ARQQ vs JOBY Stock Comparison
Compare ARQQ and JOBY across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between ARQQ and JOBY?
ARQQ leads the current stock comparison as Arqit Quantum Inc., with the clearest separation coming from momentum and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Arqit Quantum Inc. vs Joby Aviation, Inc.
ARQQ leads
ARQQ leads by 8 AIQ points, primarily on Momentum.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support ARQQ, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Arqit Quantum Inc.
Joby Aviation, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors ARQQ over JOBY, 41 versus 33 as of Sep 11, 2026. ARQQ's advantage is driven primarily by stronger momentum. ARQQ also shows the stronger technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ARQQ today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. ARQQ lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 8 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Arqit Quantum Inc. and Joby Aviation, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare ARQQ and JOBY against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Momentum60 vs 25ARQQ +35
- Quality33 vs 35Even
- Value34 vs 34Even
- Risk Resilience39 vs 39Even
3 of 6 evidence groups favor ARQQ. ARQQ’s edge is concentrated in momentum.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -2
New signals
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience +1
No new signals fired.
ARQQ's lead was unchanged in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ARQQ and JOBY both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
ARQQ (Arqit Quantum Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by momentum.
JOBY (Joby Aviation, Inc.): the counter-case, on fundamentals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
ARQQARQQ on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
ARQQARQQ on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
EvenThe two are level on Value.
Momentum
ARQQARQQ on the Momentum factor, by 35 points.
Lower downside
JOBYJOBY carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility.
Analyst upside
ARQQARQQ on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | ARQQ | JOBY | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +199.3% | +139.9% | ARQQ has more room |
| Target dispersion | 0% | +32.6% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 1 | 3 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ARQQ. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | ARQQ | 41 vs 33 |
| Fundamentals | JOBYon balance | revenue growth 34.6% vs 59.4%; EPS growth -67.2% vs -108.3%; TTM ROE -183.7% vs -58.2%; gross margin 9.3% vs 24.8%; operating margin -48.6% vs -7.6% — JOBY takes 4 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | Even | Value 34 vs 34 |
| Technicals | ARQQ | Price vs 50-day -1.7% vs -15.4%; vs 200-day 5.9% vs -38.4% |
| Risk Resilience | Even | Risk Resilience 39 vs 39 |
| Analyst expectations | ARQQ | Target upside 199.3% vs 139.9% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ARQQ and JOBY and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 8 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has been steady session to session. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on ARQQ.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10ARQQ lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 8 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- ARQQ +8
- 41 vs 33
- 7 sessions ago
- ARQQ +6
- 38 vs 32
- 30 sessions ago
- ARQQ +6
- 44 vs 38
- 90 sessions ago
- ARQQ +8
- 40 vs 32
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Jul 16 when JOBY moved ahead of ARQQ.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
2 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (4.90%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Uptrend Structure Active — bullish, trend, long horizon
1 bullish / 5 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (35.68%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
ARQQ leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -2.58%, AIQ 0 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price +1.27%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1JOBY closes the Momentum gap — currently 35 points behind, the largest single contributor to ARQQ's edge.
- 2JOBY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it.
- 3ARQQ's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
JOBY leads on balance| Metric | ARQQ | JOBY |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 34.6% | 59.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | -67.2% | -108.3% |
| Gross margin | 9.3% | 24.8% |
| Operating margin | -48.6% | -7.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -183.7% | -58.2% |
| Debt to equity | 0.08 | 0.42 |
Performance
ARQQ leads 6 of 6 windows| Metric | ARQQ | JOBY |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | 0.2% | -7.5% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -13.2% | -20.7% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 57.2% | -28.8% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 39.5% | -38.3% |
| Year to date | -5.9% | -49.3% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -22.7% | -53% |
Technicals
ARQQ has the stronger structure| Metric | ARQQ | JOBY |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 48.4 | 16.8 |
| ADX (14) | 13.5 | 19.2 |
| Price vs 50-day | -1.7% | -15.4% |
| Price vs 200-day | 5.9% | -38.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 72.1% | 39.4% |
Risk
Split| Metric | ARQQ | JOBY |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 4.07 | 3.08 |
| Sharpe ratio | 0.26 | -0.74 |
| Sortino ratio | 0.48 | -1.29 |
| Max drawdown | -79.8% | -67.8% |
| Current drawdown | -64.7% | -67.8% |
| Annualized volatility | 116% | 72.2% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -9.9% | -6.4% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ARQQ or JOBY?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, ARQQ is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 41 against JOBY's 33. The edge comes from momentum. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ARQQ or JOBY the better buy right now?
ARQQ carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor ARQQ over JOBY?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. ARQQ leads Momentum by 35 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ARQQ or JOBY?
Analyst price targets imply +199.3% upside for ARQQ and +139.9% for JOBY, so the Street currently favors ARQQ. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ARQQ or JOBY?
Neither name separates on the peer-relative Value factor. The two are level on Value. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ARQQ or JOBY?
ARQQ on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ARQQ or JOBY?
ARQQ on the Momentum factor, by 35 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ARQQ or JOBY?
JOBY is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. JOBY carries the lower 1-month annualized volatility. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ARQQ more profitable than JOBY?
JOBY leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 9.3% vs 24.8%; operating margin -48.6% vs -7.6%; ttm roe -183.7% vs -58.2%.
Is ARQQ's lead over JOBY getting stronger or weaker?
ARQQ lead: Stable — the AIQ differential has held near 8 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-07-16, when JOBY moved ahead of ARQQ.
What would change the ARQQ vs JOBY verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: JOBY closes the Momentum gap — currently 35 points behind, the largest single contributor to ARQQ's edge; JOBY's Death Cross Active resolves — a bearish trend rule currently active against it; ARQQ's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 2 bullish and 1 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about ARQQ and JOBY?
ARQQ: 2 bullish / 1 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. JOBY: 1 bullish / 5 bearish / 2 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on ARQQ is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon). On JOBY it is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon).
Compare ARQQ and JOBY with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.