ARE vs BRT Stock Comparison
ARE currently leads BRT in this stock comparison, with AIQ scores of 44 vs 40. The clearest difference is quality, while BRT has the stronger momentum profile.
What is the main difference between ARE and BRT?
ARE leads the current stock comparison as Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. vs BRT Apartments Corp.
ARE leads
ARE leads by 4 AIQ points, primarily on Quality, but the lead has narrowed from 11 points over 30 sessions. Wall Street currently favors BRT on target upside.
Fragile: 1 of 6 evidence groups support ARE, and its lead is narrowing.
Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.
BRT Apartments Corp.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors ARE over BRT, 44 versus 40 as of Oct 21, 2026. ARE's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality, while BRT holds the stronger momentum profile. ARE also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average, though analyst target upside currently favors BRT. 1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ARE today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. ARE lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 4 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc. and BRT Apartments Corp. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Total return with distributions reinvested, from daily closes.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000, distributions reinvested
Split-adjusted closes; each distribution is reinvested at the close on its ex-dividend date. Taxes and trading costs are not modeled.
Compare ARE and BRT against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality47 vs 13ARE +34
- Momentum24 vs 42BRT +18
- Risk Resilience39 vs 47BRT +8
- Value61 vs 61Even
1 of 6 evidence groups favor ARE. ARE’s edge is concentrated in quality; BRT keeps a meaningful momentum edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-10-20, compared against the prior scored session 2026-10-19.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience -2, not enough on its own to move the overall score.
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No signal started or stopped since the prior session; its 4 active signals are unchanged.
ARE's lead narrowed by 2 AIQ points in the latest session.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ARE and BRT both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
ARE (Alexandria Real Estate Equities, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality.
BRT (BRT Apartments Corp.): the counter-case, on momentum, risk resilience, technicals.
The AIQ Score and Wall Street therefore point in different directions on this pair.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
AREARE on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
BRTBRT on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
BRTBRT on the Momentum factor, by 18 points.
Lower downside
BRTBRT on Risk Resilience, by 8 points.
Analyst upside
BRTBRT on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
The model and the Street disagree here: AIQ favors ARE, analyst targets favor BRT. That disagreement is the most useful thing on this page.
| Measure | ARE | BRT | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +20.4% | +63.4% | BRT has more room |
| Target dispersion | +37.3% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Hold | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 9 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
The two are measuring different things. The AIQ Score reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; analyst targets price forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something already priced in — it is worth resolving before acting on either.
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Dividend growth
| Dividend metric | ARE | BRT |
|---|---|---|
| 5Y dividend CAGR | 1.99% | 2.59% |
| 2020 regular DPS | $4.240 | $0.880 |
| 2025 regular DPS | $4.680 | $1.000 |
| Years increased | 4 | 3 |
| No cut in window | No (1) | Yes |
| Cohort rank | not ranked | #22 |
BRT grew its split-adjusted regular dividend faster over 2020–2025 — 2.59% a year against ARE's 1.99%. BRT never reduced its regular dividend in the window; ARE did in 1 year.
Yield and payout ratio shown elsewhere on this page are current values, not part of the study window.
Split-adjusted regular dividends per share, 2020–2025, excluding special dividends. Research as of Sep 19, 2026.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
1 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ARE. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | ARE | 44 vs 40 |
| Fundamentals | Even | EPS growth -97.1% vs -35.7%; TTM ROE -5.7% vs -7.5%; gross margin 69.5% vs 28%; operating margin -45.7% vs 12.8% |
| Valuation | Even | Value 61 vs 61 |
| Technicals | BRT | Price vs 50-day -14.1% vs -8.1%; vs 200-day -14.7% vs -7.4% |
| Risk Resilience | BRT | Risk Resilience 39 vs 47 |
| Analyst expectations | BRT | Target upside 20.4% vs 63.4% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ARE and BRT and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Only 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been narrowing. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on ARE.
