ALLE vs AME Stock Comparison
Compare ALLE and AME across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between ALLE and AME?
ALLE leads the current stock comparison as Allegion plc, with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Allegion plc vs AMETEK, Inc.
ALLE leads
ALLE leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Value and Quality. Wall Street currently favors AME on target upside.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support ALLE, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Allegion plc
AMETEK, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors ALLE over AME, 55 versus 49 as of Sep 11, 2026. ALLE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value and quality, while AME holds the stronger momentum profile. ALLE also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors AME. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ALLE today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. ALLE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Allegion plc and AMETEK, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare ALLE and AME against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Value60 vs 39ALLE +21
- Momentum27 vs 39AME +12
- Quality68 vs 58ALLE +10
- Risk Resilience67 vs 71AME +4
3 of 6 evidence groups favor ALLE. ALLE’s edge is concentrated in value and quality; AME keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Momentum +2
No new signals fired.
ALLE's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ALLE and AME both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
ALLE (Allegion plc): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value and quality.
AME (AMETEK, Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, risk resilience, technicals.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
ALLEALLE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
ALLEALLE on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
ALLEALLE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 21 points.
Momentum
AMEAME on the Momentum factor, by 12 points.
Lower downside
AMEAME on Risk Resilience, by 4 points.
Analyst upside
AMEAME on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors ALLE, analyst targets favor AME. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | ALLE | AME | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +3.7% | +13% | AME has more room |
| Target dispersion | +17.6% | +31.5% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 10 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ALLE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | ALLE | 55 vs 49 |
| Fundamentals | ALLEon balance | revenue growth 11.4% vs 6%; EPS growth 34.4% vs 2.3%; TTM ROE 32% vs 14.5%; gross margin 44.8% vs 36.6%; operating margin 20.8% vs 26.1% — ALLE takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | ALLE | Value 60 vs 39 |
| Technicals | AME | Price vs 50-day -0.1% vs 0.3%; vs 200-day 0.2% vs 3.3% |
| Risk Resilience | AME | Risk Resilience 67 vs 71 |
| Analyst expectations | AME | Target upside 3.7% vs 13% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ALLE and AME and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on ALLE.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10ALLE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- ALLE +6
- 55 vs 49
- 7 sessions ago
- ALLE +14
- 60 vs 46
- 30 sessions ago
- ALLE +8
- 62 vs 54
- 90 sessions ago
- ALLE +10
- 64 vs 54
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Jun 23 when ALLE moved ahead of AME.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (1.67%)
- RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce — bullish, momentum, short horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (6.40%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
ALLE leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.38%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +3.26%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AME closes the Value gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to ALLE's edge.
- 2AME's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3ALLE's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
ALLE leads on balance| Metric | ALLE | AME |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 11.4% | 6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 34.4% | 2.3% |
| Gross margin | 44.8% | 36.6% |
| Operating margin | 20.8% | 26.1% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 32% | 14.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.96 | 0.21 |
Performance
AME leads 4 of 6 windows| Metric | ALLE | AME |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.5% | 0.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -8.9% | -9.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 16.9% | 5.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 3.2% | 4.4% |
| Year to date | -5% | 14.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -12.1% | 24.2% |
Technicals
AME has the stronger structure| Metric | ALLE | AME |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 27.2 | 42.2 |
| ADX (14) | 22.5 | 18.5 |
| Price vs 50-day | -0.1% | 0.3% |
| Price vs 200-day | 0.2% | 3.3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 20% | 19.8% |
Risk
AME is the more resilient| Metric | ALLE | AME |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.55 | 0.93 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.43 | 0.91 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.6 | 1.62 |
| Max drawdown | -30.1% | -13.7% |
| Current drawdown | -15.8% | -9.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 27.4% | 23.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -2.3% | -2.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ALLE or AME?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, ALLE is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 55 against AME's 49. The edge comes from value and quality. AME is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ALLE or AME the better buy right now?
ALLE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor ALLE over AME?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. ALLE leads Value by 21 points; AME leads Momentum by 12 points; ALLE leads Quality by 10 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ALLE or AME?
Analyst price targets imply +3.7% upside for ALLE and +13% for AME, so the Street currently favors AME. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors ALLE. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ALLE or AME?
ALLE is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. ALLE on the peer-relative Value factor, by 21 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ALLE or AME?
ALLE on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ALLE or AME?
AME on the Momentum factor, by 12 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ALLE or AME?
AME is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AME on Risk Resilience, by 4 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ALLE more profitable than AME?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 44.8% vs 36.6%; operating margin 20.8% vs 26.1%; ttm roe 32% vs 14.5%. ALLE leads on two measures and AME on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is ALLE's lead over AME getting stronger or weaker?
ALLE lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-06-23, when ALLE moved ahead of AME.
What would change the ALLE vs AME verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AME closes the Value gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to ALLE's edge; AME's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; ALLE's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about ALLE and AME?
ALLE: 2 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. AME: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on ALLE is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On AME it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare ALLE and AME with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.