ATI vs TGI Stock Comparison
Compare ATI and TGI across AIQ Score, fundamentals, valuation, momentum, risk, analyst expectations and current market evidence.
What is the main difference between ATI and TGI?
TGI leads the current stock comparison as Triumph Group, Inc., with the clearest separation coming from value and the broader AIQ evidence mix.
AlgovestIQ AIQ Comparison
ATI Inc. vs Triumph Group, Inc.
TGI leads
TGI leads by 3 AIQ points, primarily on Value, having only recently taken the lead back from ATI.
Fragile: 3 of 5 evidence groups support TGI, and the lead recently changed hands.
ATI Inc.
Triumph Group, Inc.
The Algovestiq AIQ Score currently favors TGI over ATI, 43 versus 40 as of Sep 11, 2026. TGI's advantage is driven primarily by stronger value, while ATI holds the stronger risk resilience profile. 3 of 5 covered evidence groups favor TGI today, and the comparison is rated Fragile on stability: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. TGI lead: Reversed — ATI led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; TGI now leads by 3.
Compare ATI Inc. and Triumph Group, Inc. across the Algovestiq AIQ Score, valuation, quality, momentum, risk, technicals and analyst expectations.
Performance over time
Price-return comparison using available daily close history.
Total return comparison
Growth of $10,000
Based on available close-price history. Distribution reinvestment is not added unless already reflected in the source series.
Compare ATI and TGI against another ticker
Open a multi-ticker workspace without changing this focused pair page.
AIQ Factor Divergence
Where the two separate, on the four dimensions behind the AIQ Score. Bars read outward from a shared zero: further from the centre is a wider gap.
- Risk Resilience61 vs 43ATI +18
- Value27 vs 41TGI +14
- Quality50 vs 44ATI +6
3 of 5 evidence groups favor TGI. TGI’s edge is concentrated in value; ATI keeps a meaningful risk resilience edge.
What changed since the last close
Latest scored session 2026-09-10, compared against the prior scored session 2026-09-09.
Largest factor move: Momentum -15
No new signals fired.
No factor moved materially.
No new signals fired.
The lead changed hands: TGI moved ahead of ATI in the latest snapshot.
Deeper signal detail for each name lives on its own signals page — ATI and TGI both carry a full feed there.
The central trade-off
TGI (Triumph Group, Inc.): the stronger current systematic profile, led by value.
ATI (ATI Inc.): the counter-case, on risk resilience, quality.
Which one fits your objective
The same two names rank differently depending on what you are optimizing for. All six reads are shown at once — none of them is hidden behind a toggle.
Balanced
TGITGI on the overall AIQ Score, which weights Quality and Value most heavily.
Growth
TGITGI on combined revenue and EPS growth.
Value
TGITGI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 14 points.
Momentum
EvenThe two are level on Momentum.
Lower downside
ATIATI on Risk Resilience, by 18 points.
Analyst upside
TGITGI on implied upside to the consensus price target.
AIQ vs Wall Street
Where the systematic read and the analyst consensus line up — and where they do not.
| Measure | ATI | TGI | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| Implied upside to target | +9.5% | +238.3% | TGI has more room |
| Target dispersion | +49.6% | 0% | Lower is tighter analyst agreement |
| Consensus | Buy | Hold | Context, not a primary driver |
| Analysts covering | 5 | 1 | Higher coverage generally improves confidence |
Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions. Dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
AIQ Agreement Matrix
3 of 5 covered evidence groups favor TGI. A wide gap backed by one group is a weaker case than a narrow gap backed by five.
| Evidence group | Favors | Reading |
|---|---|---|
| AIQ Score | Even | 40 vs 43 |
| Fundamentals | TGIon balance | revenue growth 9.5% vs 19.8%; EPS growth 27.6% vs 89.5%; TTM ROE 26.6% vs -45.2%; gross margin 23.4% vs 31.5%; operating margin 15.3% vs 11% — TGI takes 3 of 5 decided legs, not all of them |
| Valuation | TGI | Value 27 vs 41 |
| Technicals | Not covered | Not covered |
| Risk Resilience | ATI | Risk Resilience 61 vs 43 |
| Analyst expectations | TGI | Target upside 9.5% vs 238.3% |
✓ agrees with the overall verdict · ✕ points the other way. Groups marked “not covered” lack data on one or both of ATI and TGI and are excluded from the count.
