ACAD vs XNCR Stock Comparison
Compare ACAD and XNCR across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between ACAD and XNCR?
ACAD leads the current stock comparison as ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. vs Xencor, Inc.
ACAD leads
ACAD leads by 23 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value. Wall Street currently favors XNCR on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support ACAD, and its current signal state is conflicted.
ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Xencor, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors ACAD over XNCR, 68 versus 45 as of Sep 11, 2026. ACAD's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value. ACAD also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors XNCR. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ACAD today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. ACAD lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 23 points over 30 sessions.
Compare ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Xencor, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare ACAD and XNCR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality92 vs 48ACAD +44
- Value57 vs 34ACAD +23
- Risk Resilience69 vs 55ACAD +14
- Momentum50 vs 50Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor ACAD. ACAD’s edge is concentrated in quality and value.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +6
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum -1
New signals
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
ACAD's lead widened by 3 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ACAD and XNCR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
ACAD (ACADIA Pharmaceuticals Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
XNCR (Xencor, Inc.): the counter-case, on technicals, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 71.1% against 35.5%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
ACADACAD on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
XNCRXNCR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
ACADACAD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 23 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
ACADACAD on Risk Resilience, by 14 points.
Analyst upside
XNCRXNCR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors ACAD, analyst targets favor XNCR. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | ACAD | XNCR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +21.1% | +40.3% | XNCR has more room |
| Target dispersion | +102.3% | +75.9% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 4 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ACAD. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | ACAD | 68 vs 45 |
| Fundamentals | ACADon balance | revenue growth 14.9% vs 10.3%; EPS growth 8% vs 83%; TTM ROE 32.4% vs -28.7%; gross margin 91.1% vs 43.3%; operating margin 7.6% vs -205.8% — ACAD takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | ACAD | Value 57 vs 34 |
| Technicals | XNCR | Price vs 50-day 1.5% vs 12.9%; vs 200-day 13.1% vs 58.8% |
| Risk Resilience | ACAD | Risk Resilience 69 vs 55 |
| Analyst expectations | XNCR | Target upside 21.1% vs 40.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ACAD and XNCR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 23 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on ACAD.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10ACAD lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 23 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- ACAD +23
- 68 vs 45
- 7 sessions ago
- ACAD +19
- 69 vs 50
- 30 sessions ago
- ACAD +21
- 74 vs 53
- 90 sessions ago
- ACAD +21
- 74 vs 53
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (11.82%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (41.52%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
ACAD leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.32%, AIQ +2 points).
Price is up while the AIQ Score moved down 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price +0.62%, AIQ -1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1XNCR closes the Quality gap — currently 44 points behind, the largest single contributor to ACAD's edge.
- 2XNCR's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3ACAD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
ACAD leads on balance| Metric | ACAD | XNCR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 14.9% | 10.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 8% | 83% |
| Gross margin | 91.1% | 43.3% |
| Operating margin | 7.6% | -205.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 32.4% | -28.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0.06 | 0.13 |
Performance
XNCR leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | ACAD | XNCR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -4.1% | -9.8% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -5.8% | 4.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 30.5% | 105.1% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 26.3% | 101.5% |
| Year to date | 3.9% | 58.5% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 9.3% | 188.5% |
Technicals
XNCR has the stronger structure| Metric | ACAD | XNCR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 37.9 | 38.5 |
| ADX (14) | 25.9 | 52 |
| Price vs 50-day | 1.5% | 12.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | 13.1% | 58.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 35.5% | 71.1% |
Risk
ACAD is the more resilient| Metric | ACAD | XNCR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.84 | 1.24 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.38 | 1.88 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.61 | 3.32 |
| Max drawdown | -27.6% | -42.6% |
| Current drawdown | -9.3% | -17.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 38% | 67.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.5% | -5.7% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ACAD or XNCR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, ACAD is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 68 against XNCR's 45. The edge comes from quality and value. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ACAD or XNCR the better buy right now?
ACAD carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor ACAD over XNCR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. ACAD leads Quality by 44 points; ACAD leads Value by 23 points; ACAD leads Risk Resilience by 14 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ACAD or XNCR?
Analyst price targets imply +21.1% upside for ACAD and +40.3% for XNCR, so the Street currently favors XNCR. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors ACAD. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ACAD or XNCR?
ACAD is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. ACAD on the peer-relative Value factor, by 23 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ACAD or XNCR?
XNCR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ACAD or XNCR?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ACAD or XNCR?
ACAD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. ACAD on Risk Resilience, by 14 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ACAD more profitable than XNCR?
ACAD leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 91.1% vs 43.3%; operating margin 7.6% vs -205.8%; ttm roe 32.4% vs -28.7%.
Is ACAD's lead over XNCR getting stronger or weaker?
ACAD lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 23 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the ACAD vs XNCR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: XNCR closes the Quality gap — currently 44 points behind, the largest single contributor to ACAD's edge; XNCR's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; ACAD's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about ACAD and XNCR?
ACAD: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. XNCR: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on ACAD is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On XNCR it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare ACAD and XNCR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.