AMRC vs DBRG Stock Comparison
DBRG currently leads AMRC in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 67 vs 31. The clearest difference is quality.
What is the main difference between AMRC and DBRG?
DBRG leads the current stock comparison as DigitalBridge Group, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Ameresco, Inc. vs DigitalBridge Group, Inc.
DBRG leads
DBRG leads by 36 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Risk Resilience. Wall Street currently favors AMRC on target upside.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support DBRG.
Ameresco, Inc.
DigitalBridge Group, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors DBRG over AMRC, 67 versus 31 as of Oct 22, 2026. DBRG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and risk resilience. DBRG also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors AMRC. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DBRG today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. DBRG lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 36 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Ameresco, Inc. and DigitalBridge Group, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare AMRC and DBRG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality17 vs 74DBRG +57
- Risk Resilience25 vs 81DBRG +56
- Value50 vs 52Even
4 of 6 evidence groups favor DBRG. DBRG’s edge is concentrated in quality and risk resilience.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Momentum +1, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
New signals
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session.
DBRG's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — AMRC and DBRG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
DBRG (DigitalBridge Group, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and risk resilience.
AMRC (Ameresco, Inc.): the counter-case, on analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 49.3% against 2.8%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
DBRGDBRG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AMRCAMRC on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
DBRGDBRG on Risk Resilience, by 56 points.
Analyst upside
AMRCAMRC on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors DBRG, analyst targets favor AMRC. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | AMRC | DBRG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +125.6% | +0.6% | AMRC has more room |
| Target dispersion | +58.1% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 3 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor DBRG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | DBRG | 31 vs 67 |
| Fundamentals | DBRGon balance | revenue growth 28.4% vs 3.3%; EPS growth 151.4% vs 18.3%; TTM ROE 2.5% vs 16%; gross margin 16.1% vs 95.7%; operating margin 7% vs 54.4% — DBRG takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 50 vs 52 |
| Technicals | DBRG | Price vs 50-day -12.2% vs 0%; vs 200-day -30.4% vs 3% |
| Risk Resilience | DBRG | Risk Resilience 25 vs 81 |
| Analyst expectations | AMRC | Target upside 125.6% vs 0.6% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AMRC and DBRG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 36 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on DBRG.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20DBRG lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 36 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- DBRG +36
- 31 vs 67
- 7 sessions ago
- DBRG +35
- 32 vs 67
- 30 sessions ago
- DBRG +37
- 32 vs 69
- 90 sessions ago
- DBRG +27
- 42 vs 69
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 4 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only AMRC
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (19.25%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (6.41%)
- BB Lower Band Breach — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- Beta Spike Warning — bearish, risk, long horizon
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
No active signals
No signal that the other name lacks.
AMRC is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +5.81%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AMRC closes the Quality gap — currently 57 points behind, the largest single contributor to DBRG's edge.
- 2AMRC's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3DBRG starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
DBRG leads on balance| Metric | AMRC | DBRG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 28.4% | 3.3% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 151.4% | 18.3% |
| Gross margin | 16.1% | 95.7% |
| Operating margin | 7% | 54.4% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 2.5% | 16% |
| Debt to equity | 1.5 | 0.14 |
Performance
DBRG leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | AMRC | DBRG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -10.2% | 0.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -22.6% | 0.6% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -19.8% | 1.4% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -29.9% | 3.9% |
| Year to date | -33.4% | 4.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -56% | 35% |
Technicals
DBRG has the stronger structure| Metric | AMRC | DBRG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 35.4 | 63.3 |
| ADX (14) | 21.1 | 19.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | -12.2% | 0% |
| Price vs 200-day | -30.4% | 3% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 49.3% | 2.8% |
Risk
DBRG is the more resilient| Metric | AMRC | DBRG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 3.04 | 0.42 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.83 | 0.72 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.35 | 1.65 |
| Max drawdown | -56.4% | -33.7% |
| Current drawdown | -55.9% | 0% |
| Annualized volatility | 68.5% | 54.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.5% | -2.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AMRC or DBRG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, DBRG is the stronger of the two as of Oct 22, 2026, scoring 67 against AMRC's 31. The edge comes from quality and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AMRC or DBRG the better buy right now?
DBRG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 22, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor DBRG over AMRC?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. DBRG leads Quality by 57 points; DBRG leads Risk Resilience by 56 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AMRC or DBRG?
Analyst price targets imply +125.6% upside for AMRC and +0.6% for DBRG, so the Street currently favors AMRC. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors DBRG. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AMRC or DBRG?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AMRC or DBRG?
AMRC on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AMRC or DBRG?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AMRC or DBRG?
DBRG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. DBRG on Risk Resilience, by 56 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AMRC more profitable than DBRG?
DBRG leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 16.1% vs 95.7%; operating margin 7% vs 54.4%; ttm roe 2.5% vs 16%.
Is DBRG's lead over AMRC getting stronger or weaker?
DBRG lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 36 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the AMRC vs DBRG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AMRC closes the Quality gap — currently 57 points behind, the largest single contributor to DBRG's edge; AMRC's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; DBRG starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about AMRC and DBRG?
AMRC: 1 bullish / 4 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. DBRG: No active signals. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on AMRC is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare AMRC and DBRG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.