How the comparison changed
120 daily snapshots · Jun 21 – Oct 20ARE lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 4 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- ARE +4
- 44 vs 40
- 7 sessions ago
- ARE +5
- 44 vs 39
- 30 sessions ago
- ARE +11
- 47 vs 36
- 90 sessions ago
- BRT +2
- 47 vs 49
The lead changed hands 7 times in this window, most recently on Aug 26 when ARE moved ahead of BRT.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral
Only ARE
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.15%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
1 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted
Only BRT
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (0.9%)
- MACD Bullish Crossover — bullish, momentum, short horizon
Both carry 2 more signals that do not separate them: Death Cross Active, Downtrend Structure Active.
BRT is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.91%, AIQ 0 points).
Price is down while the AIQ Score moved up 2 points over the same session — price and model disagree (price -3.82%, AIQ +2 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BRT closes the Quality gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to ARE's edge.
- 2BRT's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3ARE starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4The narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 4-point move would eliminate ARE's advantage entirely.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | ARE | BRT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 18.6% | -0.5% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -97.1% | -35.7% |
| Gross margin | 69.5% | 28% |
| Operating margin | -45.7% | 12.8% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -5.7% | -7.5% |
| Debt to equity | 0.85 | 3.17 |
Performance
BRT leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | ARE | BRT |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -2.7% | -0.1% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -20.8% | -5.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -14.1% | -10.6% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -10.8% | -6% |
| Year to date | -12.9% | -9.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -43.3% | -10% |
Technicals
BRT has the stronger structure| Metric | ARE | BRT |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 30.1 | 50 |
| ADX (14) | 32.1 | 19 |
| Price vs 50-day | -14.1% | -8.1% |
| Price vs 200-day | -14.7% | -7.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 35.8% | 25.7% |
Risk
BRT is the more resilient| Metric | ARE | BRT |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 0.65 | 0.17 |
| Sharpe ratio | -1.01 | -0.56 |
| Sortino ratio | -1.25 | -0.86 |
| Max drawdown | -48% | -16.3% |
| Current drawdown | -45.2% | -14.5% |
| Annualized volatility | 48.1% | 22.3% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -4.9% | -2.3% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ARE or BRT?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, ARE is the stronger of the two as of Oct 21, 2026, scoring 44 against BRT's 40. The edge comes from quality. BRT is not without a case — it holds the better momentum profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ARE or BRT the better buy right now?
ARE carries the stronger systematic profile as of Oct 21, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 1 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 4 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor ARE over BRT?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. ARE leads Quality by 34 points; BRT leads Momentum by 18 points; BRT leads Risk Resilience by 8 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ARE or BRT?
Analyst price targets imply +20.4% upside for ARE and +63.4% for BRT, so the Street currently favors BRT. That points the opposite way to the AIQ Score, which favors ARE. The two are measuring different things: the model reads current fundamentals, valuation, trend and risk; the Street is pricing forward expectations. A divergence of this kind is either a contrarian opportunity or a sign the model is missing something the analysts have already priced — it is the single most useful row on this page to investigate. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ARE or BRT?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ARE or BRT?
BRT on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ARE or BRT?
BRT on the Momentum factor, by 18 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ARE or BRT?
BRT is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BRT on Risk Resilience, by 8 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ARE more profitable than BRT?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 69.5% vs 28%; operating margin -45.7% vs 12.8%; ttm roe -5.7% vs -7.5%. ARE leads on two measures and BRT on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is ARE's lead over BRT getting stronger or weaker?
ARE lead: Weakening — the AIQ differential moved from 11 to 4 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 120 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-06-21 and 2026-10-20. The lead has changed hands 7 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-26, when ARE moved ahead of BRT.
What would change the ARE vs BRT verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BRT closes the Quality gap — currently 34 points behind, the largest single contributor to ARE's edge; BRT's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; ARE starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; the narrowing continues — the lead has already given back 7 points over 30 sessions, and a further 4-point move would eliminate ARE's advantage entirely.
What do the current signals say about ARE and BRT?
ARE: 0 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral. BRT: 1 bullish / 3 bearish, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on ARE is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On BRT it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare ARE and BRT with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.