AI vs SDGR Stock Comparison
SDGR currently leads AI in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 56 vs 53. The clearest difference is quality.
What is the main difference between AI and SDGR?
SDGR leads the current stock comparison as Schrödinger, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
C3.ai, Inc. vs Schrödinger, Inc.
SDGR leads
SDGR leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Quality, having only recently taken the lead back from AI. Wall Street currently favors AI on target upside.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support SDGR, the lead recently changed hands, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
C3.ai, Inc.
Schrödinger, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SDGR over AI, 56 versus 53 as of Oct 31, 2026. SDGR's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality. SDGR also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors AI. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SDGR today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. SDGR lead: Reversed — AI led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SDGR now leads by 3.
Compare C3.ai, Inc. and Schrödinger, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare AI and SDGR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality44 vs 51SDGR +7
- Momentum71 vs 73Even
- Value51 vs 52Even
- Risk Resilience43 vs 43Even
2 of 6 evidence groups favor SDGR. SDGR’s edge is concentrated in quality.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-28, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-27.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +2, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 6 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +14
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
The lead changed hands: SDGR moved ahead of AI in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AI and SDGR both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SDGR (Schrödinger, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality.
AI (C3.ai, Inc.): the counter-case, on analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SDGRSDGR on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
SDGRSDGR on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
AIAI carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
AIAI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors SDGR, analyst targets favor AI. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | AI | SDGR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -10.5% | -30% | AI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +84.9% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Sell | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 4 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SDGR. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 53 vs 56 |
| Fundamentals | SDGR | EPS growth 16.8% vs 109.9%; TTM ROE -63.9% vs -16.4%; gross margin 30.9% vs 56.9%; operating margin -194.9% vs -59.2% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 51 vs 52 |
| Technicals | SDGR | Price vs 50-day 7.8% vs 10.3%; vs 200-day 22.6% vs 85.4% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 43 vs 43 |
| Analyst expectations | AI | Target upside -10.5% vs -30% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AI and SDGR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SDGR.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 29 – Oct 28SDGR lead: Reversed — AI led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SDGR now leads by 3.
- Today
- SDGR +3
- 53 vs 56
- 7 sessions ago
- AI +9
- 54 vs 45
- 30 sessions ago
- AI +2
- 53 vs 51
- 90 sessions ago
- SDGR +8
- 48 vs 56
The lead changed hands 4 times in this window, most recently on Oct 28 when SDGR moved ahead of AI.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
4 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral
Only AI
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
5 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only SDGR
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 5 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish, Uptrend Structure Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -2.63%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 4 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -9.5%, AIQ +4 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AI closes the Quality gap — currently 7 points behind, the largest single contributor to SDGR's edge.
- 2AI's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend.
- 3SDGR's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
SDGR leads on balance| Metric | AI | SDGR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -3.1% | 0.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 16.8% | 109.9% |
| Gross margin | 30.9% | 56.9% |
| Operating margin | -194.9% | -59.2% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -63.9% | -16.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.01 | 0.33 |
Performance
SDGR leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | AI | SDGR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 4.6% | 29.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 12.2% | -0.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 35.9% | 98.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 39.2% | 162.5% |
| Year to date | -8.5% | 71.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -30.9% | 37.1% |
Technicals
SDGR has the stronger structure| Metric | AI | SDGR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 61.2 | 62.9 |
| ADX (14) | 34.5 | 25.9 |
| Price vs 50-day | 7.8% | 10.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | 22.6% | 85.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 43.1% | 103.6% |
Risk
Split| Metric | AI | SDGR |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.09 | 1.68 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.42 | 0.79 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.61 | 1.42 |
| Max drawdown | -57.1% | -49.1% |
| Current drawdown | -31.9% | -5.3% |
| Annualized volatility | 59% | 65.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.6% | -5.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AI or SDGR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SDGR is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 56 against AI's 53. The edge comes from quality. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AI or SDGR the better buy right now?
SDGR carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SDGR over AI?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SDGR leads Quality by 7 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AI or SDGR?
Analyst price targets imply -10.5% upside for AI and -30% for SDGR, so the Street currently favors AI. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors SDGR. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AI or SDGR?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AI or SDGR?
SDGR on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AI or SDGR?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AI or SDGR?
AI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AI carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AI more profitable than SDGR?
SDGR leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 30.9% vs 56.9%; operating margin -194.9% vs -59.2%; ttm roe -63.9% vs -16.4%.
Is SDGR's lead over AI getting stronger or weaker?
SDGR lead: Reversed — AI led by 2 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SDGR now leads by 3. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-29 and 2026-10-28. The lead has changed hands 4 times in that window, most recently on 2026-10-28, when SDGR moved ahead of AI.
What would change the AI vs SDGR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AI closes the Quality gap — currently 7 points behind, the largest single contributor to SDGR's edge; AI's Bollinger Band Squeeze turns directional — it is neutral today and would confirm a change in trend; SDGR's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AI and SDGR?
AI: 4 bullish / 0 bearish / 2 neutral. SDGR: 5 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on AI is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On SDGR it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare AI and SDGR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.