ETF Analysis
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) ETF Analysis
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) ETF analysis covering performance, holdings context, risk, drawdowns, volatility, momentum, dividends, valuation exposure, and the current AlgovestIQ assessment.
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) currently has an AIQ Score of 52/100, indicating a neutral setup. Risk is the strongest factor at 67/100. Momentum is the weakest current factor at 32/100. Performance, momentum, risk, distribution, and exposure evidence should be read together at the latest market-close snapshot.
PICK at a Glance
Crawlable current metrics from the latest market-close ETF snapshot.
| Metric | Current |
|---|---|
| Price | $57.48 |
| AIQ Score | 52/100 |
| Overall View | Neutral |
| Technical Analysis Consensus | Strong Sell |
| Fund Size | $2.35B |
| Expense Ratio | 0.39% |
| Holdings Count | 284 |
| NAV | $57.83 |
| Asset Class | Equity |
| Primary Exposure | Diversified Metals & Mining (50.46%) |
| Issuer | IShares |
| Domicile | US |
| Inception Date | Jan 31, 2012 |
| Distribution Yield | 2.27% |
| Beta | 1.17 |
| Average Volume | 746.52K |
| 52-week range | $44.06-$69.02 |
| RSI 14 | 38.88 |
| 50-Day SMA | $62.14 |
| 200-Day SMA | $60.67 |
| Risk Score | 67/100 |
| Momentum Score | 32/100 |
| Value Exposure Score | — |
PICK Long-Horizon ETF Performance
Trailing returns, growth of $10,000, drawdown history, and calendar-year returns from available daily closes.
| Period | Total return | Annualized | Max drawdown | Start date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1Y | 24.89% | 24.91% | -19.54% | Oct 20, 2025 |
| 3Y | 57.33% | 16.30% | -34.45% | Oct 20, 2023 |
| 5Y | 31.75% | 5.69% | -42.66% | Oct 25, 2021 |
| 10Y | 31.75% | 5.69% | -42.66% | Oct 25, 2021 |
Growth of $10,000
Indexed to the first available close in this history window.
Drawdown History
Peak-to-trough decline from each prior high over the available window.
Calendar-Year Returns
Full-year returns where available, with the current calendar year shown as YTD.
PICKiShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF
Financial Services / Asset Management
Low Priority
In Line With Peers
Latest quote
- Momentum32
- Value—
- Quality62
- Risk resilience67
- Sentiment—
PICK ETF Analysis Summary
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) currently has an AIQ Score of 52/100, indicating a neutral setup. Risk resilience is the strongest factor at 67/100. Momentum is the weakest current factor at 32/100. Performance, exposure, distribution, momentum, and risk evidence should be read together at the latest market-close snapshot.
In a neutral regime, PICK has AIQ Score of 52/100 with Risk resilience base of 67/100 and fading Momentum at 32/100. Wait for component alignment before adding exposure.
Risk resilience (67/100) leads while Momentum (32/100) lags. This cross-factor spread creates entry timing uncertainty.
Financial Services · -0.64% ETF move · PICK classified in Asset Management.
Current Evidence
AlgovestIQ Evidence Summary
Current consensus, supporting evidence, recent changes, and what would strengthen or weaken the view.
Is PICK Bullish or Bearish Right Now?
PICK currently has a neutral overall setup. Risk Resilience is the strongest factor at 67/100, while Momentum is weakest at 32/100. The current evidence suggests a mixed rather than strongly bullish or bearish setup.
- - Quality is supportive at 62/100.
- - Risk Resilience is supportive at 67/100.
- - Momentum is weak at 32/100.
- - Price is -5.25% below its 200-day SMA.
- - Technical consensus has more sell votes than buy votes (37 vs 6).
Current Consensus
PICK's Technical Analysis Consensus is currently Strong Sell, with 6 buy, 2 neutral, and 37 sell votes. PICK's 14-day RSI is 38.88, which places the ETF in a weaker momentum range. PICK's beta is 1.17, indicating market sensitivity broadly in line with the market.
What Changed in PICK?
The largest recent change in PICK is Risk Resilience moving up by 3.0 points over the available 7-day comparison window. Risk Resilience remains the strongest visible factor.
What Would Change the PICK Outlook?
The current neutral outlook could improve if AIQ moves above 70, momentum recovers, risk resilience improves, and price confirms a stronger trend above the 50-day and 200-day moving averages. It would weaken if AIQ falls below 40, price loses long-term moving-average support, distribution or liquidity context deteriorates, or risk evidence worsens.
AIQ > 70, RSI above 55, price above SMA-50/SMA-200, and positive market-context evidence.
AIQ below 40, RSI below 45, loss of SMA-200, negative revisions, or rising volatility and drawdown risk.
PICK Decision Framework
Public evidence layers, setup checks, and risk context for iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF.
