AAON vs PRIM Stock Comparison
Compare AAON and PRIM across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between AAON and PRIM?
AAON leads the current stock comparison as AAON, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
AAON, Inc. vs Primoris Services Corporation
AAON leads
AAON leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from PRIM. Wall Street currently favors PRIM on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support AAON, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
AAON, Inc.
Primoris Services Corporation
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors AAON over PRIM, 44 versus 42 as of Sep 11, 2026. AAON's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while PRIM holds the stronger value profile. AAON also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors PRIM. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AAON today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. AAON lead: Reversed — PRIM led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; AAON now leads by 2.
Compare AAON, Inc. and Primoris Services Corporation across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare AAON and PRIM against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value40 vs 64PRIM +24
- Quality52 vs 32AAON +20
- Risk Resilience49 vs 41AAON +8
- Momentum37 vs 30AAON +7
3 of 6 evidence groups favor AAON. AAON’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; PRIM keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
No factor moved materially.
New signals
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (2.1%)
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
AAON's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AAON and PRIM both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
AAON (AAON, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
PRIM (Primoris Services Corporation): the counter-case, on value, valuation, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
AAONAAON on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AAONAAON on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PRIMPRIM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 24 points.
Momentum
AAONAAON on the Momentum factor, by 7 points.
Lower downside
AAONAAON on Risk Resilience, by 8 points.
Analyst upside
PRIMPRIM on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors AAON, analyst targets favor PRIM. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | AAON | PRIM | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +47.9% | +90.5% | PRIM has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +78.1% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AAON. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 44 vs 42 |
| Fundamentals | AAON | revenue growth 26.2% vs 8.2%; EPS growth 40.8% vs -240.6%; TTM ROE 17.2% vs 8.5%; gross margin 25.6% vs 8.6%; operating margin 11.1% vs 3% |
| Valuation | PRIM | Value 40 vs 64 |
| Technicals | AAON | Price vs 50-day -14% vs -8.5%; vs 200-day -22.2% vs -40.7% |
| Risk Resilience | AAON | Risk Resilience 49 vs 41 |
| Analyst expectations | PRIM | Target upside 47.9% vs 90.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AAON and PRIM and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on AAON.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10AAON lead: Reversed — PRIM led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; AAON now leads by 2.
- Today
- AAON +2
- 44 vs 42
- 7 sessions ago
- AAON +1
- 42 vs 41
- 30 sessions ago
- PRIM +2
- 41 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- PRIM +4
- 38 vs 42
The lead changed hands 6 times in this window, most recently on Jul 1 when PRIM moved ahead of AAON.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (6.04%)
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (2.1%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (49.68%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.78%)
AAON leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +4.28%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +3.17%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1PRIM closes the Quality gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to AAON's edge.
- 2PRIM's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3AAON's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
AAON leads on balance| Metric | AAON | PRIM |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 26.2% | 8.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 40.8% | -240.6% |
| Gross margin | 25.6% | 8.6% |
| Operating margin | 11.1% | 3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 17.2% | 8.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.46 | 0.69 |
Performance
AAON leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | AAON | PRIM |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.5% | -1.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -10.2% | -10.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -36.8% | -22.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -16.4% | -45.4% |
| Year to date | 0.4% | -41.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -5.4% | -37.1% |
Technicals
AAON has the stronger structure| Metric | AAON | PRIM |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 39.9 | 35.1 |
| ADX (14) | 31.2 | 26.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -14% | -8.5% |
| Price vs 200-day | -22.2% | -40.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 43.4% | 36.7% |
Risk
AAON is the more resilient| Metric | AAON | PRIM |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.05 | 1.94 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.2 | -0.12 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.35 | -0.11 |
| Max drawdown | -49.7% | -64.5% |
| Current drawdown | -48.4% | -64% |
| Annualized volatility | 61.6% | 79.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.1% | -5.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AAON or PRIM?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, AAON is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 44 against PRIM's 42. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. PRIM is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AAON or PRIM the better buy right now?
AAON carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor AAON over PRIM?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PRIM leads Value by 24 points; AAON leads Quality by 20 points; AAON leads Risk Resilience by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AAON or PRIM?
Analyst price targets imply +47.9% upside for AAON and +90.5% for PRIM, so the Street currently favors PRIM. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors AAON. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AAON or PRIM?
PRIM is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PRIM on the peer-relative Value factor, by 24 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AAON or PRIM?
AAON on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AAON or PRIM?
AAON on the Momentum factor, by 7 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AAON or PRIM?
AAON is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AAON on Risk Resilience, by 8 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AAON more profitable than PRIM?
AAON leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 25.6% vs 8.6%; operating margin 11.1% vs 3%; ttm roe 17.2% vs 8.5%.
Is AAON's lead over PRIM getting stronger or weaker?
AAON lead: Reversed — PRIM led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; AAON now leads by 2. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 6 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-01, when PRIM moved ahead of AAON.
What would change the AAON vs PRIM verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: PRIM closes the Quality gap — currently 20 points behind, the largest single contributor to AAON's edge; PRIM's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; AAON's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AAON and PRIM?
AAON: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. PRIM: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AAON is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On PRIM it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare AAON and PRIM with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.