APO vs TROW Stock Comparison
TROW currently leads APO in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 63 vs 51. The clearest difference is quality.
What is the main difference between APO and TROW?
TROW leads the current stock comparison as T. Rowe Price Group, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Apollo Global Management, Inc. vs T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
TROW leads
TROW leads by 12 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum. Wall Street currently favors APO on target upside.
Stable: 4 of 6 evidence groups support TROW, and its signal state is cleanly positive.
Apollo Global Management, Inc.
T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TROW over APO, 63 versus 51 as of Oct 24, 2026. TROW's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum. TROW also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors APO. 4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TROW today, and the comparison is rated Stable on stability. TROW lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 12 points over 30 sessions. TROW leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so a sweep is not explained by valuation alone — it deserves additional scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, expectations or event risk.
Compare Apollo Global Management, Inc. and T. Rowe Price Group, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare APO and TROW against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality59 vs 80TROW +21
- Momentum37 vs 50TROW +13
- Risk Resilience66 vs 71TROW +5
- Value48 vs 52TROW +4
4 of 6 evidence groups favor TROW. TROW’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-23, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-22.
Largest factor move: Momentum -7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 2 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +11
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 3 active signals are unchanged.
TROW's lead widened by 5 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — APO and TROW both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
TROW (T. Rowe Price Group, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
APO (Apollo Global Management, Inc.): the counter-case, on fundamentals, analyst expectations — but at materially higher volatility, 25% against 19.8%.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TROWTROW on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
APOAPO on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TROWTROW on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points.
Momentum
TROWTROW on the Momentum factor, by 13 points.
Lower downside
TROWTROW on Risk Resilience, by 5 points.
Analyst upside
APOAPO on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors TROW, analyst targets favor APO. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | APO | TROW | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +20.5% | +5.3% | APO has more room |
| Target dispersion | +13.2% | +29.2% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 2 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | APO | TROW |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | -2.91% | 7.13% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $2.310 | $3.600 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $1.993 | $5.080 |
| Years increased | 3 | 5 |
| No cut in window | No (2) | Yes |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | #185 |
TROW grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 7.13% a year against APO's -2.91%. TROW never reduced its regular dividend in the window; APO did in 2 years.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
4 of 6 covered evidence groups favor TROW. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | TROW | 51 vs 63 |
| Fundamentals | APOon balance | revenue growth 121.7% vs 2.7%; EPS growth 169.8% vs 29.1%; TTM ROE 8.6% vs 20.4%; gross margin 84.5% vs 70.7%; operating margin 24.1% vs 30.3% — APO takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | TROW | Value 48 vs 52 |
| Technicals | TROW | Price vs 50-day -9.1% vs -2%; vs 200-day -9.1% vs 0.4% |
| Risk Resilience | TROW | Risk Resilience 66 vs 71 |
| Analyst expectations | APO | Target upside 20.5% vs 5.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of APO and TROW and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion rests on a wide gap and broad agreement. It is unlikely to turn on a single session.
- The AIQ gap is wide at 12 points. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader's signal state is cleanly positive. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TROW.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 24 – Oct 23TROW lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 12 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- TROW +12
- 51 vs 63
- 7 sessions ago
- TROW +10
- 48 vs 58
- 30 sessions ago
- TROW +14
- 48 vs 62
- 90 sessions ago
- TROW +4
- 58 vs 62
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Aug 20 when TROW moved ahead of APO.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 0 bearish
No signal that the other name lacks.
2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral
Only TROW
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Golden Cross Active, MACD Bullish Crossover.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -1.74%, AIQ -2 points).
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +0.72%, AIQ +3 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1APO closes the Quality gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to TROW's edge.
- 2APO generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active.
- 3TROW's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
APO leads on balance| Metric | APO | TROW |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 121.7% | 2.7% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 169.8% | 29.1% |
| Gross margin | 84.5% | 70.7% |
| Operating margin | 24.1% | 30.3% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 8.6% | 20.4% |
| Debt to equity | 0.65 | 0.04 |
Performance
TROW leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | APO | TROW |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 1.9% | 3.2% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -7.3% | -1.2% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -9.2% | -12.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -9.2% | 5.2% |
| Year to date | -22.1% | 1.8% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -10.4% | 0% |
Technicals
TROW has the stronger structure| Metric | APO | TROW |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 43.6 | 50.9 |
| ADX (14) | 35.1 | 29.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -9.1% | -2% |
| Price vs 200-day | -9.1% | 0.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 25% | 19.8% |
Risk
TROW is the more resilient| Metric | APO | TROW |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.13 | 0.81 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.25 | 0.01 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.36 | 0.02 |
| Max drawdown | -34.3% | -20.9% |
| Current drawdown | -26.1% | -14.4% |
| Annualized volatility | 35.9% | 23.7% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.6% | -2.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, APO or TROW?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TROW is the stronger of the two as of Oct 24, 2026, scoring 63 against APO's 51. The edge comes from quality and momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is APO or TROW the better buy right now?
TROW carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 24, 2026, and the comparison is rated Stable — 4 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Stable rating means the gap is wide and the evidence is broad, so the conclusion is unlikely to turn on a single session.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TROW over APO?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. TROW leads Quality by 21 points; TROW leads Momentum by 13 points; TROW leads Risk Resilience by 5 points. TROW leads on all four AIQ factor dimensions. Value is itself one of those four, so the sweep is not explained by APO simply being cheaper — it warrants extra scrutiny for unmodeled catalysts, forward expectations or event risk the factors do not capture.
Which has more analyst upside, APO or TROW?
Analyst price targets imply +20.5% upside for APO and +5.3% for TROW, so the Street currently favors APO. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors TROW. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, APO or TROW?
TROW is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TROW on the peer-relative Value factor, by 4 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, APO or TROW?
APO on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, APO or TROW?
TROW on the Momentum factor, by 13 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, APO or TROW?
TROW is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. TROW on Risk Resilience, by 5 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is APO more profitable than TROW?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 84.5% vs 70.7%; operating margin 24.1% vs 30.3%; ttm roe 8.6% vs 20.4%. APO leads on one measure and TROW on two measures, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is TROW's lead over APO getting stronger or weaker?
TROW lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 12 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-24 and 2026-10-23. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-20, when TROW moved ahead of APO.
What would change the APO vs TROW verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: APO closes the Quality gap — currently 21 points behind, the largest single contributor to TROW's edge; APO generates a confirmed bullish trend signal it does not currently carry, such as EMA Ribbon Expansion Bullish or Uptrend Structure Active; TROW's Golden Cross Active breaks down — it is the strongest rule currently supporting the verdict; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about APO and TROW?
APO: 2 bullish / 0 bearish. TROW: 2 bullish / 0 bearish / 1 neutral. The most decision-relevant rule on APO is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On TROW it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare APO and TROW with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.