AHH vs BNL Stock Comparison
BNL currently leads AHH in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 43 vs 36. The clearest difference is quality, while AHH has the stronger value profile.
What is the main difference between AHH and BNL?
BNL leads the current stock comparison as Broadstone Net Lease, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
AH Realty Trust, Inc. vs Broadstone Net Lease, Inc.
BNL leads
BNL leads by 7 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support BNL, and its current signal state is conflicted.
AH Realty Trust, Inc.
Broadstone Net Lease, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BNL over AHH, 43 versus 36 as of Oct 21, 2026. BNL's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience, while AHH holds the stronger value profile. BNL also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BNL today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader is throwing conflicting signals. BNL lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions.
Compare AH Realty Trust, Inc. and Broadstone Net Lease, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare AHH and BNL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality13 vs 40BNL +27
- Risk Resilience55 vs 74BNL +19
- Value49 vs 40AHH +9
4 of 6 evidence groups favor BNL. BNL’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience; AHH keeps a meaningful value edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session.
Largest factor move: Momentum +5
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
BNL's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AHH and BNL both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
BNL (Broadstone Net Lease, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
AHH (AH Realty Trust, Inc.): the counter-case, on value, valuation, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 40.5% against 18.3%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
BNLBNL on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AHHAHH on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
AHHAHH on the peer-relative Value factor, by 9 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
BNLBNL on Risk Resilience, by 19 points.
Analyst upside
BNLBNL on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | AHH | BNL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +33.1% | +36.4% | BNL has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +21.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | AHH | BNL |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 4.94% | 24.68% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $0.440 | $0.385 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $0.560 | $1.160 |
| Years increased | 4 | 5 |
| No cut in window | No (1) | Yes |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | not ranked |
BNL grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 24.68% a year against AHH's 4.94%. BNL never reduced its regular dividend in the window; AHH did in 1 year.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BNL. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | BNL | 36 vs 43 |
| Fundamentals | BNLon balance | revenue growth 0.4% vs 0.7%; EPS growth 100% vs -12.5%; TTM ROE -8.3% vs 5%; gross margin 28% vs 43.2%; operating margin 39.5% vs 48.9% — BNL takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | AHH | Value 49 vs 40 |
| Technicals | AHH | Price vs 50-day 0.4% vs -12.8%; vs 200-day -8.8% vs -10.6% |
| Risk Resilience | BNL | Risk Resilience 55 vs 74 |
| Analyst expectations | BNL | Target upside 33.1% vs 36.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AHH and BNL and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 7 points.
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BNL.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20BNL lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- BNL +7
- 36 vs 43
- 7 sessions ago
- BNL +7
- 36 vs 43
- 30 sessions ago
- BNL +6
- 36 vs 42
- 90 sessions ago
- BNL +7
- 33 vs 40
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
No active signals
No signal that the other name lacks.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only BNL
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (0.72%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
BNL leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -2.98%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AHH closes the Quality gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to BNL's edge.
- 2AHH generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3BNL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
BNL leads on balance| Metric | AHH | BNL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0.4% | 0.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 100% | -12.5% |
| Gross margin | 28% | 43.2% |
| Operating margin | 39.5% | 48.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -8.3% | 5% |
| Debt to equity | 2.03 | 0.95 |
Performance
BNL leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | AHH | BNL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.3% | -3.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -9.6% | -7.1% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -2.5% | -20.7% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -11.8% | -11.1% |
| Year to date | -5.6% | 2.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -30.9% | -4.3% |
Technicals
AHH has the stronger structure| Metric | AHH | BNL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 24.3 | 36.2 |
| ADX (14) | 30.8 | 50.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.4% | -12.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | -8.8% | -10.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 40.5% | 18.3% |
Risk
BNL is the more resilient| Metric | AHH | BNL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.29 | 0.03 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.29 | -0.34 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.75 | -0.5 |
| Max drawdown | -21.4% | -22.7% |
| Current drawdown | -17.3% | -22.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 28.7% | 19.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3% | -2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AHH or BNL?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, BNL is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 43 against AHH's 36. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. AHH is not without a case — it holds the better value profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AHH or BNL the better buy right now?
BNL carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor BNL over AHH?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. BNL leads Quality by 27 points; BNL leads Risk Resilience by 19 points; AHH leads Value by 9 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AHH or BNL?
Analyst price targets imply +33.1% upside for AHH and +36.4% for BNL, so the Street currently favors BNL. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AHH or BNL?
AHH is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. AHH on the peer-relative Value factor, by 9 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AHH or BNL?
AHH on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AHH or BNL?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AHH or BNL?
BNL is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BNL on Risk Resilience, by 19 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AHH more profitable than BNL?
BNL leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 28% vs 43.2%; operating margin 39.5% vs 48.9%; ttm roe -8.3% vs 5%.
Is BNL's lead over AHH getting stronger or weaker?
BNL lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 7 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the AHH vs BNL verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AHH closes the Quality gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to BNL's edge; AHH generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; BNL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AHH and BNL?
AHH: No active signals. BNL: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. On BNL it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare AHH and BNL with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.