AIV vs SUI Stock Comparison
SUI currently leads AIV in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 57 vs 55. The clearest difference is momentum, while AIV has the stronger quality profile.
What is the main difference between AIV and SUI?
SUI leads the current stock comparison as Sun Communities, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Apartment Investment and Management Company vs Sun Communities, Inc.
SUI leads
SUI leads by 2 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience, having only recently taken the lead back from AIV. Wall Street currently favors AIV on target upside.
Fragile: 2 of 6 evidence groups support SUI, the lead recently changed hands, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Apartment Investment and Management Company
Sun Communities, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors SUI over AIV, 57 versus 55 as of Oct 21, 2026. SUI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience, while AIV holds the stronger quality profile. SUI also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors AIV. 2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SUI today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. SUI lead: Reversed — AIV led by 11 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SUI now leads by 2.
Compare Apartment Investment and Management Company and Sun Communities, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare AIV and SUI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum25 vs 75SUI +50
- Quality80 vs 43AIV +37
- Risk Resilience38 vs 74SUI +36
- Value63 vs 47AIV +16
2 of 6 evidence groups favor SUI. SUI’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience; AIV keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 7 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
New signals
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
SUI's lead widened by 1 AIQ point in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AIV and SUI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
SUI (Sun Communities, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
AIV (Apartment Investment and Management Company): the counter-case, on quality, value, valuation — but at materially higher volatility, 35% against 17.6%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
SUISUI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AIVAIV on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
AIVAIV on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points.
Momentum
SUISUI on the Momentum factor, by 50 points.
Lower downside
SUISUI on Risk Resilience, by 36 points.
Analyst upside
AIVAIV on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors SUI, analyst targets favor AIV. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | AIV | SUI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +521.1% | +19.7% | AIV has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +24.4% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 11 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 6 covered evidence groups favor SUI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 55 vs 57 |
| Fundamentals | Even | EPS growth -40% vs -112.5%; TTM ROE 105% vs -13.1%; gross margin 51.2% vs 54%; operating margin -84.2% vs 25.1% |
| Valuation | AIV | Value 63 vs 47 |
| Technicals | SUI | Price vs 50-day -28.1% vs -0.4%; vs 200-day -54.8% vs -3.5% |
| Risk Resilience | SUI | Risk Resilience 38 vs 74 |
| Analyst expectations | AIV | Target upside 521.1% vs 19.7% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AIV and SUI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on SUI.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20SUI lead: Reversed — AIV led by 11 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SUI now leads by 2.
- Today
- SUI +2
- 55 vs 57
- 7 sessions ago
- AIV +3
- 55 vs 52
- 30 sessions ago
- AIV +11
- 56 vs 45
- 90 sessions ago
- AIV +17
- 61 vs 44
The lead changed hands once in this window, most recently on Oct 19 when SUI moved ahead of AIV.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
Only AIV
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.50%)
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
2 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted
Only SUI
- BB Upper Band Breach — bearish, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: Death Cross Active.
SUI leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -3.59%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 1 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -2.49%, AIQ +1 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AIV closes the Momentum gap — currently 50 points behind, the largest single contributor to SUI's edge.
- 2AIV's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3SUI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | AIV | SUI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 0% | -3.2% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -40% | -112.5% |
| Gross margin | 51.2% | 54% |
| Operating margin | -84.2% | 25.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 105% | -13.1% |
| Debt to equity | 0.86 | 0.73 |
Performance
SUI leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | AIV | SUI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -3.5% | 5.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -22.7% | 5% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -36.3% | -0.2% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -59.9% | -7.6% |
| Year to date | -71.7% | -3.6% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -69.9% | -3.4% |
Technicals
SUI has the stronger structure| Metric | AIV | SUI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 18.4 | 75.7 |
| ADX (14) | 72.5 | 25.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -28.1% | -0.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | -54.8% | -3.5% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 35% | 17.6% |
Risk
SUI is the more resilient| Metric | AIV | SUI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.3 | -0.02 |
| Sharpe ratio | -2.65 | -0.28 |
| Sortino ratio | -2.36 | -0.49 |
| Max drawdown | -72.5% | -19.8% |
| Current drawdown | -72.2% | -12.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 42.7% | 19.8% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3% | -2% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AIV or SUI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, SUI is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 57 against AIV's 55. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. AIV is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AIV or SUI the better buy right now?
SUI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 2 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 2 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor SUI over AIV?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. SUI leads Momentum by 50 points; AIV leads Quality by 37 points; SUI leads Risk Resilience by 36 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AIV or SUI?
Analyst price targets imply +521.1% upside for AIV and +19.7% for SUI, so the Street currently favors AIV. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors SUI. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AIV or SUI?
AIV is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. AIV on the peer-relative Value factor, by 16 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AIV or SUI?
AIV on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AIV or SUI?
SUI on the Momentum factor, by 50 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AIV or SUI?
SUI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. SUI on Risk Resilience, by 36 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AIV more profitable than SUI?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 51.2% vs 54%; operating margin -84.2% vs 25.1%; ttm roe 105% vs -13.1%. AIV leads on one measure and SUI on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is SUI's lead over AIV getting stronger or weaker?
SUI lead: Reversed — AIV led by 11 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; SUI now leads by 2. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands once in that window, most recently on 2026-10-19, when SUI moved ahead of AIV.
What would change the AIV vs SUI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AIV closes the Momentum gap — currently 50 points behind, the largest single contributor to SUI's edge; AIV's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; SUI's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AIV and SUI?
AIV: 1 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. SUI: 2 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AIV is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On SUI it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare AIV and SUI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.