API vs COUR Stock Comparison
API currently leads COUR in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 62 vs 46. The clearest difference is momentum.
What is the main difference between API and COUR?
API leads the current stock comparison as Agora, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Agora, Inc. vs Coursera, Inc.
API leads
API leads by 16 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum and Risk Resilience. Wall Street currently favors COUR on target upside.
Stable: 5 of 6 evidence groups support API.
Agora, Inc.
Coursera, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors API over COUR, 62 versus 46 as of Oct 31, 2026. API's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum and risk resilience. API also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors COUR. 5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor API today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability.
Compare Agora, Inc. and Coursera, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare API and COUR against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum77 vs 26API +51
- Risk Resilience64 vs 53API +11
- Value53 vs 49API +4
- Quality58 vs 55Even
5 of 6 evidence groups favor API. API’s edge is concentrated in momentum and risk resilience.
The central trade-off
API (Agora, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum and risk resilience.
COUR (Coursera, Inc.): the counter-case, on analyst expectations.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
APIAPI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
APIAPI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
APIAPI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
APIAPI on the Momentum factor, by 51 points.
Lower downside
APIAPI on Risk Resilience, by 11 points.
Analyst upside
COURCOUR on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors API, analyst targets favor COUR. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | API | COUR | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | -40.1% | +80.1% | COUR has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 2 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
5 of 6 covered evidence groups favor API. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | API | 62 vs 46 |
| Fundamentals | APIon balance | revenue growth 6.9% vs 52.6%; EPS growth 103.1% vs -216.7%; TTM ROE 2% vs -17.7%; gross margin 64.5% vs 55.9%; operating margin -4.3% vs -17.8% — API takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | API | Value 53 vs 49 |
| Technicals | API | Price vs 50-day 4.1% vs -35.1%; vs 200-day 7.4% vs -17.7% |
| Risk Resilience | API | Risk Resilience 64 vs 53 |
| Analyst expectations | COUR | Target upside -40.1% vs 80.1% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of API and COUR and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 16 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- 5 of 6 covered evidence groups point the same way. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on API.
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1COUR closes the Momentum gap — currently 51 points behind, the largest single contributor to API's edge.
- 2COUR generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover.
- 3API starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
API leads on balance| Metric | API | COUR |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 6.9% | 52.6% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 103.1% | -216.7% |
| Gross margin | 64.5% | 55.9% |
| Operating margin | -4.3% | -17.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 2% | -17.7% |
| Debt to equity | 0.18 | 0.01 |
Performance
API leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | API | COUR |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.7% | -5.4% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | 6.7% | -5.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 12.1% | -10.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 27.1% | -23.1% |
| Year to date | 9.6% | -36.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 23.9% | -48.9% |
Technicals
API has the stronger structure| Metric | API | COUR |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 67.8 | 31.6 |
| ADX (14) | 24.5 | 15.3 |
| Price vs 50-day | 4.1% | -35.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | 7.4% | -17.7% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 39.3% | 39.5% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, API or COUR?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, API is the stronger of the two as of Oct 31, 2026, scoring 62 against COUR's 46. The edge comes from momentum and risk resilience. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is API or COUR the better buy right now?
API carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 31, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 5 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor API over COUR?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. API leads Momentum by 51 points; API leads Risk Resilience by 11 points; API leads Value by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, API or COUR?
Analyst price targets imply -40.1% upside for API and +80.1% for COUR, so the Street currently favors COUR. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors API. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, API or COUR?
API is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. API on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, API or COUR?
API on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, API or COUR?
API on the Momentum factor, by 51 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, API or COUR?
API is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. API on Risk Resilience, by 11 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is API more profitable than COUR?
API leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 64.5% vs 55.9%; operating margin -4.3% vs -17.8%; ttm roe 2% vs -17.7%.
What would change the API vs COUR verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: COUR closes the Momentum gap — currently 51 points behind, the largest single contributor to API's edge; COUR generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as Golden Cross Active or MACD Bullish Crossover; API starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
Compare API and COUR with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.