AIQ Decision Stability
The conclusion is sensitive to small changes. Treat the lead as provisional and watch the flip conditions below.
- The AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
- The lead has already changed hands inside the comparison window. (argues the conclusion is provisional)
Stability combines the score gap, how broadly the evidence agrees, how steady the lead has been across daily snapshots, the current signal state on both names, and analyst dispersion on TGI.
How the comparison changed
119 daily snapshots · May 4 – Sep 10TGI lead: Reversed — ATI led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; TGI now leads by 3.
- Today
- TGI +3
- 40 vs 43
- 7 sessions ago
- Level
- 43 vs 43
- 30 sessions ago
- ATI +1
- 51 vs 50
- 90 sessions ago
- TGI +9
- 41 vs 50
The lead changed hands 3 times in this window, most recently on Sep 10 when TGI moved ahead of ATI.
AIQ Signal Divergence
Only the signals that bear on the head-to-head. A conflicted name is carrying bullish and bearish rules at the same time — the technical evidence is not pointing one way.
1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted
- Golden Cross Active — bullish, trend, long horizon (26.68%)
- ATR Expansion - Breakout Mode — neutral, volatility, short horizon (4.07%)
- MACD Bearish Crossover — bearish, momentum, short horizon
No active signals
ATI is conflicted, so the timing case there is weaker than the score alone suggests.
Price vs model alignment
Whether the latest session's price move confirms what the model did over the same session, or contradicts it.
Price and the AIQ Score both moved down over the latest session (price -0.12%, AIQ -5 points).
What would flip this result
A state, not a forecast. These are the specific, observable changes that would reverse the verdict — not a price prediction.
- 1ATI closes the Value gap — currently 14 points behind, the largest single contributor to TGI's edge.
- 2ATI's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it.
- 3TGI starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals.
- 4A regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
The full evidence
Every number behind the verdict. The leader is called above each group so you are not left to solve it from the table.
Fundamentals
TGI leads on balance| Metric | ATI | TGI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue growth (YoY) | 9.5% | 19.8% |
| EPS growth (YoY) | 27.6% | 89.5% |
| Gross margin | 23.4% | 31.5% |
| Operating margin | 15.3% | 11% |
| Return on equity (TTM) | 26.6% | -45.2% |
| Debt to equity | 1.17 | -12.91 |
Performance
Split across windows| Metric | ATI | TGI |
|---|---|---|
| 1 week (5 sessions) | -1.3% | — |
| 1 month (20 sessions) | -13.6% | — |
| 3 months (63 sessions) | 8.5% | — |
| 6 months (126 sessions) | 26.4% | — |
| Year to date | 73.4% | — |
| 1 year (252 sessions) | 156.8% | — |
Technicals
Split| Metric | ATI | TGI |
|---|---|---|
| RSI (14) | 39.7 | — |
| ADX (14) | 14.7 | — |
| Price vs 50-day | -2% | — |
| Price vs 200-day | 25.3% | — |
| Volatility (1M, annualized) | 33.5% | — |
Risk
ATI is the more resilient| Metric | ATI | TGI |
|---|---|---|
| Beta | 1.7 | — |
| Sharpe ratio | 2.45 | — |
| Sortino ratio | 4.51 | — |
| Max drawdown | -18.6% | — |
| Current drawdown | -14.1% | — |
| Annualized volatility | 42% | — |
| Value at risk (95%) | -3.6% | — |
Straight answers
Each answer is regenerated from the current snapshot, not written once and left to age.
Which is better, ATI or TGI?
On the Algovestiq AIQ Score, TGI is the stronger of the two as of Sep 11, 2026, scoring 43 against ATI's 40. The edge comes from value. ATI is not without a case — it holds the better risk resilience profile, which matters more if that is the objective you are optimizing for. This is a systematic score, not a recommendation: it ranks the two on the same evidence, it does not know your holding period or tax position.
