ALGM vs AOSL Stock Comparison
Compare ALGM and AOSL across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between ALGM and AOSL?
AOSL leads the current stock comparison as Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. vs Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited
AOSL leads
AOSL leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Value, but the lead has narrowed from 11 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support AOSL, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.
Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors AOSL over ALGM, 44 versus 36 as of Sep 6, 2026. AOSL's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value, while ALGM holds the stronger quality profile. AOSL also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AOSL today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. AOSL lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Allegro MicroSystems, Inc. and Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare ALGM and AOSL against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value30%33 vs 65AOSL +32
- Quality30%48 vs 40ALGM +8
- Risk Resilience15%37 vs 39Even
- Momentum25%25 vs 25Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor AOSL. AOSL’s edge is concentrated in value; ALGM keeps a meaningful quality edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-05, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-04.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
AOSL's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ALGM and AOSL both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
AOSL (Alpha and Omega Semiconductor Limited): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value.
ALGM (Allegro MicroSystems, Inc.): the counter-case, on quality, fundamentals, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
AOSLAOSL on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value at 30% each.
Growth
ALGMALGM on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
AOSLAOSL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 32 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
ALGMALGM carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
AOSLAOSL on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | ALGM | AOSL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +52.6% | +78% | AOSL has more room |
| Target dispersion | +34% | +49% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 6 | 4 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor AOSL. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | AOSL | 36 vs 44 |
| Fundamentals | ALGM | revenue growth 6.6% vs 4%; EPS growth 201.1% vs 6.5%; TTM ROE 1.5% vs 0%; gross margin 47.2% vs 22.3%; operating margin 6.2% vs -6.4% |
| Valuation | AOSL | Value 33 vs 65 |
| Technicals | ALGM | Price vs 50-day -19.6% vs -21.8%; vs 200-day -7.1% vs -14.6% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 37 vs 39 |
| Analyst expectations | AOSL | Target upside 52.6% vs 78% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ALGM and AOSL and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on AOSL.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 24 – Sep 5AOSL lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 8 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- AOSL +8
- 36 vs 44
- 7 sessions ago
- AOSL +8
- 35 vs 43
- 30 sessions ago
- AOSL +11
- 39 vs 50
- 90 sessions ago
- AOSL +1
- 46 vs 47
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (15.51%)
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- Beta Spike Warning — bearish, risk, long horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (9.27%)
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- Beta Spike Warning — bearish, risk, long horizon
AOSL leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +2.95%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +3.07%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ALGM closes the Value gap — currently 32 points behind, the largest single contributor to AOSL's edge.
- 2ALGM's Beta Spike Warning resolves — a bearish risk rule currently active against it.
- 3AOSL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 8-point move would eliminate AOSL's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
ALGM leads on balance| Metric | ALGM | AOSL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 6.6% | 4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 201.1% | 6.5% |
| Gross margin | 47.2% | 22.3% |
| Operating margin | 6.2% | -6.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 1.5% | 0% |
| Debt to equity | 0.3 | 0.04 |
Performance
ALGM leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | ALGM | AOSL |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.3% | 2.3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -16.4% | -30.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -21.1% | -40% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 14.7% | 26.9% |
| Year to date | 38.8% | 27.2% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 22.7% | -9.3% |
Technicals
ALGM has the stronger structure| Metric | ALGM | AOSL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 26 | 23.9 |
| ADX (14) | 27.5 | 32.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | -19.6% | -21.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | -7.1% | -14.6% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 55.8% | 75.2% |
Risk
Split| Metric | ALGM | AOSL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.9 | 3.44 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.57 | 0.29 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.9 | 0.38 |
| Max drawdown | -49% | -55.7% |
| Current drawdown | -47.4% | -52.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 66.2% | 88.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.2% | -8.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ALGM or AOSL?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, AOSL is the stronger of the two as of Sep 6, 2026, scoring 44 against ALGM's 36. The edge comes from value. ALGM is not without a case — it holds the better quality profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ALGM or AOSL the better buy right now?
AOSL carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 6, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor AOSL over ALGM?
The composite weights Quality at 30%, Value at 30%, Momentum at 25% and Risk Resilience at 15%. AOSL leads Value by 32 points; ALGM leads Quality by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ALGM or AOSL?
Analyst price targets imply +52.6% upside for ALGM and +78% for AOSL, so the Street currently favors AOSL. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ALGM or AOSL?
AOSL is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. AOSL on the peer-relative Value factor, by 32 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ALGM or AOSL?
ALGM on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ALGM or AOSL?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ALGM or AOSL?
ALGM is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. ALGM carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ALGM more profitable than AOSL?
ALGM leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 47.2% vs 22.3%; operating margin 6.2% vs -6.4%; ttm roe 1.5% vs 0%.
Is AOSL's lead over ALGM getting stronger or weaker?
AOSL lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 8 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-04-24 and 2026-09-05. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the ALGM vs AOSL verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ALGM closes the Value gap — currently 32 points behind, the largest single contributor to AOSL's edge; ALGM's Beta Spike Warning resolves — a bearish risk rule currently active against it; AOSL's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 2 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 3 points over 30 sessions, and a further 8-point move would eliminate AOSL's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about ALGM and AOSL?
ALGM: 3 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. AOSL: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on ALGM is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On AOSL it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare ALGM and AOSL with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.