AMRZ vs BGCP Stock Comparison
Compare AMRZ and BGCP across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between AMRZ and BGCP?
BGCP leads the current stock comparison as BGC Partners, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from risk resilience and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Amrize Ltd vs BGC Partners, Inc.
BGCP leads
BGCP leads by 14 AIQ points, primarily on Risk Resilience.
Competitive: 2 of 4 evidence groups support BGCP.
Amrize Ltd
BGC Partners, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BGCP over AMRZ, 46 versus 32 as of Sep 11, 2026. BGCP's advantage is driven primarily by stronger risk resilience. 2 of 4 covered evidence groups favor BGCP today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: only 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree.
Compare Amrize Ltd and BGC Partners, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Compare AMRZ and BGCP against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience26 vs 41BGCP +15
- Value41 vs 39Even
2 of 4 evidence groups favor BGCP. BGCP’s edge is concentrated in risk resilience.
The central trade-off
BGCP (BGC Partners, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by risk resilience.
AMRZ (Amrize Ltd): the counter-case, on fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
BGCPBGCP on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
AMRZAMRZ on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
BGCPBGCP on Risk Resilience, by 15 points.
Analyst upside
EvenAnalyst targets are level or not covered for both names.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | AMRZ | BGCP | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +41.1% | — | Level |
| Target dispersion | +52.5% | — | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
2 of 4 covered evidence groups favor BGCP. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | BGCP | 32 vs 46 |
| Fundamentals | AMRZ | revenue growth 60.4% vs -11.5% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 41 vs 39 |
| Technicals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Risk Resilience | BGCP | Risk Resilience 26 vs 41 |
| Analyst expectations | Not covered | Not covered |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of AMRZ and BGCP and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 14 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- Only 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BGCP.
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1AMRZ closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 15 points behind, the largest single contributor to BGCP's edge.
- 2AMRZ generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3BGCP starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
AMRZ leads on balance| Metric | AMRZ | BGCP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 60.4% | -11.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 5.1% | 0% |
| Gross margin | — | 80% |
| Operating margin | — | 11.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | — | 19.2% |
| Debt to equity | — | 1.6 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | AMRZ | BGCP |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -5.9% | — |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -12.8% | — |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -19.9% | — |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -30.5% | — |
| Year to date | -20.8% | — |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -25% | — |
Technicals
Split| Metric | AMRZ | BGCP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 30 | — |
| ADX (14) | 29.6 | — |
| Price vs 50-day | -15% | — |
| Price vs 200-day | -23.3% | — |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 28.3% | — |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, AMRZ or BGCP?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, BGCP is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 46 against AMRZ's 32. The edge comes from risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is AMRZ or BGCP the better buy right now?
BGCP carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 2 of 4 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor BGCP over AMRZ?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. BGCP leads Risk Resilience by 15 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, AMRZ or BGCP?
Analyst price targets imply +41.1% upside for AMRZ and not covered for BGCP. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, AMRZ or BGCP?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, AMRZ or BGCP?
AMRZ on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, AMRZ or BGCP?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, AMRZ or BGCP?
BGCP is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BGCP on Risk Resilience, by 15 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is AMRZ more profitable than BGCP?
Margin data is not comparable for both names in the current snapshot.
What would change the AMRZ vs BGCP verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: AMRZ closes the Risk Resilience gap — currently 15 points behind, the largest single contributor to BGCP's edge; AMRZ generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; BGCP starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
Compare AMRZ and BGCP with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.