AMD vs MRVL Stock Comparison
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. vs Marvell Technology, Inc.
AMD and MRVL are effectively level
AMD and MRVL are effectively level on the AIQ Score; the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.
Marvell Technology, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score does not currently separate AMD and MRVL as of Sep 2, 2026. Both names are scored on the same 0–100 scale across Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience, and the factor table below shows where each one holds its advantage.
Compare Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. and Marvell Technology, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience15%39 vs 36Even
- Quality30%63 vs 65Even
- Momentum25%47 vs 46Even
- Value30%24 vs 24Even
Neither name separates cleanly on the covered dimensions.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-01, compared against the prior scored session 2026-08-31.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AMD and MRVL both carry a full feed there.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
EvenNeither separates on the overall score.
Growth
AMDAMD on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
AMDAMD carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
AMDAMD on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | AMD | MRVL | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +21.6% | +17.2% | AMD has more room |
| Target dispersion | +177.7% | +116% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 27 | 27 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
How each independent group of evidence reads the pair.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 44 vs 44 |
| Fundamentals | AMDon balance | revenue growth 12.5% vs 9%; EPS growth 64.7% vs -91.7%; ROE 10.1% vs 16.8%; gross margin 53.2% vs 50.6%; operating margin 15.7% vs 16.2% — AMD takes 3 of 4 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 24 vs 24 |
| Technicals | MRVL | Price vs 50-day -9.2% vs -9.1%; vs 200-day 39.8% vs 41.8% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 39 vs 36 |
| Analyst expectations | AMD | Target upside 21.6% vs 17.2% |
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 0 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Apr 20 – Sep 1MRVL lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 9 to 0 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- Level
- 44 vs 44
- 7 sessions ago
- MRVL +8
- 44 vs 52
- 30 sessions ago
- MRVL +9
- 39 vs 48
- 90 sessions ago
- AMD +2
- 46 vs 44
The lead changed hands 2 times in this window, most recently on Jun 1 when MRVL moved ahead of AMD.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (49.90%)
- Beta Spike Warning — bearish, risk, long horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (5.13%)
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (51.80%)
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (8.13%)
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.29%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -2.09%, AIQ 0 points).
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
AMD leads on balance| Metric | AMD | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 12.5% | 9% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 64.7% | -91.7% |
| Gross margin | 53.2% | 50.6% |
| Operating margin | 15.7% | 16.2% |
| Return on equity | 10.1% | 16.8% |
| Debt to equity | 0.06 | 0.29 |
Technicals
MRVL has the stronger structure| Metric | AMD | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 48.8 | 49.8 |
| ADX (14) | 9.2 | 16.7 |
| Price vs 50-day | -9.2% | -9.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 39.8% | 41.8% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 56% | 91% |
Risk
Split| Metric | AMD | MRVL |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.17 | 3.08 |
| Sharpe ratio | 1.73 | 1.6 |
| Sortino ratio | 3.02 | 2.54 |
| Max drawdown | -27.8% | -48.4% |
| Current drawdown | -19% | -33.1% |
| Annualized volatility | 71.8% | 81% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -5.9% | -7.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which has more analyst upside, AMD or MRVL?
Analyst price targets imply +21.6% upside for AMD and +17.2% for MRVL, so the Street currently favors AMD. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AMD or MRVL?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AMD or MRVL?
AMD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AMD or MRVL?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum carries 25% of the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AMD or MRVL?
AMD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. AMD carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. The Risk Resilience factor weights 15% of the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AMD more profitable than MRVL?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 53.2% vs 50.6%; operating margin 15.7% vs 16.2%; roe 10.1% vs 16.8%. Each name leads on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
What do the current signals say about AMD and MRVL?
AMD: 1 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. MRVL: 2 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AMD is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On MRVL it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare AMD and MRVL with others
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality (30%), Value (30%), Momentum (25%) and Risk (15%). Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.