APD vs PPG Stock Comparison
PPG currently leads APD in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 64 vs 51. The clearest difference is quality, while APD has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between APD and PPG?
PPG leads the current stock comparison as PPG Industries, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. vs PPG Industries, Inc.
PPG leads
PPG leads by 13 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value, but the lead has narrowed from 21 points over 30 sessions.
Competitive: 5 of 6 evidence groups support PPG, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
PPG Industries, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors PPG over APD, 64 versus 51 as of Oct 24, 2026. PPG's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value, while APD holds the stronger momentum profile. PPG also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PPG today, and the comparison is rated Competitive on stability: the leader's advantage has been narrowing. PPG lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 21 to 13 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Air Products and Chemicals, Inc. and PPG Industries, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare APD and PPG against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality25 vs 54PPG +29
- Value40 vs 66PPG +26
- Momentum89 vs 71APD +18
- Risk Resilience61 vs 67PPG +6
5 of 6 evidence groups favor PPG. PPG’s edge is concentrated in quality and value; APD keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-23, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-22.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 7 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum -11
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
PPG's lead narrowed by 3 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — APD and PPG both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
PPG (PPG Industries, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
APD (Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.): the counter-case, on momentum, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
PPGPPG on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
PPGPPG on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
PPGPPG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 26 points.
Momentum
APDAPD on the Momentum factor, by 18 points.
Lower downside
PPGPPG on Risk Resilience, by 6 points.
Analyst upside
PPGPPG on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | APD | PPG | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +10.2% | +18.3% | PPG has more room |
| Target dispersion | +20.1% | +18.3% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 11 | 8 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | APD | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 5.90% | 5.77% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $5.360 | $2.100 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $7.140 | $2.780 |
| Years increased | 4 | 5 |
| No cut in window | No (1) | Yes |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | #220 |
APD grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 5.90% a year against PPG's 5.77%. PPG never reduced its regular dividend in the window; APD did in 1 year.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor PPG. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | PPG | 51 vs 64 |
| Fundamentals | PPG | EPS growth -3% vs 14.6%; gross margin 32.1% vs 40.1%; operating margin -4.7% vs 12.5% |
| Valuation | PPG | Value 40 vs 66 |
| Technicals | APD | Price vs 50-day 4.6% vs 2%; vs 200-day 6.3% vs -1.4% |
| Risk Resilience | PPG | Risk Resilience 61 vs 67 |
| Analyst expectations | PPG | Target upside 10.2% vs 18.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of APD and PPG and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 13 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on PPG.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 24 – Oct 23PPG lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 21 to 13 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- PPG +13
- 51 vs 64
- 7 sessions ago
- PPG +7
- 50 vs 57
- 30 sessions ago
- PPG +21
- 36 vs 57
- 90 sessions ago
- PPG +17
- 44 vs 61
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
6 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only APD
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (1.61%)
- Keltner Channel Breakout — bullish, volatility, short horizon
- RSI Overbought — bearish, momentum, short horizon
- EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish — bullish, trend, medium horizon
- 52-Week High Proximity — bullish, risk, long horizon (1.5%)
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted
Only PPG
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (3.45%)
Both carry 1 more signal that do not separate them: MACD Bullish Crossover.
PPG leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.35%, AIQ 0 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -2.19%, AIQ -3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1APD closes the Quality gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to PPG's edge.
- 2APD's RSI Overbought resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3PPG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 8 points over 30 sessions, and a further 13-point move would eliminate PPG's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
PPG leads on balance| Metric | APD | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | -0.3% | 14.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -3% | 14.6% |
| Gross margin | 32.1% | 40.1% |
| Operating margin | -4.7% | 12.5% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -0.3% | 19.5% |
| Debt to equity | 1.31 | 0.88 |
Performance
APD leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | APD | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 2.5% | 3% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 9% | 2.9% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 5% | -6.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 1.8% | 0.7% |
| Year to date | 24.3% | 8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 20.6% | 6% |
Technicals
APD has the stronger structure| Metric | APD | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 87 | 65.2 |
| ADX (14) | 25.5 | 20.1 |
| Price vs 50-day | 4.6% | 2% |
| Price vs 200-day | 6.3% | -1.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 16.2% | 20.8% |
Risk
PPG is the more resilient| Metric | APD | PPG |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.07 | 1.05 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.72 | 0.28 |
| Sortino ratio | 1.13 | 0.44 |
| Max drawdown | -13% | -26.1% |
| Current drawdown | -2.2% | -15.9% |
| Annualized volatility | 26.4% | 30.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -1.9% | -3.1% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, APD or PPG?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, PPG is the stronger of the two as of Oct 24, 2026, scoring 64 against APD's 51. The edge comes from quality and value. APD is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is APD or PPG the better buy right now?
PPG carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 24, 2026, and the comparison is rated Competitive — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Competitive rating means the two are close enough that your objective, not the score, should decide.
Why does the AIQ Score favor PPG over APD?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. PPG leads Quality by 29 points; PPG leads Value by 26 points; APD leads Momentum by 18 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, APD or PPG?
Analyst price targets imply +10.2% upside for APD and +18.3% for PPG, so the Street currently favors PPG. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, APD or PPG?
PPG is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. PPG on the peer-relative Value factor, by 26 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, APD or PPG?
PPG on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, APD or PPG?
APD on the Momentum factor, by 18 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, APD or PPG?
PPG is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. PPG on Risk Resilience, by 6 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is APD more profitable than PPG?
PPG leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 32.1% vs 40.1%; operating margin -4.7% vs 12.5%; ttm roe -0.3% vs 19.5%.
Is PPG's lead over APD getting stronger or weaker?
PPG lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 21 to 13 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-24 and 2026-10-23. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the APD vs PPG verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: APD closes the Quality gap — currently 29 points behind, the largest single contributor to PPG's edge; APD's RSI Overbought resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; PPG's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 8 points over 30 sessions, and a further 13-point move would eliminate PPG's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about APD and PPG?
APD: 6 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. PPG: 1 bullish / 1 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on APD is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On PPG it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare APD and PPG with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.