AHH vs SLG Stock Comparison
AH Realty Trust, Inc. vs SL Green Realty Corp.
SLG leads
SLG leads by 13 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value, but the lead has narrowed from 17 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors AHH on target upside.
Competitive: 4 of 6 evidence groups support SLG, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
AH Realty Trust, Inc.
SL Green Realty Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SLG over AHH, 49 versus 36 as of Sep 5, 2026. SLG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value, while AHH holds the stronger risk resilience profile. SLG also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors AHH. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SLG today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. SLG lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 13 points over 30 sessions.
Compare AH Realty Trust, Inc. and SL Green Realty Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare AHH and SLG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality30%13 vs 30SLG +17
- Value30%49 vs 63SLG +14
- Risk Resilience15%55 vs 48AHH +7
4 of 6 evidence groups favor SLG. SLG’s edge is concentrated in quality and value; AHH keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-03, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-02.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +3
No new signals fired.
SLG's lead widened by 1 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AHH and SLG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SLG (SL Green Realty Corp.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
AHH (AH Realty Trust, Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 40.5% against 29.7%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SLGSLG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
AHHAHH on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
SLGSLG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 14 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
AHHAHH on Risk Resilience, by 7 points.
Analyst upside
AHHAHH on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors SLG, analyst targets favor AHH. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | AHH | SLG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +33.1% | +1.2% | AHH has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +58.7% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SLG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | SLG | 36 vs 49 |
| Fundamentals | SLGon balance | EPS growth 100% vs 68.3%; TTM ROE -8.3% vs -4.6%; gross margin 28% vs 51.1%; operating margin 39.5% vs 40.9% — SLG takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | SLG | Value 49 vs 63 |
| Technicals | SLG | Price vs 50-day 0.4% vs 3.1%; vs 200-day -8.8% vs 19.5% |
| Risk Resilience | AHH | Risk Resilience 55 vs 48 |
| Analyst expectations | AHH | Target upside 33.1% vs 1.2% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AHH and SLG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 13 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SLG.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 22 – Sep 3SLG lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 13 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- SLG +13
- 36 vs 49
- 7 sessions ago
- SLG +18
- 33 vs 51
- 30 sessions ago
- SLG +17
- 33 vs 50
- 90 sessions ago
- SLG +15
- 33 vs 48
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
No active signals
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (17.33%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
SLG leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.18%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AHH closes the Quality gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to SLG's edge.
- 2AHH generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3SLG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 13-point move would eliminate SLG's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SLG leads on balance| Metric | AHH | SLG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0.4% | 4.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 100% | 68.3% |
| Gross margin | 28% | 51.1% |
| Operating margin | 39.5% | 40.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -8.3% | -4.6% |
| Debt to equity | 2.03 | 1.51 |
Technicals
SLG has the stronger structure| Metric | AHH | SLG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 24.3 | 44.7 |
| ADX (14) | 30.8 | 33 |
| Price vs 50-day | 0.4% | 3.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -8.8% | 19.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 40.5% | 29.7% |
Risk
AHH is the more resilient| Metric | AHH | SLG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.45 | 0.92 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.64 | -0.09 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.88 | -0.15 |
| Max drawdown | -21.4% | -46.2% |
| Current drawdown | -17.3% | -16.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 27.5% | 38% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.8% | -3.6% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AHH or SLG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SLG is the stronger of the two as of Sep 5, 2026, scoring 49 against AHH's 36. The edge comes from quality and value. AHH is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AHH or SLG the better buy right now?
SLG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 5, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SLG over AHH?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. SLG leads Quality by 17 points; SLG leads Value by 14 points; AHH leads Risk Resilience by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AHH or SLG?
Analyst price targets imply +33.1% upside for AHH and +1.2% for SLG, so the Street currently favors AHH. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors SLG. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AHH or SLG?
SLG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. SLG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 14 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AHH or SLG?
AHH on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AHH or SLG?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AHH or SLG?
AHH is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AHH on Risk Resilience, by 7 points. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AHH more profitable than SLG?
SLG leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 28% vs 51.1%; operating margin 39.5% vs 40.9%; ttm roe -8.3% vs -4.6%.
Is SLG's lead over AHH getting stronger or weaker?
SLG lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 17 to 13 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-22 and 2026-09-03. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the AHH vs SLG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AHH closes the Quality gap — currently 17 points behind, the largest single contributor to SLG's edge; AHH generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; SLG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 3 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 13-point move would eliminate SLG's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about AHH and SLG?
AHH: No active signals. SLG: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. On SLG it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare AHH and SLG with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.