different risk for stable and highly cyclical businesses.

Read the profile, not one metric

A useful fundamental conclusion requires several evidence families. No single ratio should become a buy, hold, or sell conclusion, and a missing field should never be treated as zero.

Dates and coverage matter

Fundamentals update on reporting schedules rather than tick by tick. Use reporting dates and labels to separate current evidence from fields not shown for the period.

Analysis tools

Export and peer tools complement the financial evidence above.

Fundamentals export

Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow

Unlock with Pro
Peer benchmarking

P/E attractiveness, ROIC percentile, peer rows · Curated peer group

Unlock with Premium
Portfolio context

Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings

Unlock with Premium
Continue to MA AIQ Pro
See how covered evidence contributes to the full analysis workspace.

How to Read a Fundamental Profile

Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.

The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.

Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.

Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.

How to Read This Table

  • Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
  • ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
  • Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
  • Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
  • FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
  • Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.

These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.

MA Fundamentals FAQ

What is MA's P/E ratio?

MA's P/E ratio compares stock price with earnings per share. It is one of the clearest valuation metrics, but it should be read with growth, margins, and cyclicality.

What is MA's forward P/E ratio?

MA's forward P/E uses expected earnings rather than trailing earnings. It is useful when earnings are changing quickly, but it depends on analyst estimates that can move.

What is MA's PEG ratio?

MA's PEG ratio relates valuation to expected growth. It can help compare growth stocks, but it is only as reliable as the growth assumptions behind it.

What is MA's price-to-sales ratio?

MA's price-to-sales ratio compares valuation with revenue. It is most useful when read with revenue growth, margins, profitability, and peer valuation multiples.

Is MA overvalued or undervalued?

MA's valuation should be judged with P/E, forward P/E, PEG, revenue growth, profitability, and balance-sheet strength. No single metric can prove overvaluation by itself.

How does MA's valuation compare with competitors?

MA's valuation comparison should use peer P/E, forward P/E, PEG, margins, growth, and risk. A higher multiple can be justified only if quality and growth support it.