Is ATI or TGI the better buy right now?
TGI carries the stronger systematic profile as of Sep 11, 2026, and the comparison is rated Fragile — 3 of 5 covered evidence groups agree. A Fragile rating means the conclusion is sensitive: the AIQ gap is narrow at 3 points. Treat the lead as provisional.
Why does the AIQ Score favor TGI over ATI?
The composite weights Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk Resilience. ATI leads Risk Resilience by 18 points; TGI leads Value by 14 points; ATI leads Quality by 6 points. Where the two split, the factor with the larger weight carries the result.
Which has more analyst upside, ATI or TGI?
Analyst price targets imply +9.5% upside for ATI and +238.3% for TGI, so the Street currently favors TGI. The model and the Street agree here, which is a broader base of evidence than either alone. Analyst targets are expectations, not predictions, and dispersion matters as much as the midpoint.
Which is better value, ATI or TGI?
TGI is the better-valued of the two on the peer-relative Value factor. TGI on the peer-relative Value factor, by 14 points. The Value factor reads valuation relative to sector peers and to the company's own fundamental quality, so it is not the same as simply having the lower multiple.
Which has stronger growth, ATI or TGI?
TGI on combined revenue and EPS growth. Growth here is measured on reported revenue and earnings, not on forward estimates — it describes what the businesses have delivered, not what the Street expects next.
Which has stronger momentum, ATI or TGI?
The two are level on Momentum. Momentum is one of the four weighted factors in the AIQ composite. It has documented persistence over three- to twelve-month horizons, which makes it a timing input rather than a reason to hold something indefinitely.
Which is riskier, ATI or TGI?
ATI is the more resilient of the two, so the other name carries the higher downside risk. ATI on Risk Resilience, by 18 points. Risk Resilience is a weighted factor in the composite; position sizing usually responds to it more usefully than the buy/avoid decision does.
Is ATI more profitable than TGI?
The profitability evidence is mixed: gross margin 23.4% vs 31.5%; operating margin 15.3% vs 11%; ttm roe 26.6% vs -45.2%. ATI leads on two measures and TGI on one measure, and there is no single profitability composite that resolves the split — which of the two reads as "more profitable" depends on whether you weight pricing power or operating leverage.
Is TGI's lead over ATI getting stronger or weaker?
TGI lead: Reversed — ATI led by 1 AIQ points 30 sessions ago; TGI now leads by 3. This is measured from 119 daily comparison snapshots between 2026-05-04 and 2026-09-10. The lead has changed hands 3 times in that window, most recently on 2026-09-10, when TGI moved ahead of ATI.
What would change the ATI vs TGI verdict?
The result is a state, not a forecast, so it changes when the underlying evidence changes. Concretely: ATI closes the Value gap — currently 14 points behind, the largest single contributor to TGI's edge; ATI's MACD Bearish Crossover resolves — a bearish momentum rule currently active against it; TGI starts generating bearish momentum or trend signals; a regime shift changes factor weighting — Quality and Value carry the heaviest weights in the composite, so a rotation toward either would move the result most.
What do the current signals say about ATI and TGI?
ATI: 1 bullish / 1 bearish / 1 neutral, conflicted. TGI: No active signals. A conflicted state means bullish and bearish rules are active on the same name at once — the technical evidence is not pointing one way, and a decision taken on it carries more timing risk. The most decision-relevant rule on ATI is Golden Cross Active (bullish, long horizon).
Compare ATI and TGI with others
Continue your research
This page answers which of the two. These answer the questions on either side of it.
How this comparison is scored
The Algovestiq AIQ Score composites four factors — Quality, Value, Momentum and Risk, each carrying a fixed weight. Sentiment is reported separately as SentimentPulse and is not folded into the composite. Scores refresh every trading day, and this page regenerates from the latest snapshot rather than being written once.
The verdict names a leader, states how broadly six independent evidence groups agree, and rates how durable that conclusion is given the score gap, its recent trajectory and the current signal state on both names.
How to use side-by-side comparison →This comparison is informational and educational, not investment advice. AIQ scores update daily; re-check after earnings, guidance or macro data that materially changes either name’s factor profile.