AEE vs AEP Stock Comparison
Compare AEE and AEP across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between AEE and AEP?
AEP leads the current stock comparison as American Electric Power Company, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Ameren Corporation vs American Electric Power Company, Inc.
AEP leads
AEP leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum, having only recently taken the lead back from AEE. Wall Street currently favors AEE on target upside.
Fragile: 1 of 6 evidence groups support AEP, the lead recently changed hands, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Ameren Corporation
American Electric Power Company, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors AEP over AEE, 43 versus 39 as of Sep 11, 2026. AEP's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum. AEP also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors AEE. 1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AEP today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. AEP lead: Reversed — AEE led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; AEP now leads by 4.
Compare Ameren Corporation and American Electric Power Company, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare AEE and AEP against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum25 vs 36AEP +11
- Value47 vs 49Even
- Risk Resilience54 vs 52Even
- Quality36 vs 37Even
1 of 6 evidence groups favor AEP. AEP’s edge is concentrated in momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
New signals
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
No new signals fired.
AEP's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AEE and AEP both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
AEP (American Electric Power Company, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum.
AEE (Ameren Corporation): the counter-case, on fundamentals, analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
AEPAEP on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AEEAEE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
AEPAEP on the Momentum factor, by 11 points.
Lower downside
AEEAEE carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
AEEAEE on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors AEP, analyst targets favor AEE. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | AEE | AEP | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +14.5% | +12.1% | AEE has more room |
| Target dispersion | +17.5% | +13% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 7 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AEP. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | AEP | 39 vs 43 |
| Fundamentals | AEEon balance | revenue growth -3.9% vs -9.6%; EPS growth -11.6% vs -19.3%; TTM ROE 11.7% vs 10%; gross margin 41.1% vs 49%; operating margin 24.9% vs 28.4% — AEE takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 47 vs 49 |
| Technicals | Even | Price vs 50-day -4.3% vs -4%; vs 200-day -1.8% vs -2.7% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 54 vs 52 |
| Analyst expectations | AEE | Target upside 14.5% vs 12.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AEE and AEP and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on AEP.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10AEP lead: Reversed — AEE led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; AEP now leads by 4.
- Today
- AEP +4
- 39 vs 43
- 7 sessions ago
- AEP +2
- 40 vs 42
- 30 sessions ago
- AEE +2
- 45 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- AEP +3
- 50 vs 53
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Jun 17 when AEP moved ahead of AEE.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (1.65%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (1.22%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
AEE is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.05%, AIQ -1 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.11%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AEE closes the Momentum gap — currently 11 points behind, the largest single contributor to AEP's edge.
- 2AEE's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3AEP's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
AEE leads on balance| Metric | AEE | AEP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -3.9% | -9.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -11.6% | -19.3% |
| Gross margin | 41.1% | 49% |
| Operating margin | 24.9% | 28.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 11.7% | 10% |
| Debt to equity | 1.59 | 1.66 |
Performance
AEP leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | AEE | AEP |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.9% | -0.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -3.6% | -0.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -3.5% | -3.9% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -4% | -5.9% |
| Year to date | 5.1% | 7.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 5% | 14.8% |
Technicals
Split| Metric | AEE | AEP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 30 | 41.9 |
| ADX (14) | 14.2 | 15.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | -4.3% | -4% |
| Price vs 200-day | -1.8% | -2.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 12.2% | 16.4% |
Risk
Split| Metric | AEE | AEP |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | -0.11 | -0.05 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.19 | 0.58 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.29 | 0.89 |
| Max drawdown | -11.3% | -12.8% |
| Current drawdown | -11.3% | -11% |
| Annualized volatility | 17.2% | 19.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.8% | -1.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AEE or AEP?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, AEP is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 43 against AEE's 39. The edge comes from momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AEE or AEP the better buy right now?
AEP carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor AEP over AEE?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. AEP leads Momentum by 11 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AEE or AEP?
Analyst price targets imply +14.5% upside for AEE and +12.1% for AEP, so the Street currently favors AEE. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors AEP. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AEE or AEP?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AEE or AEP?
AEE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AEE or AEP?
AEP on the Momentum factor, by 11 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AEE or AEP?
AEE is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AEE carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AEE more profitable than AEP?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 41.1% vs 49%; operating margin 24.9% vs 28.4%; ttm roe 11.7% vs 10%. AEE leads on one measure and AEP on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is AEP's lead over AEE getting stronger or weaker?
AEP lead: Reversed — AEE led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; AEP now leads by 4. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-06-17, when AEP moved ahead of AEE.
What would change the AEE vs AEP verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AEE closes the Momentum gap — currently 11 points behind, the largest single contributor to AEP's edge; AEE's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; AEP's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AEE and AEP?
AEE: 2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. AEP: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AEE is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On AEP it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare AEE and AEP with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.