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF (PICK) ETF Analysis
iShares MSCI Global Metals & Mining Producers ETF has an AIQ Score of 52/100 in a Neutral regime. Risk is strongest at 67/100. Beta is 1.17, above market sensitivity. Review the supporting etf factors together before drawing a conclusion from any single score.
| Evidence Layer | Public Evidence |
|---|---|
| Regime Context | PICK is in a Neutral AIQ regime with score 52/100. |
| Signal Conflict | The primary conflict is that risk leads at 67/100 while momentum lags at 32/100. |
| Factor Evidence | Momentum 32/100 · Quality 62/100 · Risk 67/100 |
| Persistence | Current snapshot evidence is shown; historical persistence remains in AIQ Pro. |
Current Setup Checklist
Risk is the strongest factor at 67/100.
Momentum is 32/100 and RSI (14) is 38.9.
PICK is in a Neutral regime at 52/100.
Risk factor is 67/100 with beta 1.17 and annual volatility 31.41%.
Current conflict: risk leads at 67/100 while momentum lags at 32/100.
PICK Research Cluster
ETF-specific paths for performance, risk, distributions, market context, data, comparisons, and news.
PICK ETF Analytics
PICK holdings context, yield, risk, valuation exposure, momentum, and AIQ evidence.
PICK Technical Analysis
PICK technical setup based on RSI, MACD, moving averages, AIQ Momentum, volume, trend, volatility, and pivots.
PICK ETF Market Context
Track PICK market context, news pressure, trend changes, income events, and current allocation evidence.
PICK Distribution Analysis
PICK distribution yield, annualized distributions, payment history, and income context.
PICK ETF Data
PICK available fund data, market metrics, technical readings, risk measures, and AIQ evidence.
PICK Risk Analysis
PICK volatility, beta, drawdown, Sharpe ratio, VaR, and downside resilience.
PICK ETF News
PICK ETF news, market tone, recent headlines, and catalyst context.
PICK vs Commodities Peers
Current peer cohort: PICK · REMX · SGOL · SIL · SILJ. Compare AIQ, factor scores, Sharpe ratio and 1-year volatility in one indexable view.
| Peer | AIQ | Value | Momentum | Risk | Sharpe | 1Y Volatility | Compare |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PICK Current ETF | 52/100 | — | 32/100 | 67/100 | 0.72 | 31.41% | Current |
| REMX VanEck Rare Earth/Strategic Metals ETF | 43/100 | — | 24/100 | 43/100 | -0.51 | 46.66% | PICK vs REMX |
| SGOL Aberdeen Standard Physical Gold Shares ETF | 56/100 | — | 38/100 | 57/100 | -0.2 | 28.93% | PICK vs SGOL |
| SIL Global X Silver Miners ETF | 50/100 | — | 32/100 | 50/100 | 0.35 | 55.00% | PICK vs SIL |
| SILJ ETFMG Prime Junior Silver Miners ETF | 49/100 | — | 31/100 | 38/100 | 0.23 | 59.69% | PICK vs SILJ |
Peer cohort is resolved dynamically from the AlgovestIQ universe taxonomy and Compare relationship graph. Data as of Oct 21, 2026.
About the AIQ Score
Methodology for the current ETF evidence.
The AlgovestIQ AIQ Score combines multiple dimensions of ETF evidence, including momentum, valuation exposure, quality, risk resilience, sentiment context, and timing signals. It is a descriptive research score, not a guarantee of future performance or a personalized recommendation.
View AIQ methodologyFactor Diagnostics
A compact bridge from the AIQ score to the evidence tabs.
Valuation exposure across the fund's holdings.
Quality context inferred from fund exposure and available evidence.
Trend, momentum, volume, and timing confirmation.
Resilience, volatility, beta, drawdown, and tail risk.
News and event pressure around the setup.
Open the return calculator with ETF context while purchase price, shares, dates and fees remain user inputs.
AIQ Component Profile
Compare the five component scores on one consistent 0–100 scale.
Review earnings timing, revisions, news pressure, and prior event reactions in one place.
Open catalystsNo quarterly financial rows in this snapshot.
Checked Oct 22, 2026
Explore factor drivers, conflicts, persistence, and scenario sensitivity in the advanced workspace.
ETF Analytics Snapshot
Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.
ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.
Market Confirmation
Technicals are summarized first, with the indicator library behind it.
Risk Alignment
Higher resilience is stronger; exposure metrics stay separate.
Continue Researching PICK
Open the detailed evidence pages and workflows behind the stock overview read.
Premium Feature
Full AIQ Analysis
AIQ Intelligence
AIQ Pro for PICK
Scenario Analysis
AIQ Scenario Builder
Portfolio Implication
Related Links
PICK ETF FAQ
What is PICK ETF price today?
PICK is currently shown at $57.48. Use the live quote with the 52-week range and AIQ context before comparing funds.
What is PICK's 52-week high and low?
PICK's 52-week range is $44.06 to $69.02 based on the latest completed market-close snapshot from Oct 21, 2026. A price near either extreme should be evaluated with volatility and trend evidence.
Does PICK pay a dividend?
PICK's current distribution yield is 2.27% based on the latest completed market-close snapshot from Oct 21, 2026. For ETFs, dividend yield should be compared with expense ratio, holdings, and risk.
What should investors compare before buying PICK?
Compare PICK's price trend, expense profile, yield, holdings exposure, volatility, and AIQ signal. ETF decisions should focus on portfolio fit as much as current momentum.