ARRY vs BEP Stock Comparison
Compare ARRY and BEP across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between ARRY and BEP?
ARRY leads the current stock comparison as Array Technologies, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from quality and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
Array Technologies, Inc. vs Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.
ARRY leads
ARRY leads by 11 AIQ points, primarily on Quality and Momentum, and the lead has widened from 4 points over 30 sessions.
Fragile: 3 of 6 evidence groups support ARRY, its lead is widening, and its current signal state is conflicted.
Array Technologies, Inc.
Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors ARRY over BEP, 48 versus 37 as of Sep 11, 2026. ARRY's advantage is driven primarily by stronger quality and momentum, while BEP holds the stronger risk resilience profile. ARRY also shows the weaker technical structure relative to its 50-day moving average. 3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ARRY today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. ARRY lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 11 points over 30 sessions.
Compare Array Technologies, Inc. and Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare ARRY and BEP against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Quality41 vs 14ARRY +27
- Risk Resilience35 vs 53BEP +18
- Momentum37 vs 25ARRY +12
- Value71 vs 61ARRY +10
3 of 6 evidence groups favor ARRY. ARRY’s edge is concentrated in quality and momentum; BEP keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum +7
No new signals fired.
Largest factor move: Risk Resilience -1
New signals
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
ARRY's lead widened by 2 AIQ points in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ARRY and BEP both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
ARRY (Array Technologies, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by quality and momentum.
BEP (Brookfield Renewable Partners L.P.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, technicals.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
ARRYARRY on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
ARRYARRY on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
ARRYARRY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points.
Momentum
ARRYARRY on the Momentum factor, by 12 points.
Lower downside
BEPBEP on Risk Resilience, by 18 points.
Analyst upside
ARRYARRY on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | ARRY | BEP | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +96.1% | +28.3% | ARRY has more room |
| Target dispersion | +66.2% | +30.8% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Buy | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 8 | 6 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 6 covered evidence groups favor ARRY. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | ARRY | 48 vs 37 |
| Fundamentals | Even | revenue growth 53.1% vs 9.4%; EPS growth 156.5% vs 10%; TTM ROE -47% vs 2.6%; gross margin 24.3% vs 24.4%; operating margin 3.3% vs 10.6% |
| Valuation | ARRY | Value 71 vs 61 |
| Technicals | BEP | Price vs 50-day -14.5% vs -6.9%; vs 200-day -41.7% vs -2.4% |
| Risk Resilience | BEP | Risk Resilience 35 vs 53 |
| Analyst expectations | ARRY | Target upside 96.1% vs 28.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ARRY and BEP and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is moderate at 11 points.
- Only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The leader's advantage has been widening. (supports the conclusion holding)
- The leader is throwing conflicting signals. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- Analyst targets on the leader are widely dispersed. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on ARRY.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10ARRY lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 11 points over 30 sessions.
- Today
- ARRY +11
- 48 vs 37
- 7 sessions ago
- ARRY +10
- 46 vs 36
- 30 sessions ago
- ARRY +4
- 47 vs 43
- 90 sessions ago
- ARRY +5
- 44 vs 39
The lead changed hands 5 times in this window, most recently on Aug 18 when ARRY moved ahead of BEP.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Death Cross Active — bearish, trend, long horizon (44.33%)
- 52-Week Low Proximity — bearish, risk, long horizon (1.1%)
- Downtrend Structure Active — bearish, trend, long horizon
2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (2.46%)
- Bollinger Band Squeeze — neutral, volatility, short horizon
- Keltner Channel Breakdown — bearish, volatility, short horizon
ARRY leads the comparison while carrying a conflicted signal state, which is one reason the stability rating is not higher.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved up over the latest session (price +1.54%, AIQ +2 points).
Neither the price nor the AIQ Score moved enough in the latest session to confirm or contradict the other (price -0.39%, AIQ 0 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1BEP closes the Quality gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to ARRY's edge.
- 2BEP's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it.
- 3ARRY's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
Split| Metric | ARRY | BEP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 53.1% | 9.4% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 156.5% | 10% |
| Gross margin | 24.3% | 24.4% |
| Operating margin | 3.3% | 10.6% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | -47% | 2.6% |
| Debt to equity | -3.73 | 8.43 |
Performance
BEP leads 5 of 6 windows| Metric | ARRY | BEP |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -0.4% | -1.7% |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -12.3% | -10.4% |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | -33.4% | -13.5% |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | -35.4% | -0.1% |
| Year to date | -50.7% | 13.1% |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | -48% | 21.9% |
Technicals
BEP has the stronger structure| Metric | ARRY | BEP |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 44.1 | 28.2 |
| ADX (14) | 20.2 | 18.6 |
| Price vs 50-day | -14.5% | -6.9% |
| Price vs 200-day | -41.7% | -2.4% |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 41.6% | 29.1% |
Risk
BEP is the more resilient| Metric | ARRY | BEP |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 2.95 | 0.85 |
| Sharpe ratio | -0.36 | 0.66 |
| Sortino ratio | -0.48 | 1.07 |
| Max drawdown | -63.5% | -18.2% |
| Current drawdown | -62% | -18.2% |
| Annualized volatility | 77.5% | 29.6% |
| Value at risk (95%) | -6.9% | -2.8% |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ARRY or BEP?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, ARRY is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 48 against BEP's 37. The edge comes from quality and momentum. BEP is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ARRY or BEP the better buy right now?
ARRY carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: only 3 of 6 covered evidence groups agree. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor ARRY over BEP?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. ARRY leads Quality by 27 points; BEP leads Risk Resilience by 18 points; ARRY leads Momentum by 12 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ARRY or BEP?
Analyst price targets imply +96.1% upside for ARRY and +28.3% for BEP, so the Street currently favors ARRY. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ARRY or BEP?
ARRY is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. ARRY on the peer-relative Value factor, by 10 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ARRY or BEP?
ARRY on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ARRY or BEP?
ARRY on the Momentum factor, by 12 points. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ARRY or BEP?
BEP is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. BEP on Risk Resilience, by 18 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ARRY more profitable than BEP?
BEP leads on the comparable margin measures — gross margin 24.3% vs 24.4%; operating margin 3.3% vs 10.6%; ttm roe -47% vs 2.6%.
Is ARRY's lead over BEP getting stronger or weaker?
ARRY lead: Strengthening — the AIQ differential moved from 4 to 11 points over 30 sessions. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 5 times in that window, most recently on 2026-08-18, when ARRY moved ahead of BEP.
What would change the ARRY vs BEP verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: BEP closes the Quality gap — currently 27 points behind, the largest single contributor to ARRY's edge; BEP's Keltner Channel Breakdown resolves — a bearish volatility rule currently active against it; ARRY's conflicting signal state resolves bearish — it currently carries 1 bullish and 3 bearish rules at once; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about ARRY and BEP?
ARRY: 1 bullish / 3 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. BEP: 2 bullish / 2 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on ARRY is Death Cross Active (bearish, long horizon). On BEP it is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare ARRY and BEP with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.