AAL vs INTC Stock Comparison
AAL currently leads INTC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 45 vs 30. The clearest difference is value.
What is the main difference between AAL and INTC?
AAL leads the current stock comparison as American Airlines Group Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
American Airlines Group Inc. vs Intel Corp.
AAL leads
AAL leads by 15 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality, and the lead has widened from 9 points over 30 sessions.
Stable: 5 of 6 evidence groups support AAL, and its lead is widening.
American Airlines Group Inc.
Intel Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors AAL over INTC, 45 versus 30 as of Oct 21, 2026. AAL's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality. AAL also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AAL today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability: analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. AAL lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 15 points over 30 sessions. AAL leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare American Airlines Group Inc. and Intel Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare AAL and INTC against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value62 vs 30AAL +32
- Quality48 vs 39AAL +9
- Momentum26 vs 21AAL +5
- Risk Resilience34 vs 29AAL +5
5 of 6 evidence groups favor AAL. AAL’s edge is concentrated in value and quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience -2, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 5 active signals are unchanged.
AAL's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AAL and INTC both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
AAL (American Airlines Group Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
INTC (Intel Corp.): the counter-case, on technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 46.6% against 38.3%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
AALAAL on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AALAAL on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
AALAAL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 32 points.
Momentum
AALAAL on the Momentum factor, by 5 points.
Lower downside
AALAAL on Risk Resilience, by 5 points.
Analyst upside
AALAAL on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | AAL | INTC | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +42.4% | +18.2% | AAL has more room |
| Target dispersion | +80.4% | +122.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 12 | 27 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AAL. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | AAL | 45 vs 30 |
| Fundamentals | AALon balance | revenue growth 20.3% vs 18.8%; EPS growth 119% vs -195.9%; TTM ROE 8.3% vs -10.8%; gross margin 21% vs 38.9%; operating margin 1.7% vs 0.1% — AAL takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | AAL | Value 62 vs 30 |
| Technicals | INTC | Price vs 50-day -7.8% vs -9.6%; vs 200-day -11.3% vs 7.8% |
| Risk Resilience | AAL | Risk Resilience 34 vs 29 |
| Analyst expectations | AAL | Target upside 42.4% vs 18.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AAL and INTC and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 15 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on AAL.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20AAL lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 15 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- AAL +15
- 45 vs 30
- 7 sessions ago
- AAL +15
- 45 vs 30
- 30 sessions ago
- AAL +9
- 52 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- AAL +5
- 47 vs 42
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 4 bearish / 2 neutral
Only AAL
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (2.88%)
- Beta Spike Warning — bearish, risk, long horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only INTC
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (20.88%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, MACD Bearish Crossover.
INTC is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.03%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.39%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1INTC closes the Value gap — currently 32 points behind, the largest single contributor to AAL's edge.
- 2INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3AAL starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
AAL leads on balance| Metric | AAL | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 20.3% | 18.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 119% | -195.9% |
| Gross margin | 21% | 38.9% |
| Operating margin | 1.7% | 0.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 8.3% | -10.8% |
| Debt to equity | -9 | 0.58 |
Performance
INTC leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | AAL | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -3.1% | -10.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -11% | -26% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -18.1% | -10.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 2.9% | 38.4% |
| Year to date | -21% | 148.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 1.9% | 148.9% |
Technicals
INTC has the stronger structure| Metric | AAL | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 31.7 | 16.4 |
| ADX (14) | 23.5 | 23.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | -7.8% | -9.6% |
| Price vs 200-day | -11.3% | 7.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 38.3% | 46.6% |
Risk
AAL is the more resilient| Metric | AAL | INTC |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.94 | 3.08 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.2 | 1.5 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.36 | 2.73 |
| Max drawdown | -37.4% | -41.9% |
| Current drawdown | -33.3% | -34.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 48.2% | 77.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.6% | -6.2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AAL or INTC?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, AAL is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 45 against INTC's 30. The edge comes from value and quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AAL or INTC the better buy right now?
AAL carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor AAL over INTC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. AAL leads Value by 32 points; AAL leads Quality by 9 points; AAL leads Momentum by 5 points. AAL leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by INTC simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, AAL or INTC?
Analyst price targets imply +42.4% upside for AAL and +18.2% for INTC, so the Street currently favors AAL. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AAL or INTC?
AAL is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. AAL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 32 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AAL or INTC?
AAL on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AAL or INTC?
AAL on the Momentum factor, by 5 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AAL or INTC?
AAL is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AAL on Risk Resilience, by 5 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AAL more profitable than INTC?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 21% vs 38.9%; operating margin 1.7% vs 0.1%; ttm roe 8.3% vs -10.8%. AAL leads on two measures and INTC on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is AAL's lead over INTC getting stronger or weaker?
AAL lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 15 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the AAL vs INTC verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: INTC closes the Value gap — currently 32 points behind, the largest single contributor to AAL's edge; INTC's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; AAL starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AAL and INTC?
AAL: 0 bullish / 4 bearish / 2 neutral. INTC: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AAL is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On INTC it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare AAL and INTC with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.