APLD vs BTBT Stock Comparison
BTBT currently leads APLD in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 30 vs 24. The clearest difference is quality, while APLD has the stronger risk resilience profile.
What is the main difference between APLD and BTBT?
BTBT leads the current stock comparison as Bit Digital, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Applied Digital Corp. vs Bit Digital, Inc.
BTBT leads
BTBT leads by 6 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Value, but the lead has narrowed from 10 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support BTBT, its lead is narrowing, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Applied Digital Corp.
Bit Digital, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors BTBT over APLD, 30 versus 24 as of Oct 21, 2026. BTBT's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and value, while APLD holds the stronger risk resilience profile. BTBT also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BTBT today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. BTBT lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Applied Digital Corp. and Bit Digital, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price return from daily closes; distributions are not included.
Price return comparison
Growth of $10,000, price only
Split-adjusted closes only. Distributions are excluded, which understates the return of any fund or stock that pays them.
Compare APLD and BTBT against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality10 vs 28BTBT +18
- Risk Resilience30 vs 25APLD +5
- Value36 vs 40BTBT +4
- Momentum23 vs 25Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor BTBT. BTBT’s edge is concentrated in quality and value; APLD keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 7 active signals are unchanged.
No factor moved materially.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 9 active signals are unchanged.
BTBT's lead was unchanged in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — APLD and BTBT both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
BTBT (Bit Digital, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and value.
APLD (Applied Digital Corp.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, fundamentals, technicals — but at materially higher volatility, 72.3% against 55.4%.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
BTBTBTBT on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
APLDAPLD on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
BTBTBTBT on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
APLDAPLD on Risk Resilience, by 5 points.
Analyst upside
BTBTBTBT on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | APLD | BTBT | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +180.3% | +271.5% | BTBT has more room |
| Target dispersion | +115.6% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor BTBT. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | BTBT | 24 vs 30 |
| Fundamentals | APLDon balance | revenue growth 104.3% vs 15%; EPS growth -8.3% vs 31.1%; TTM ROE -16.7% vs -46.7%; gross margin 22.4% vs 32.1%; operating margin -33.7% vs -60.9% — APLD takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | BTBT | Value 36 vs 40 |
| Technicals | APLD | Price vs 50-day -18.6% vs -36.8%; vs 200-day -39.4% vs -45.9% |
| Risk Resilience | APLD | Risk Resilience 30 vs 25 |
| Analyst expectations | BTBT | Target upside 180.3% vs 271.5% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of APLD and BTBT and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 6 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on BTBT.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20BTBT lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 6 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- BTBT +6
- 24 vs 30
- 7 sessions ago
- BTBT +7
- 24 vs 31
- 30 sessions ago
- BTBT +10
- 28 vs 38
- 90 sessions ago
- BTBT +11
- 32 vs 43
The lead has not changed hands in this window.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
No signal that the other name lacks.
1 bullish / 6 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
Only BTBT
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.0%)
Both carry 7 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode, Keltner Channel Breakdown, RSI Oversold - Potential Bounce, Beta Spike Warning, Downtrend Structure Active, MACD Bearish Crossover.
BTBT leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +8.54%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +4.67%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1APLD closes the Quality gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to BTBT's edge.
- 2APLD's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3BTBT's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 6 bearish rules at once.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate BTBT's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
APLD leads on balance| Metric | APLD | BTBT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 104.3% | 15% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -8.3% | 31.1% |
| Gross margin | 22.4% | 32.1% |
| Operating margin | -33.7% | -60.9% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -16.7% | -46.7% |
| Debt to equity | 2.86 | 1.09 |
Performance
APLD leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | APLD | BTBT |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -13.9% | -25.6% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -32.3% | -44.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -35.7% | -42.3% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -38.3% | -41.9% |
| Year to date | -17.1% | -43.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -47.2% | -75.6% |
Technicals
APLD has the stronger structure| Metric | APLD | BTBT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 28.1 | 2 |
| ADX (14) | 26 | 27.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -18.6% | -36.8% |
| Price vs 200-day | -39.4% | -45.9% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 72.3% | 55.4% |
Risk
APLD is the more resilient| Metric | APLD | BTBT |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 4.43 | 3.63 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.1 | -1.16 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.18 | -2.06 |
| Max drawdown | -63.6% | -78.7% |
| Current drawdown | -61.1% | -78.7% |
| Annualized volatility | 102.3% | 90.1% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -9.4% | -8.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, APLD or BTBT?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, BTBT is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 30 against APLD's 24. The edge comes from quality and value. APLD is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is APLD or BTBT the better buy right now?
BTBT carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor BTBT over APLD?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. BTBT leads Quality by 18 points; APLD leads Risk Resilience by 5 points; BTBT leads Value by 4 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, APLD or BTBT?
Analyst price targets imply +180.3% upside for APLD and +271.5% for BTBT, so the Street currently favors BTBT. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, APLD or BTBT?
BTBT is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. BTBT on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, APLD or BTBT?
APLD on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, APLD or BTBT?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, APLD or BTBT?
APLD is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. APLD on Risk Resilience, by 5 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is APLD more profitable than BTBT?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 22.4% vs 32.1%; operating margin -33.7% vs -60.9%; ttm roe -16.7% vs -46.7%. APLD leads on two measures and BTBT on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is BTBT's lead over APLD getting stronger or weaker?
BTBT lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 10 to 6 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has not changed hands in that window.
What would change the APLD vs BTBT verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: APLD closes the Quality gap — currently 18 points behind, the largest single contributor to BTBT's edge; APLD's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; BTBT's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 6 bearish rules at once; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 4 points over 30 sessions, and a further 6-point move would eliminate BTBT's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about APLD and BTBT?
APLD: 1 bullish / 5 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. BTBT: 1 bullish / 6 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on APLD is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On BTBT it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare APLD and BTBT with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.