Current etf page

ETF Analytics

PYLD ETF Holdings & Fundamentals

Fund Profile · Cost · Size · Liquidity · Exposure

Financial ServicesAsset Management - BondsScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

PYLDPIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund

Financial Services / Asset Management - Bonds

Low Priority

Above Peers

NeutralEdge 6/10
$25.46+$0.03 (+0.12%)

Latest quote

  • Momentum
    56
  • Value
    36
  • Quality
    66
  • Risk resilience
    88
  • Sentiment
    —
algovestiq.comScore data as of Oct 21, 2026

PYLD Holdings

2,122 holdings; the ten largest make up 21.60% of the fund. Holdings as of Sep 12, 2026.

Holdings
2,122
Top 10 weight
21.60%
Share of the fund in its ten largest positions
Largest holding
FNMA TBA 30 YR 5 SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE 5.00% 10/13/2056
4.10%
Expense ratio
0.74%
$74.00 a year per $10,000
Fund size
$15.9B
Top 25 holdings by weight
RankSymbolHoldingWeightMarket value
1NET OTHER ASSETS12.35%-$2.69B
2FNMA TBA 30 YR 5 SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE 5.00% 10/13/20564.10%$894.25M
3FNMA TBA 30 YR 6 SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE 6.00% 11/12/20564.01%$874.38M
4CITIGROUP REPO REPO 5807 3.63% 09/14/20263.85%$839.2M
5FNMA TBA 30 YR 4 SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE 4.00% 10/13/20563.06%$667.28M
6FNMA POOL MA6052 FN 05/56 FIXED 4.5 4.50% 05/01/20561.91%$416.32M
7REPO BANK AMERICA REPO 3.64% 09/14/20261.83%$400M
8US DOLLAR0.90%-$195.03M
9FNMA TBA 30 YR 4.5 SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE 4.50% 10/13/20560.80%$173.6M
10TSY INFL IX N/B 01/36 1.875 1.88% 01/15/20360.69%$150.25M
11FED HM LN PC POOL RQ0117 FR 05/56 FIXED 4.5 4.50% 05/01/20560.68%$148.55M
12FNMA TBA 30 YR 5.5 SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE 5.50% 10/13/20560.67%$144.97M
13REPUBLIC OF PERU SR UNSECURED 144A 08/32 6.15 6.15% 08/12/20320.58%$125.62M
14RD MICHIGAN PROP OWNER I SR SECURED 144A 03/45 7.5 7.50% 03/30/20450.53%$116.21M
15REPUBLIC OF SOUTH AFRICA BONDS 01/37 8.5 8.50% 01/31/20370.53%$114.64M
16LETRA TESOURO NACIONAL BILLS 04/27 0.00000 04/01/20270.47%$101.26M
17TSY INFL IX N/B 07/34 1.875 1.88% 07/15/20340.46%$100.63M
18TSY INFL IX N/B 04/29 2.125 2.13% 04/15/20290.46%$100.65M
19FNMA TBA 30 YR 6 SINGLE FAMILY MORTGAGE 6.00% 10/13/20560.45%$99M
20CASHMERE FUNDING TRUST CASHT 2026 1 A11 5.40% 02/13/20630.45%$99.02M
21US TREASURY N/B 11/45 4.625 4.63% 11/15/20450.44%$95.4M
22JANE STREET GRP/JSG FIN SR SECURED 144A 08/31 7.294 7.29% 08/13/20310.40%$86.41M
23JANE STREET GRP/JSG FIN SR SECURED 144A 08/33 7.686 7.69% 08/13/20330.39%$84.53M
24US TREASURY N/B 05/48 3.125 3.13% 05/15/20480.38%$82.52M
25FED HM LN PC POOL SL4832 FR 05/56 FIXED 4.5 4.50% 05/01/20560.38%$82.44M

PYLD Expense Ratio

PYLD charges 0.74% a year, about $74.00 for every $10,000 invested.

Yearly cost by amount invested
InvestedCost a year
$10,000$74.00
$25,000$185.00
$100,000$740.00

The fee is taken from the fund's assets rather than billed, so it shows up as slightly lower returns.

ETF Analytics Snapshot

Current ETF evidence uses fund profile, cost, size, distribution, momentum, and risk fields.

Price
$25.46
As of Oct 21, 2026
Fund size
$15.9B
Expense ratio
0.74%
Distribution yield
6.60%
PIMCO ETF evidence

ETF pages use fund-native profile fields for cost, size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, issuer, and launch date.

Review ETF analytics
Holdings
2,122
NAV
$25.38
Average volume
4.8M
Inception
Jun 21, 2023
Asset class
Fixed Income
Primary exposure
Energy (100.00%)
Beta
0.81
Momentum score
56/100

ETF Fundamentals Overview

Fund-native evidence replaces stock-only quarterly statement fields for ETF pages.

Fund profile

FieldValue
Fund namePIMCO Multisector Bond Active Exchange-Traded Fund
IssuerPIMCO
Asset classFixed Income
Primary exposureEnergy (100.00%)
DomicileUS
Inception dateJun 21, 2023
Websitehttps://www.pimco.com/us/en/investments/etf/pimco-multisector-bond-active-exchange-traded-fund/usetf-usd

Current ETF metrics

FieldValue
Fund size$15.9B
Expense ratio0.74%
Holdings count2,122
NAV$25.38
Average volume4.8M
Distribution yield6.60%
Beta0.81

ETF Exposure

Sector and country weights of the fund's holdings.

Sector exposure
FieldValue
Energy100.00%
Country exposure
FieldValue
Panama0.02%
Spain0.10%
Israel0.06%
Egypt0.10%
Ecuador0.12%
Austria0.05%
Mexico0.34%
Ireland0.77%

ETF Risk-Adjusted Context

Risk and return-efficiency metrics sit beside fund structure rather than company financial statements.

AIQ Score
58/100

Composite research read.

Sharpe Ratio
-2.32

Return per unit of total volatility.

Sortino Ratio
—

Return per unit of downside volatility.

Max Drawdown
-6.66%

Largest trailing drawdown in the risk window.

Momentum
56/100

Trend and price behavior.

Value Exposure
36/100

Relative valuation/exposure context.

Risk
88/100

Volatility and downside resilience.

Annual Volatility
4.03%

Annualized realized volatility.

ETF analytics context
How to read PYLD's ETF profile

Read cost, fund size, liquidity, holdings breadth, NAV, distribution yield, and exposure together. ETF analytics should not be judged by company-only fields such as revenue, EPS, margins, or payout ratio when those rows are not applicable.

Analysis tools

Export and portfolio tools complement the ETF evidence above.

Fundamentals export

Current evidence CSV · Pro workflow

Unlock with Pro
Portfolio context

Holding, weight, concentration · Personalized to holdings

Unlock with Premium
Continue to PYLD AIQ Pro
See how ETF evidence contributes to the full analysis workspace.

How to Read a Fundamental Profile

Fundamental analysis is the discipline of estimating what a business is worth by examining the financial evidence it produces: how much it earns, how efficiently it converts revenue to cash, how much capital it uses to produce those earnings, and whether the current price compensates an investor for the risks of holding it. The metrics on this page are organized into six evidence buckets -- valuation, profitability, leverage, growth, efficiency, and company size -- because each bucket answers a different question. Valuation multiples answer whether the market price is cheap or expensive relative to underlying earnings power. Profitability answers whether the business model is inherently strong or thin. Leverage answers whether the balance sheet is durable under stress. No single ratio tells a complete story; the analysis is about how the full set hangs together.

The single most diagnostic question in fundamental analysis is whether a business generates returns on invested capital above its cost of capital. A business that earns 20% ROIC while its cost of capital is 9% is compounding value for shareholders at an 11-point spread -- and the market will typically pay a meaningful premium to book value for that privilege. A business that earns 8% ROIC against a 10% cost of capital is destroying economic value even if reported earnings are growing, because growth at below-cost returns dilutes per-share value rather than building it. This is why ROIC and gross margin -- which measures the inherent advantage in the product before overhead -- are the highest-signal fundamental metrics for evaluating business quality at the model level.

Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA, P/S, P/FCF) measure what the market currently demands per unit of earnings, sales, or cash flow. They are not independently actionable: a low P/E can indicate value or distress, and a high P/E can indicate genuine quality or speculative excess. The interpretive work is contextual -- comparing a multiple to sector peers, to the company's own history, and to the underlying growth rate. The PEG ratio (P/E divided by earnings growth rate) is a simple first-order adjustment; EV/EBITDA is more reliable for cross-capital-structure comparisons because it normalizes for debt. FCF yield (FCF / market cap) is the cleanest single valuation signal for mature businesses because it is harder to manipulate than GAAP earnings.

Growth metrics deserve careful handling. Revenue growth that outpaces earnings growth signals margin compression -- revenue expansion without profitability improvement. EPS growth that outpaces revenue growth often reflects share buybacks rather than operational leverage, which is worth distinguishing. The highest-quality growth signature is expanding ROIC alongside revenue growth: the business is finding new markets without sacrificing the economics that made the existing business attractive. Declining ROIC with accelerating revenue growth is the opposite -- scale without economics, often the precursor to a valuation reset.

How to Read This Table

  • Valuation multiples (P/E, EV/EBITDA): Compare within sector and against the company's own 5-year history before concluding cheap or expensive.
  • ROIC vs WACC spread: The most important single quality signal. Sustained ROIC above cost of capital is the foundation of durable long-term returns.
  • Gross margin: Measures inherent product economics before overhead. Declining gross margin at scale is an early warning sign.
  • Debt-to-Equity and Interest Coverage: Frame balance sheet durability. Interest coverage below 3x reduces resilience in stress.
  • FCF yield: Divide trailing free cash flow by market cap. Yields above 4-5% are generally constructive; negative FCF yield requires a clear path to conversion.
  • Revenue growth vs. EPS growth: The gap between them tells you whether scale is creating or consuming margin.

These are analytical tools, not investment recommendations. Historical patterns do not guarantee future results.

PYLD ETF Analytics FAQ

What is PYLD's expense ratio?

PYLD's expense ratio shows the annual fund cost when available. Compare it with holdings, tracking exposure, liquidity, dividend yield, and volatility.

What is PYLD's dividend yield?

PYLD's dividend or distribution yield helps investors compare income potential. It should be weighed against fund strategy, expense ratio, and risk.

How diversified is PYLD?

PYLD's diversification depends on holdings count, top-position concentration, and sector exposure. Fund size and liquidity do not automatically mean broad diversification.

Is PYLD overvalued or undervalued?

ETF valuation depends on the valuation of its underlying holdings, sector exposure, and market regime. Use fund fundamentals with risk and technical context.